PDF(1184 KB)
PDF(1184 KB)
PDF(1184 KB)
营商环境驱动城市共同富裕的多元路径研究
Research on multiple paths for urban common prosperity driven by business environment
优化营商环境提升经营主体活力,是实现共同富裕的重要驱动力。如何优化营商环境实现城市共同富裕是有待研究的重大现实问题。鉴于营商环境的复杂性,本文基于资源配置理论、新经济增长理论和制度理论,结合熵值法和模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法,从组态视角探究了我国268个地级市营商环境组态与共同富裕的复杂因果关系。研究发现:(1)单个营商环境要素并不构成实现高共同富裕的必要条件;(2)产生高共同富裕的路径有4条,包括:制度约束下技术进步驱动市场配置、制度保障下技术效率驱动市场配置、制度保障下社会资源驱动市场配置、制度调节下创新驱动市场配置;(3)优化市场环境在实现高共同富裕中发挥普适性作用。研究结论有助于揭示营商环境多重因素并发驱动城市共同富裕的复杂因果机制,深化我国城市实现高共同富裕多元驱动路径的认识,为城市构建高水平共享机制和高质量发展格局带来理论和实践启示。
Optimizing the business environment and enhancing the vitality of market entities is a crucial force in achieving common prosperity. However, how to optimize business environment for achieving urban common prosperity is a major practical issue. Given the complexity of business environment, this study combined the resource allocation theory, new economic growth theory, and institutional theory in conjunction with the entropy weight method and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method to investigate the complex causal relationship between business environment configuration and common prosperity in 268 Chinese cities from a configuration perspective. The findings suggested that: (1) A single condition of business environment does not constitute necessary condition for achieving high common prosperity; (2) Four paths would lead to high common prosperity, namely technological progress-driven market allocation under institutional constraint, technical efficiency-driven market allocation under institutional guarantee, social resource-driven market allocation under institutional guarantee, and innovation-driven market allocation under institutional regulation; (3) High market environment plays a universal role in achieving common prosperity. The conclusions have revealed the complex causal mechanism of multiple conditions in the business environment that collectively influence urban common prosperity. Moreover, this study will deepen the understanding of diverse paths for achieving high common prosperity, and provide theoretical and practical enlightenment for constructing high-level sharing mechanism and a high-quality development pattern in Chinese cities.
common prosperity / business environment / configurational perspective / fsQCA
| [1] |
中共中央关于进一步全面深化改革推进中国式现代化的决定[N]. 人民日报, 2024-07-22( 001).
Resolution of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on further deepening reform comprehensively to advance Chinese modernization[N]. People's Daily, 2024-07-22( 001).
|
| [2] |
杜运周, 孙宁, 刘秋辰. 运用混合方法发展和分析复杂中介模型:以营商环境促进创新活力,协同新质生产力和“就业优先”为例[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(6): 217-237.
|
| [3] |
This paper aims to explain the causal complexity between ecosystems of doing business and living standards based on the theoretical model of the ecosystem of doing business proposed by Li (2019) and Du et al. (2020). By integrating ecological theory, transaction cost theory and institutional logics theory, this study explored effective ecosystems of doing business that achieve high living standards and explained the interpretive mechanisms behind different ecosystems of doing business. Moreover, this study also analyzed whether there were any necessary elements that lead to high living standards and discussed how the interactions between these elements influence carrying capacity and transaction costs from government logic and market logic, thus affecting living standards.
|
| [4] |
刘培林, 钱滔, 黄先海, 等. 共同富裕的内涵、实现路径与测度方法[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(8): 117-129.
|
| [5] |
李实. 共同富裕的目标和实现路径选择[J]. 经济研究, 2021, 56(11): 4-13.
|
| [6] |
杜运周, 刘秋辰, 陈凯薇, 等. 营商环境生态、全要素生产率与城市高质量发展的多元模式:基于复杂系统观的组态分析[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(9): 127-145.
|
| [7] |
中国城市营商环境评价研究课题组. 中国城市营商环境评价的理论逻辑、比较分析及对策建议[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5): 98-112.
“Research on Evaluation of Doing Business in Chinese Cities” Research Group. Theoretical logic, comparative analysis, and the countermeasures of doing business assessment in Chinese cities[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37(5): 98-112.
|
| [8] |
牛志伟, 许晨曦, 武瑛. 营商环境优化、人力资本效应与企业劳动生产率[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(2): 83-100.
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
李实, 杨一心. 面向共同富裕的基本公共服务均等化:行动逻辑与路径选择[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(2): 27-41.
|
| [11] |
龙泳翰, 冯晓青. 共同富裕目标下知识产权制度研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2024(1): 67-75.
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
吴鹏, 万广华, 常远. 科技成果转移转化与共同富裕:来自中国的验证[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(10): 80-90.
|
| [14] |
李实, 朱梦冰. 推进收入分配制度改革促进共同富裕实现[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(1): 52-61+76+62.
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
聂长飞, 程承坪, 陈志. 数字经济、企业家精神与共同富裕:来自下一代互联网示范城市的证据[J]. 中国软科学, 2023(10): 132-145.
|
| [17] |
杜运周, 刘秋辰, 程建青. 什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度?:基于制度组态的分析[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(9): 141-155.
|
| [18] |
黄明成. 关于公平与效率相互关系的几点思考[J]. 中央社会主义学院学报, 2007(5): 66-69.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
黄先海, 宋学印. 赋能型政府:新一代政府和市场关系的理论建构[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(11): 41-55+4.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
周慧珺, 傅春杨, 龚六堂. 就业政策如何影响收入分配?:基于量化空间一般均衡模型的理论分析[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(1): 38-63.
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
刘伟, 张立元. 经济发展潜能与人力资本质量[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(1): 8-24+230.
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
张来明, 李建伟. 促进共同富裕的内涵、战略目标与政策措施[J]. 改革, 2021(9): 16-33.
|
| [29] |
刘文文, 李克强, 付海洋. 数字金融发展对共同富裕影响的实证检验[J]. 统计与决策, 2023, 39(22): 140-145.
|
| [30] |
李志, 谢梦华. 人力资源服务助推乡村振兴发展研究:基于实现共同富裕目标视角[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 29(2): 286-298.
|
| [31] |
于文超, 梁平汉. 不确定性、营商环境与民营企业经营活力[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(11): 136-154.
|
| [32] |
夏后学, 谭清美, 白俊红. 营商环境、企业寻租与市场创新:来自中国企业营商环境调查的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(4): 84-98.
|
| [33] |
陈怀超, 白珊, 侯佳雯, 等. 多因素联动对企业商业模式创新的影响:基于fsQCA方法[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(9): 140-148.
运用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法,剖析组织惯例(利用式惯例与探索式惯例)、资源重构(资源重组与资源重置)、创新柔性和技术动荡性多因素联动对企业商业模式创新的影响。结果表明,单个因素均不是高/非高商业模式创新产生的必要条件;高商业模式创新产生的组态有3个,即惯例+资源保障的自我适应型、惯例弥补资源的内外协同驱动型和惯例+资源稳定的内外协同驱动型;非高商业模式创新产生的组态有3个,且与高商业模式创新产生的组态呈现非对称性关系。此外,创新柔性在高/非高商业模式创新产生过程中的作用突出,高利用式惯例是高商业模式创新产生的重要条件,非高资源重置是非高商业模式创新产生的重要条件。
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
李志军. 2022中国城市营商环境报告[M]. 北京: 中国商业出版社, 2023.
|
| [36] |
池毛毛, 叶丁菱, 王俊晶, 等. 我国中小制造企业如何提升新产品开发绩效:基于数字化赋能的视角[J]. 南开管理评论, 2020, 23(3): 63-75.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |