科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (8): 65-79.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.08.007

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

城市营商环境生态驱动企业新质生产力发展的组态研究

田庆锋，沈伟康，李瑶   

  1. 西北工业大学 管理学院，陕西 西安710129
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-30 修回日期:2025-05-30 出版日期:2025-08-20 发布日期:2025-08-14
  • 通讯作者: 沈伟康
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重大项目：“新兴领域军民融合高质量发展的机制和路径研究”（22&ZD069, 2023.01—2027.12）;国家自然科学基金面上项目：“数字化转型下航天企业技术创新与商业模式创新耦合演化研究”（72172128, 2022.01—2025.12）；西北工业大学博士论文创新基金项目（SOMBC202502, 2025.05—2026.05）。

Research on the configurations of the development of enterprises′ new quality productive forces driven by urban business environment ecology

Tian Qingfeng, Shen Weikang, Li Yao   

  1. School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi′an 710129, Shaanxi, China
  • Received:2024-04-30 Revised:2025-05-30 Online:2025-08-20 Published:2025-08-14

摘要：    优化城市营商环境生态对发展企业新质生产力至关重要。本文立足于企业新质生产力的时代内涵构建其评价指标体系，并结合制度逻辑框架与生态系统耦合观，采用动态QCA方法，以2011—2021年间84家战略性新兴企业为例，探究城市营商环境生态驱动企业新质生产力发展的组态路径及其演变规律。研究发现：（1）单个营商环境生态要素不是企业新质生产力发展的必要条件；（2）驱动企业新质生产力发展的组态路径可归纳为政府主导下的偏人力紧密耦合型（H1）、政府主导-市场调节下的偏金融松散耦合型（H2）、政府-市场双元主导下的偏金融紧密耦合型（H3）和服务型政府主导-市场调节下的偏人力与创新松散耦合型（H4）4种，创新和金融环境在其中发挥着较为普适的作用；（3）组态H1、H2和H3的组间一致性水平呈现明显的平行波动趋势，且部分企业并不遵循单一组态，4条组态的组内覆盖度地区差异显著。研究结果有助于揭示城市营商环境生态中企业新质生产力形成机制的“黑箱”，为因地制宜发展新质生产力提供理论与实践启示。

关键词: 企业新质生产力, 城市营商环境生态, 生态系统耦合观, 制度逻辑, 动态QCA

Abstract:    Optimizing urban business environment ecology is crucial for the development of enterprises′ new quality productive forces. This paper constructed an evaluation index system based on the contemporary connotation of enterprises′ new quality productive forces and combined institutional logic framework with the ecosystem coupling perspective. Using the dynamic QCA methodology and a sample of 84 strategic emerging enterprises from 2011 to 2021, the study explored the configuration paths and evolutionary patterns of the development of enterprises′ new quality productive forces driven by urban business environment ecology. The findings are as follows: (1) Individual business environment ecological factors are not necessary conditions for the development of enterprises′ new quality productive forces; (2) Four configuration paths driving enterprises′ new quality productive forces are identified as follows: human resources-oriented tightly coupled under government leadership (H1), government-led-market-regulated loosely coupled with finance (H2), government-market dual-lead tightly coupled with finance (H3), and service-oriented government-led-market-regulated loosely coupled with human resources and innovation (H4), with innovation and financial environments playing a relatively universal role; (3) The inter-group consistency of configurations between H1, H2, and H3 shows a distinct parallel fluctuation trend, with some enterprises not adhering to a single configuration, and significant regional differences in the within coverage of all four configurations. The results of this study will contribute to uncovering the “black box” of the formation mechanism of enterprises′ new quality productive forces within the urban business environment ecology, thus providing theoretical and practical insights for developing new quality productive forces in a context-specific manner.

Key words: enterprises′ new quality productive force, urban business environment ecology, ecosystem coupling perspective, institutional logic, dynamic QCA