营商环境生态促进区域专精特新企业扩量提质的组态研究

章俨, 邬爱其, 王露, 余维臻

科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7) : 49-59.

PDF(1211 KB)
PDF(1211 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7) : 49-59. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.07.005  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2025.07.005

营商环境生态促进区域专精特新企业扩量提质的组态研究

作者信息 +

Research on the configurations for the quantity expansion and quality improvement of regional SRDI enterprises driven by business environment ecosystem

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

营商环境生态是促进专精特新企业扩量提质的重要前因。本文以中国城市数据为样本,采用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)方法探索市场—政府双元制度逻辑下营商环境生态影响区域专精特新企业扩量提质的生态模式,提出“双元制度下的服务驱动综合赋能型”“市场主导下的产金双驱型”“政府引导下的产研政共促型”三种促进区域专精特新企业数量扩张的营商环境生态模式,以及“双元制度下的人才驱动综合赋能型”“市场主导下的才创双驱型”“政府主导下的才金政共促型”三种推动区域专精特新企业质量提升的营商环境生态模式。此外,本文还引入了余弦相似度分析方法,对数量与质量的高绩效与低绩效组态结果进行相似性分析以识别营商环境生态优化路径。研究发现,“质量优先”的单高营商环境生态优化路径比“数量优先”路径更具普适性;而“存量再配置”与“增量二级跳”两种营商环境生态优化路径可实现数量与质量的双高培育。研究结果为各地优化城市营商环境生态和加快推进区域专精特新企业扩量提质提供了理论借鉴与实践指导。

Abstract

The business environment ecosystem serves as a critical antecedent for improving both the quantity and quality of regional SRDI (abbreviation for "Specialized, Refined, Differential and Innovative") enterprises. Leveraging the city-level data from China and employing the fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) approach, this paper investigated the ecological configurations through which the business environment ecosystem, under the dual institutional logics of market-government, influences the quantity expansion and quality improvement of regional SRDI enterprises. It proposed three ecological recipes that facilitate the quantity expansion of SRDI enterprises: "service driven comprehensive empowerment under dual institutional logics", "production-finance nexus driven under market dominance" and "industry-research-government co-promotion under government guidance". In parallel, three ecological recipes are identified to improve the quality of SRDI enterprises: "talent-driven comprehensive empowerment under dual institutional logics", "talent-innovation dual-driven under market dominance", and "talent-finance-government co-promotion under government leadership". Additionally, the cosine similarity analysis method was introduced to compare the similarities between high-performance and low-performance configurations for quantity expansion and quality improvement, aiming to identify paths for optimizing the business environment ecosystem. The results indicated that the "quality-first" optimization paths are generally better than the "quantity-first" paths, while the "stock reallocation" and "incremental leap" optimization paths can promote both the quantity and quality of regional SRDI enterprises. These findings will provide theoretical and practical insights for optimizing urban business environment ecosystems and accelerate the development of high-performing SRDI enterprises across regions.

关键词

营商环境生态 / 专精特新企业 / 制度逻辑 / fsQCA方法 / 余弦相似度分析

Key words

business environment ecosystem / SRDI enterprise / institutional logics / fsQCA method / cosine similarity analysis

引用本文

导出引用
章俨, 邬爱其, 王露, . 营商环境生态促进区域专精特新企业扩量提质的组态研究[J]. 科研管理. 2025, 46(7): 49-59 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.07.005
Zhang Yan, Wu Aiqi, Wang Lu, et al. Research on the configurations for the quantity expansion and quality improvement of regional SRDI enterprises driven by business environment ecosystem[J]. Science Research Management. 2025, 46(7): 49-59 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.07.005
中图分类号: F276.3   

参考文献

[1]
曾宪聚, 曾凯, 任慧, 等. 专精特新企业成长研究:综述与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2024, 46(1):62-76.
ZENG Xianju, ZENG Kai, REN Hui, et al. The growth of SRDI enterprises: A review and prospects[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2024, 46(1): 62-76.
[2]
杨林, 徐培栋. 有无相生:数字化背景下“专精特新”单项冠军企业双元创新的前因组态及其效应研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2024, 27(2):137-151.
YANG Lin, XU Peidong. The philosophy of presence and absence:A study on the antecedent configuration and effect of the dual innovation of the champion enterprise of specialized innovation under the digital background[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2024, 27(2): 137-151.
[3]
陈西婵, 陈艳, 罗正英, 等. 营商环境、研发补贴与国有企业实质性创新[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(2):155-164.
CHEN Xichan, CHEN Yan, LUO Zhengying, et al. Business environment, R&D subsidies, and substantive innovation in state-owned enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(2): 155-164.
[4]
孙哲远, 白燕. 城市人才政策如何影响中小企业“专精特新”转型[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2024, 41(3):98-108.
SUN Zheyuan, BAI Yan. How urban talent policies affect the transformation of small and medium enterprises into “specialization, refinement, and innovation”[J]. Human Resources Development of China, 2024, 41(3): 98-108.
[5]
杜运周, 刘秋辰, 程建青. 什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度?:基于制度组态的分析[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(9):141-155.
DU Yunzhou, LIU Qiuchen, CHENG Jianqing. What kind of ecosystem for doing business will contribute to city-level high entrepreneurial activity? A research based on institutional configurations[J]. Journal of Management World, 2020, 36(9): 141-155.
[6]
夏清华, 朱清. 增量提质:营商环境生态与专精特新企业:基于模糊集定性比较分析[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2023, 44(8):126-144.
XIA Qinghua, ZHU Qing. Growth of quantity and improvement of quality: Business environment and specialized, refined,unique and innovative firms:Based on the fsQCA method[J]. Research on Economics and Management, 2023, 44(8): 126-144.
[7]
李志军. 我国重点城市群营商环境评价及比较研究[J]. 北京工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 36(6):17-28.
LI Zhijun. Research on evaluation and comparison of business environment in China's major urban agglomerations[J]. Journal of Beijing Technology and Business University(Social Sciences), 2021, 36(6): 17-28.
[8]
牛志伟, 许晨曦, 武瑛. 营商环境优化、人力资本效应与企业劳动生产率[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(2):83-100.
NIU Zhiwei, XU Chenxi, WU Ying. Business environment optimization, human capital effect and firm labor productivity[J]. Journal of Management World, 2023, 39(2): 83-100.
[9]
YU L, LI H, WANG Z, et al. Technology imports and self-innovation in the context of innovation quality[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 214: 44-52.
[10]
贾建锋, 刘伟鹏, 杜运周, 等. 制度组态视角下绿色技术创新效率提升的多元路径[J]. 南开管理评论, 2024, 27(2):51-61.
JIA Jianfeng, LIU Weipeng, DU Yunzhou, et al. Multiple paths for improving green technology innovation efficiency from the perspective of institutional configuration[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2024, 27(2): 51-61.
[11]
杨灵, 王晓瑜, 陈劲. 基于制度逻辑理论视角的创业理论文献综述[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(7):95-104.
YANG Ling, WANG Xiaoyu, CHEN Jin. The institutional logics perspective in entrepreneurship research: Literature review[J]. Management Review, 2022, 34(7): 95-104.
[12]
刘静, 王艺霏, 杨小科. 创新主体与营商环境的协同如何驱动区域创新绩效?:基于制度逻辑的组态效应[J]. 科学管理研究, 2023, 41(5):88-96.
LI Jing, WANG Yifei, YANG Xiaoke. How does the synergy between innovation subject and doing business affect regional innovation performance?A research based on configuration effect of institutional logic[J]. Scientific Management Research, 2023, 41(5): 88-96.
[13]
陈强, 丁玉, 敦帅. 基于贝叶斯网络的营商环境影响机制研究[J]. 软科学, 2021, 35(1):126-133.
CHEN Qiang, DING Yu, DUN Shuai. Research on business environment impact mechanism based on Bayesian network[J]. Soft Science, 2021, 35(1): 126-133.
[14]
韩文海, 苏敬勤. 情境感知与战略逻辑“相位转变”:新兴场域企业创新选择演化路径[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(5):202-217.
HAN Wenhai, SU Jingqin. Context awareness and phase shift of strategic logic: The evolution path of enterprise innovation choice in emerging field[J]. Management Review, 2022, 34(5): 202-217.
[15]
安家骥, 刘国亮. 营商环境驱动专精特新企业创新的路径选择:基于FsQCA的定性比较分析[J]. 科学管理研究, 2023, 41(2):101-110.
AN Jiaji, LIU Guoliang. Business environment for high-quality development: All-inclusive or localized? The example of innovation in specialized and new enterprises[J]. Scientific Management Research, 2023, 41(2): 101-110.
[16]
葛宝山, 王治国. 隐形冠军企业创业研究述评及展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2020, 42(11):20-32.
GE Baoshan, WANG Zhiguo. A review of the research on hidden champion entrepreneurship and prospects[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2020, 42(11): 20-32.
[17]
许晖, 李阳, 刘田田, 等. “专精特新”企业如何突破专业化“锁定”困境?:创新搜寻视角下的多案例研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(10):3-19.
XU Hui, LI Yang, LIU Tiantian, et al. How can “SRDI” enterprises break through the dilemma of specialization “Lock-in”? A multi-case study on innovation search perspectives[J]. Foreign Economies & Management, 2023, 45(10): 3-19.
[18]
田红云, 李永友, 李忠正. 研发费用加计扣除政策对中小企业高质量创新的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(3):53-63.
TIAN Hongyun, LI Yongyou, LI Zhongzheng. Impact of pretax additional deduction policy for R&D expenditure on high quality innovation of SMEs[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(3): 53-63.
[19]
WANG H, ZHAO T, COOPER S Y, et al. Effective policy mixes in entrepreneurial ecosystems: A configurational analysis in China[J]. Small Business Economics, 2023, 60: 1509-1542.
Policy-makers are seeking to build vibrant entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs) to promote innovative entrepreneurship. However, the role of government policy in EEs, especially in the emerging economy context, is poorly understood, lacking a systematic concept of policy and theoretical framework, clear policy classification, and empirical research considering distinctive characteristics of policy mixes in EEs. This paper introduces the concept of EE policy mixes and classifies them into seven policy instruments. Using data from 21 national high-tech zones (NHZs) in China, fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) is applied to identify effective configurations of EE policy mixes that support early-stage and late-stage technology start-ups to produce high entrepreneurial performance. The configurational analysis shows that EE policy mixes present causal complexity and stage differences. Based on interpreting multiple policy interactions, we reveal the differentiated support mechanisms of EE policy mixes in NHZs and draw out their implications for research, policy, and practice. This study contributes to the EE literature by adopting a policy-mix perspective to examine the role of policy, exploring the specific emerging economy context of China, suggesting further extensions of the research to other contexts, and applying a methodology that reveals causal mechanisms. It also supports better-informed EE policy and governance.
[20]
俞立平, 张宏如. 区域创新升级:如何从创新数量走向创新质量:基于统计学视角的模式识别及跃迁机制研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2023(2):35-45.
YU Liping, ZHANG Hongru. Regional innovation upgrading: How to move from innovation quantity to innovation quality: Research on pattern recognition and transition mechanism[J]. China Soft Science, 2023(2):35-45.
[21]
杜运周, 贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界, 2017(6):155-167.
DU Yunzhou, JIA Liangding. Configurational perspective and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): A new approach to management research[J]. Journal of Management World, 2017(6): 155-167.
[22]
COSTA LUCIANO DA F. On similarity[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2022, 599: 127456.
[23]
BORDES A, USUNIER N, GARCIA-DURAN A, et al. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2013, 26:2787-2795.
[24]
AKHTAR M S, KUMAR A, GHOSAL D, et al. A multilayer perceptron based ensemble technique for fine-grained financial sentiment analysis[C]// Proceedings of the 2017 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. 2017.
[25]
GOLDBERG D, NICHOLS D, OKI B M, et al. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1992, 35(12): 61-70.
[26]
FURNARI S, CRILLY D, MISANGYI V F, et al. Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2021, 46:778-799.
[27]
FISS P C. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54: 393-420.
[28]
李政. 稳定就业如何影响技能形成:基于我国企业雇佣制度的历史考察[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2024, 42(4):51-62.
摘要
技能,尤其是专有技能的形成,需要个体扎根某一岗位长时间的耕耘和摸索,这就需要为劳动者提供相对稳定的工作环境和就业保障。计划经济时期,我国国有企业执行统包统配的计划式就业,企业采取劳动竞赛、厂内师徒制、技术协作等方法促进个体的技能形成;社会主义市场经济时期,公有制企业以编制制度,为部分技术技能人才提供了就业稳定的制度保障,同时进一步延续和创新了技能竞赛、基于专家工作室的师徒制、职称评定等制度促进员工的技能形成,而非公有制企业则通过签订长期合同、竞业禁止等给予雇员稳定雇佣的可信承诺,并通过强化员工忠诚教育、建立内部人才上升和流动通道、建立内部人才培养体系和劳动力市场等措施,提升员工专有技能的形成效率。本质上,这是社会主义市场经济环境下,企业内劳动力商品化和去商品化之间的一次再平衡。企业以稳定的雇佣承诺尊重和保护劳动者作为人的特质和需求,并通过师徒传承、生涯发展、锦标赛和内培内招四大机制,发挥劳动力作为生产要素的价值。这一机制还受到国家经济体制以及规范有序的行业内部劳动力市场的宏观影响。未来我国的就业政策、教育政策、社会保障政策应重点促进社会群体的稳定就业,通过积极创设稳定就业的制度环境、提升中小微企业的人力资源开发与技能形成能力、提升职业院校校企合作人才培养的结构性与合规性,协助企业构筑健康稳定、可预期的劳资合作关系。
LI Zheng. How stable employment affects skill formation: A historical review based on the employment system of Chinese enterprises[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2024, 42(4):51-62.
[29]
吕炜, 姬明曦, 杨沫. 人口流动能否影响社会信任:基于中国综合社会调查(CGSS)的经验研究[J]. 经济学动态, 2017(12):61-72.
LYU Wei, JI Mingxi, YANG Mo. Can population mobility affect social trust? An empirical study based on the China General Social Survey (CGSS)[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2017(12):61-72.
[30]
张红凤, 汲昌霖. 政治关联、金融生态环境与企业融资:基于山东省上市公司数据的实证分析[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2015(11):77-86.
摘要
本文将金融生态环境纳入到政府与企业关系的考察中,基于山东省的经验,实证检验政治关联、金融生态环境与企业融资的关系。研究发现:(1)金融生态环境及其下属维度发展水平的提升均有助于缓解企业融资压力,促进企业发展;(2)金融生态环境会对政治关联产生“声誉替代效应”,当金融生态环境指数达到某一临界值时,企业建立政治关联会得不偿失。本文的研究对于我国现阶段加快民营经济发展及建设区域金融中心的双重目标有一定的政策借鉴意义。
ZHANG Hongfeng, JI Changlin. Political association, financial ecological environment and corporate finance[J]. Economic Theory and Business Management, 2015(11):77-86.
<p>Based on listed companies from 2006 to 2013 in Shandong province of 858 samples, this paper examined the relationship between the political association and the corporate financing when the financial ecological environment index was on different level. The results showed that: (1) the financial ecological environment development level and their subordinate dimensions were both do help to alleviate the pressure of the corporate finance; (2) there was a &ldquo;reputation substitution effect&rdquo; between the financial ecological environment and the political association, when the financial ecological environment index reached a critical value, the enterprise who established a link to government would do more harm than good. This paper had a certain reference of policy significance for speeding up the development of private economy and the construction of regional financial center at present stage in China.</p>
[31]
RICHARD O C, WU J, MARKOCZY L A, et al. Top management team demographic-faultline strength and strategic change: What role does environmental dynamism play?[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2019, 40(6): 987-1009.
[32]
孙宁, 杜运周, 陈凯薇. 混合方法研究的原理与设计:以QCA与多案例研究的混合为例[J]. 南开管理评论, 2024, 27(9):185-196.
SUN Ning, DU Yunzhou, CHEN Kaiwei. Principles and designs of mixed methods research: Take the mixing of QCA and multi-case study as an example[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2024, 27(9):185-196.
[33]
杜运周, 李佳馨, 刘秋辰, 等. 复杂动态视角下的组态理论与QCA方法:研究进展与未来方向[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(3):180-197+12-13.
DU Yunzhou, LI Jiaxin, LIU Qiuchen, et al. Configurational theory and QCA method from a complex dynamic perspective: Research progress and future directions[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37(3): 180-197+12-13.
[34]
杜运周, 孙宁, 刘秋辰. 运用混合方法发展和分析复杂中介模型:以营商环境促进创新活力,协同新质生产力和“就业优先”为例[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(6):217-237.
DU Yunzhou, SUN Ning, LI Qiuchen. Developing and analyzing complex mediation models using mixed methods: An illustration of doing business promoting innovation vitality, synergizing new quality productive forecs and employment-first[J]. Journal of Management World, 2024, 40(6): 217-237.

基金

国家自然科学基金重点项目:“专精特新企业成长机制与培育模式研究”(72332005,2024.01—2028.12)
浙江省哲学社会科学规划一般课题:“协同视角下企业数字平台价值创造困境及实践路径”(24SSHZ013YB,2024.06—2027.06)
国家社会科学基金一般项目:“共同富裕背景下乡村创业高质量发展的模式与推进机制研究”(22BGL021,2022.09—2026.12)
浙江省社科规划“党的二十届三中全会和省委十五届五次全会精神研究阐释”专项课题成果

PDF(1211 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/