科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 104-112.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.06.011

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

数字营商环境生态赋能城市科技创新的路径研究

李晓娣,马雨萱   

  1. 哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院, 黑龙江 哈尔滨150001
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-13 修回日期:2025-04-22 出版日期:2025-06-20 发布日期:2025-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 马雨萱
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(20BTJ023);黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划专项智库团队项目(23ZKT013);黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划专题重点项目(24JLH001)。

Research on the paths of urban science and technology innovation empowered by the digital business environment ecosystem

Li Xiaodi, Ma Yuxuan   

  1. School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2024-01-13 Revised:2025-04-22 Online:2025-06-20 Published:2025-06-06

摘要:     在营商环境数字化的演进趋势下,数字营商环境生态对于城市科技创新具有重要意义。本文基于新结构经济学、资源依赖理论及交易成本理论,以2019—2021年61个国家大数据综合试验区试点城市数据为样本,运用QCA方法探究数字营商环境生态赋能城市科技创新的复杂机制和多元路径。研究发现:(1)数字营商环境生态要素中不存在实现高城市科技创新的必要条件,同一要素在不同组态中的重要程度呈现差异化特征,但数字基础设施发挥相对普适的作用。(2)4种数字营商环境生态可以产生高城市科技创新,分别为数字基建下金融助力的数字政-市协作型、数字基建下资源聚合的数字政府引导型、数字基建下人才驱动的数字政务缺乏-数字化市场主导型、数字基建下资源聚合的数字化市场主导型。(3)存在4种数字营商环境生态导致非高城市科技创新,可分为数字基建缺位的生态待建型和资源缺位的数字政-市协作不足型。研究丰富了对数字营商环境生态与城市科技创新复杂关系的认识,为推进数字营商环境建设及完善科技创新体制机制提供了有益思路。

关键词: 数字营商环境生态, 城市科技创新, QCA, 组态分析

Abstract:     Under the evolution trend of the digitalization of doing business, the digital business environment ecosystem is of great significance for urban science and technology (S&T) innovation. Based on the new structural economics, resource dependence theory and the transaction cost theory, this paper employed the qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) method to explore the complex mechanisms and multivariate configuration paths of urban S&T innovation empowered by digital business environment ecosystem, by taking the data of 61 pilot cities of the national big data comprehensive pilot zone from 2019 to 2021. The findings showed that: (1) There is no single condition within the digital business environment ecosystem  can be regarded as the necessary condition for high urban S&T innovation, the importance of the same condition shows differentiation characteristics in different configurations; however, improving digital infrastructure plays a more general role in producing high urban S&T innovation; (2) Four types of digital business environment ecosystems produce high urban S&T innovation, including digital government-market collaboration with financial assistance under digital infrastructure, digital government-led with resource aggregation under digital infrastructure, talent-driven and digital market-oriented under digital infrastructure which lack of government affairs, digital market-oriented with resource aggregation under digital infrastructure; (3) There are four types of ecosystems of digital business environment leading non-high urban S&T innovation, which can be divided into ecosystem to-be-built with the absence of digital infrastructure and lack of digital government-market collaboration with the absence of resources. The findings will enrich the understanding of complex mechanisms and multivariate configuration paths for urban S&T innovation empowered by the digital business environment ecosystem and provide beneficial ideas for promoting the construction of digital business environment and improving the S&T innovation system and mechanism.

Key words: digital business environment ecosystem, urban science and technology innovation, qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), configuration analysis