PDF(1102 KB)
PDF(1102 KB)
PDF(1102 KB)
城市营商环境赋能元宇宙企业高质量发展的作用机制
The action mechanism of the high-quality development of metaverse firms empowered by city-level business environment
元宇宙是国家数字经济战略竞争力的重要标志,如何优化城市营商环境生态促进元宇宙企业高质量发展是有待回答的重要管理问题。本文以193家元宇宙企业及其所在的49个城市为样本,采用NCA和QCA方法对营商环境的组态效应进行分析,揭示影响城市层面元宇宙企业数量与质量的复杂作用机制。研究发现:(1)城市高元宇宙企业数量或质量的提升,不能仅依赖某一项营商环境要素的优化,而需通过科学的政策组合,形成生态协同效应。(2)产生城市高元宇宙企业数量的路径有3条,即“市场逻辑下优势均衡型”“创新驱动型”和“市场环境下公共服务驱动型”;产生城市高元宇宙企业质量的路径同样存在3条,即“政务环境下公共服务驱动型”“政务环境与市场环境下创新驱动型”和“政府与市场双元逻辑下优势均衡型”,路径的不同,在于“量的合理增长”与“质的有效提升”需要的营商环境生态有差异。(3)城市高元宇宙企业数量或质量的提升难以通过单一营商环境组态同时实现,但通过向优秀学习有可能实现路径转型。本文研究为各城市因地制宜制定元宇宙企业培育政策提供理论依据。
The metaverse is an important symbol of strategic competitiveness within the national digital economy. How to optimize the city-level ecosystem of doing business to promote the high-quality development of metaverse firms is an important management problem to be explored. Taking 193 metaverse firms and their 49 cities as samples, and combined with the methods of NCA and QCA, this paper analyzed the configuration effects of doing business, and revealed the complex mechanism between the city-level ecosystem of doing business and the quantity and quality of metaverse firms. The conclusions are as follows: (1) Any single condition of ecosystem of doing business is not necessary for the quantity or quality of city-level metaverse firms. Instead, an effective "combination" strategy is essential to unleash the systematic synergy of ecosystem of doing business. (2) There are three paths to promote the high quantity of city-level metaverse firms, namely, "advantageous and balanced type under the market logic", "innovation-driven type" and "public-service-driven type under the market environment". Likewise, there are three paths to promote the high quality of city-level metaverse firms, namely, "public-service-driven type under the government environment", "innovation-driven type under the government environment and the market environment" and "advantageous and balanced type under the government and market dual logic". The difference in paths lies in the variation of ecosystem of doing business required by "reasonable growth in quantity" and "effective improvement in quality". (3) There is no single configuration that can simultaneously promote both high quantity and high quality of city-level metaverse firms, but it is possible to achieve path transformation through learning from excellence. The findings of the paper will help to provide some theoretical guidance for different cities to accelerate high-quality development of metaverse firms.
营商环境 / 元宇宙 / 高质量发展 / QCA / NCA
business environment / metaverse / high-quality development / QCA / NCA
| [1] |
李大元, 刘晓亮, 刘浏, 等. 元宇宙企业高质量发展的多元组态路径:基于TOE框架[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(7):3-17.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
钟业喜, 吴思雨. 元宇宙赋能数字经济高质量发展:基础、机理、路径与应用场景[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 28(4):1-12.
|
| [4] |
夏清华, 朱清. 增量提质:营商环境生态与专精特新企业:基于模糊集定性比较分析[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2023, 44(8):126-144.
|
| [5] |
杨晓光, 高自友, 盛昭瀚, 等. 复杂系统管理是中国特色管理学体系的重要组成部分[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(10):1-24.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
李志军. 2022中国城市营商环境报告[M]. 北京: 中国商业出版社, 2023.
|
| [8] |
陈西婵, 陈艳, 罗正英, 等. 营商环境、研发补贴与国有企业实质性创新[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(2):155-164.
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
谭海波, 范梓腾, 杜运周. 技术管理能力、注意力分配与地方政府网站建设:一项基于TOE框架的组态分析[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(9):81-94.
|
| [12] |
“中国城市营商环境评价研究”课题组, 李志军, 张世国, 等. 中国城市营商环境评价的理论逻辑、比较分析及对策建议[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5):98-112.
"Research on Evaluation of Doing Business in Chinese Cities" Research Group.
|
| [13] |
杜运周, 刘秋辰, 程建青. 什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度?:基于制度组态的分析[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(9):141-155.
|
| [14] |
杜运周, 刘秋辰, 陈凯薇, 等. 营商环境生态、全要素生产率与城市高质量发展的多元模式:基于复杂系统观的组态分析[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(9):127-145.
|
| [15] |
敦帅, 毛军权. 营商环境如何驱动“专精特新”中小企业培育?:基于组态视角的定性比较分析[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2023, 25(2):78-92.
|
| [16] |
董志强, 魏下海, 汤灿晴. 制度软环境与经济发展:基于30个大城市营商环境的经验研究[J]. 管理世界, 2012(4):9-20.
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
张三保, 康璧成, 张志学. 中国省份营商环境评价:指标体系与量化分析[J]. 经济管理, 2020, 42(4):5-19.
|
| [19] |
叶文平, 李新春, 陈强远. 流动人口对城市创业活跃度的影响:机制与证据[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(6):157-170.
|
| [20] |
夏明, 周文泳, 谢智敏. 城市数字经济高质量发展协同路径研究:基于技术经济范式的定性比较分析[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(3):65-74.
|
| [21] |
杜运周, 孙宁, 刘秋辰. 运用混合方法发展和分析复杂中介模型:以营商环境促进创新活力,协同新质生产力和“就业优先”为例[J]. 管理世界, 2024(6):217-235.
|
| [22] |
扬·杜尔. 必要条件分析法[M]. 杜运周, 等译. 上海: 格致出版社,上海人民出版社, 2022.
|
| [23] |
查尔斯C. 拉金. 重新设计社会科学研究[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2019.
|
| [24] |
杜运周, 贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界, 2017(6):155-167.
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
Theoretical “necessary but not sufficient” statements are common in the organizational sciences. Traditional data analyses approaches (e.g., correlation or multiple regression) are not appropriate for testing or inducing such statements. This article proposes necessary condition analysis (NCA) as a general and straightforward methodology for identifying necessary conditions in data sets. The article presents the logic and methodology of necessary but not sufficient contributions of organizational determinants (e.g., events, characteristics, resources, efforts) to a desired outcome (e.g., good performance). A necessary determinant must be present for achieving an outcome, but its presence is not sufficient to obtain that outcome. Without the necessary condition, there is guaranteed failure, which cannot be compensated by other determinants of the outcome. This logic and its related methodology are fundamentally different from the traditional sufficiency-based logic and methodology. Practical recommendations and free software are offered to support researchers to apply NCA.
|
| [27] |
杜运周, 李佳馨, 刘秋辰, 等. 复杂动态视角下的组态理论与QCA方法:研究进展与未来方向[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(3):180-197.
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
盛昭瀚, 于景元. 复杂系统管理:一个具有中国特色的管理学新领域[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(6):36-50.
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
