科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9): 104-113.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.09.011

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

制造企业形成新质生产力的组态路径研究

李庆雪1,2,宋萌萌1,刘丽娜1,张悦1   

  1. 1.哈尔滨理工大学经济与管理学院，黑龙江 哈尔滨150080；
    2.哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院，黑龙江 哈尔滨150001

  • 收稿日期:2024-03-25 修回日期:2024-08-14 出版日期:2024-09-20 发布日期:2024-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 刘丽娜
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目：“先进制造业服务化组织障碍成因及调节机制研究”（72302069，2024.01—2026.12）；中国科协青年人才托举工程：“制造业与服务业融合创新”（2023QNRC001，2024.01—2026.12）；国家社会科学基金青年项目：“数字经济时代中国全要素生产率增长的实现路径与政策体系研究”（21CJY025，2021.09—2024.06）；黑龙江省哲学社会科学基金党的二十大精神专题项目：“数字赋能黑龙江省农业社会化服务平台构建及其运行机制研究”（23GLA009，2023.12—2024.06）。

A study of the configuration paths for formation of new quality productivity in manufacturing enterprises

Li Qingxue1,2, Song Mengmeng1, Liu Lina1, Zhang Yue1   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, Heilongjiang, China;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2024-03-25 Revised:2024-08-14 Online:2024-09-20 Published:2024-09-10

摘要：     制造业作为核心物质生产部门，是实体经济的基础，亦是发展新质生产力的关键载体。探寻制造企业新质生产力的形成路径既是关键的现实问题，也是亟需探究的科学问题。本文基于新质生产力的内涵，采用必要条件分析（NCA）和模糊集定性比较分析（fsQCA）方法，以289家500强A股制造企业为例，探讨了技术革命性突破、生产要素创新性配置、产业深度转型升级三个层面下的条件因素交互作用形成的制造企业新质生产力组态路径。研究发现：第一，制造企业新质生产力的形成不存在必要条件；第二，制造企业新质生产力的形成路径可归纳为技术资源配置牵引型、技术禀赋协同拉动型、数字化推动型、产业集聚发展带动型四种，其中数字技术导向型分布最普遍；第三，结合非高水平新质生产力组态，制度创新作为核心条件贯穿高/非高水平新质生产力组态结果，绿色技术创新和制度创新是导致制造企业形成新质生产力失败的重要原因。研究结论有利于理解并深化制造企业新质生产力形成路径的复杂机理，促进制造业结构升级，为高质量发展提供内生动力。

关键词: 制造企业, 新质生产力, 组态路径, NCA, fsQCA

Abstract:    The manufacturing industry, as a core material production department, is the foundation of the real economy and also a key carrier for the development of new-quality productive forces. Exploring the formation path of new quality productivity in manufacturing enterprises is not only a key practical problem, but also an urgent scientific problem. Based on the connotation of new-quality productive forces, this paper adopted the methods of necessary condition analysis (NCA) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), taking 289 A-share manufacturing enterprises among the top 500 as examples, and discussed the configuration path of new quality productivity of manufacturing enterprises, which is formed by the interaction of conditions and factors under the three levels of technological revolutionary breakthrough, innovative allocation of production factors and deep industrial transformation and upgrading. The research findings are as follows: First, there are no necessary conditions for the formation of new-quality productive forces in manufacturing enterprises. Second, the formation paths of new-quality productive forces in manufacturing enterprises can be classified into four types: technology resource allocation-driven type, technology endowment synergy-driven type, digitalization-driven type, and industrial agglomeration development-driven type, among which the digital technology-oriented type is the most common. Third, combined with the non-high-level new-quality productive force configuration, institutional innovation, as a core condition, runs through the configuration results of high/non-high-level new-quality productive forces. Green technology innovation and institutional innovation are important reasons for the failure of manufacturing enterprises to form new-quality productive forces. The research conclusion will be conducive to understanding and deepening the complex mechanism of the formation path of new quality productivity in manufacturing enterprises, promoting the structural upgrading of manufacturing industry and providing internal driving force for high-quality development.

Key words: manufacturing enterprise, new quality productivity, configuration path, necessary condition analysis (NCA), fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)