制造企业关键核心技术创新机制研究——基于资源编排理论

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.01.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 关键核心技术创新是中国制造业从“制造”向“创造”转变的重要前提，也是破解“卡脖子”难题、应对“科技脱钩”的根本举措。本文基于资源编排理论，探究了初始创新资源紧缺的中小制造企业关键核心技术创新的路径与机制。研究发现：（1）依据驱动因素与资源条件不同，中小制造企业分别采取集聚型资源结构化、重构型资源能力化、开放型资源杠杆化的资源编排方式，内外资源编排行动匹配差异化机制有效推动关键核心技术创新。（2）中小制造企业采取正向适应性逻辑开展关键核心技术创新，趋向间隔性突破式创新与持续性微创新紧密结合的技术创新路径，企业在技术网络深度的精耕与市场运营广度的拓展中实现快速成长与高质量发展。本研究丰富了技术创新理论与资源编排理论，为中小制造企业开展关键核心技术创新提供指导。

关键词: 中小制造企业, 关键核心技术创新, 资源编排

Abstract: The manufacturing industry is the key to promoting high-quality economic development. Under the combined influence of the US technological suppression and the COVID-19, bottlenecks such as key core technology being restricted and reliance on imports of high-end manufacturing equipment have become increasingly prominent. Chinese manufacturing enterprises urgently need to carry out key core technology innovation and improve technology innovation capability. Therefore, exploring the effective path of key core technology innovation for manufacturing enterprises in the Chinese context has become an important issue.Key core technology means the technical system that controls the commanding heights of the industry technology. Existing research has focused on the key core technology of large enterprises, ignoring the important role of small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises. Therefore, it is urgent to deeply explore the breakthrough path and mechanism of key core technology innovation for small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises.In terms of overall development, resource orchestration links, combines and reconfigures innovation resources inside and outside, thus promoting key core technology innovation. In terms of specific mechanism, appropriate resource actions should be taken to ensure the successful achievement of technology innovation goals. Therefore, resource orchestration theory can fully reveal the evolutionary path and micro-mechanism of key core technology innovation in small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises.This study selected Himile as the case sample to explore how small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprise with a shortage of initial innovation resources can achieve key core technology innovation through resource orchestration. The research found that: firstly, depending on the driving factors and resource conditions, small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprise adopts the resource orchestration approaches of agglomerative resource structuring, reconfigurative resource bundling and open resource leveraging. Secondly, small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises adopt positive-adaptive logic to carry out key core technology innovation, and tend to the technology innovation path of combination of breakthrough innovation and micro-innovation.The theoretical contributions of this study are as follows: first, we constructed a theoretical model of key core technology innovation in small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises from a dynamic perspective, and deepened the theoretical research on technology innovation. Second, we proposed a technology innovation path that combines breakthrough innovation and micro-innovation, and analyzed the realization mechanism of micro-innovation to enrich the theoretical research. Third, we applied the resource orchestration theory to the research of key core technology innovation, and expanded the research on the relationship between resource orchestration and key core technology innovation.

Key words: small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprise, key core technology innovation, resource orchestration

田震陈寒松. 制造企业关键核心技术创新机制研究——基于资源编排理论[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(1): 31-41.

Tian Zhen, Chen Hansong. Research on the mechanism of key core technology innovation in manufacturing enterprises based on the resource orchestration theory[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(1): 31-41.

参考文献

[1]赵晶, 刘玉洁, 付珂语, 等.大型国企发挥产业链链长职能的路径与机制——基于特高压输电工程的案例研究[J].管理世界, 2022, 38(5):221-240
[2]单宇, 刘爽, 马宝龙.国产替代过程中关键核心技术的适应性重构机制——基于海信集团-视像技术的纵向案例研究[J].管理世界, 2023, 39(4):80-100
[3]王瑞琪, 原长弘.制造业领军企业关键核心技术突破因素——基于家中国制造业强企业的多案例研究[J].科技管理研究, 2022, 42(14):85-93
[4]Zong B, Fan C, Wang X, et al.G technologies: Key drivers,core requirements,system architectures,and enabling technologies[J].IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 2019, 14(3):18-27
[5]杨瑾, 李蕾.数字经济时代装备制造企业颠覆式创新模式——基于扎根理论的探索[J].中国科技论坛, 2022, (8):89-99
[6]苏敬勤.重视中小制造企业在解决卡脖子技术中的关键作用[J].中国科技论坛, 2020, (6):7-7
[7]谭劲松, 宋娟, 王可欣, 等.创新生态系统视角下核心企业突破关键核心技术“卡脖子”——以中国高速列车牵引系统为例[J].南开管理评论, , :1-28
[8]陈劲, 阳镇, 朱子钦.“十四五”时期“卡脖子”技术的破解: 识别框架、战略转向与突破路径[J].改革, 2020, (12):5-15
[9]刘欣, 陈松.技术后发企业工艺创新战略的演进——以上汽集团工艺创新实践为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2017, 38(1):134-141
[10]林润辉, 周常宝, 李康宏, 等.技术追赶过程中后发企业创新能力的构建——基于中国西电集团公司的案例研究[J].研究与发展管理, 2016, 28(1):40-51
[11]吴晓波, 许庆瑞.二次创新竞争模型与企业竞争战略分析[J].系统工程学报, 1995, 10(3):37-47
[12]张艺, 陈凯华, 朱桂龙.产学研合作与后发国家创新主体能力演变——以中国高铁产业为例[J].科学学研究, 2018, 36(10):1896-1913
[13]宋艳, 原长弘, 张树满.装备制造业领军企业如何突破关键核心技术[J].科学学研究, 2022, 40(3):420-432
[14]辜胜阻, 曹冬梅, 杨嵋.构建粤港澳大湾区创新生态系统的战略思考[J].中国软科学, 2018, (4):1-9
[15]欧阳桃花, 曾德麟.拨云见日——揭示中国盾构机技术赶超的艰辛与辉煌[J].管理世界, 2021, 37(8):194-207
[16]路风.冲破迷雾——揭开中国高铁技术进步之源[J].管理世界, 2019, 35(9):164-194
[17]赵耀升, 宋立丰, 毛基业, 等.北斗”闪耀——初探中国卫星导航产业发展之道[J].管理世界, 2021, 37(12):217-237
[18]郑刚, 莫康, 王颂, 等.吸收速度、互补资产链接与关键核心技术突破[J].科学学研究, 2023, 41(3):500-510
[19]胡登峰, 黄紫微, 冯楠, 等.关键核心技术突破与国产替代路径及机制——科大讯飞智能语音技术纵向案例研究[J].管理世界, 2022, 38(5):188-209
[20]Sirmon D G, Hitt M A, Ireland R D.Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box[J].Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(1):273-292
[21]张青, 华志兵.资源编排理论及其研究进展述评[J].经济管理, 2020, 42(9):193-208
[22]Sirmon D G, Hitt M A, Ireland R D, et al.Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth,depth and life cycle effects[J].Journal of Management, 2011, 37(5):1390-1412
[23]成琼文, 郭波武, 张延平, 等.后发企业智能制造技术标准竞争的动态过程机制——基于三一重工的纵向案例研究[J].管理世界, 2023, 39(4):119-139
[24]郑刚, 邓宛如, 王颂, 等.企业创新网络构建、演化与关键核心技术突破[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(7):85-95
[25]Eisenhardt K M.Building theories from case study research[J].The Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(4):532-550
[26]Mason J.Qualitative researching[M]. London: Sage, 2002.
[27]Eisenhardt K M, Graebner M E.Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(1):25-32
[28]Yin R K.Case study research: Design and methods[M]. CA: Sage Publications Inc, 2009.
[29]Gioia D A, Corley K G, Hamilton A L.Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology[J].Organizational Research Methods, 2013, 16(1):15-31
[30]March J G, Olsen J P.Ambiguity and choice in organizations[M]. Bergen, Norway: Universitesforlaget, 1976.
[31]苏敬勤, 林菁菁, 张雁鸣.节俭创新下的企业资源行动模式及机理研究[J].科学学研究, 2019, 37(6):1102-1111
[32]Lee K, Malerba F.Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems[J].Research Policy, 2017, 46(2):338-351
[33]张树满, 原长弘.制造业领军企业如何培育关键核心技术持续创新能力[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(4):103-110
[34]周青, 聂力兵, 毛崇峰, 等.中小企业微创新实现路径及其关键机制研究[J].科学学研究, 2020, 38(2):323-333
[35]Hamadi T, Leker J, Meerholz K.Emergence of innovation champions: Differences in the R&D collaboration process between science and industry[J].International Journal of Innovation Management, 2018, 22(8):1-17
[36]Badrinarayanan V, Ramachandran I, Madhavaram S.Resource orchestration and dynamic managerial capabilities: Focusing on sales managers as effective resource orchestrators[J].Journal of Personal Selling Sales Management, 2019, 39(1):23-41
[37]罗仲伟, 任国良, 焦豪, 等.动态能力、技术范式转变与创新战略——基于腾讯微信“整合”与“迭代”微创新的纵向案例分析[J].管理世界, 2014, 30(8):152-168
[38]霍影, 江晓林, 孙辉.基于关键核心技术突破的后发企业突破性创新研究[J].中国科技论坛, 2023, (2):60-70