母体发起型裂变企业组织惯例形成路径研究

孔海璞; 李志刚; 游晟; 张璐

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.09.012

PDF(1222 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9) : 114-123. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.09.012

论文

母体发起型裂变企业组织惯例形成路径研究

孔海璞¹,李志刚²,张璐³,游晟²

作者信息 +

A study on the formation path of organizational routines in spin-off start-ups initiated by parent enterprises

Kong Haipu¹, Li Zhigang², Zhang Lu³, Yu Cheng²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

母体发起型裂变企业在惯例继承方面具有优势，但是其惯例形成的具体方式和路径尚不明晰。本研究借助创业学习理论，对母体发起的两家不同类型的裂变企业进行对比研究，提炼归纳得到创业学习视角下母体发起型裂变企业组织惯例形成过程模型。研究发现：（1）母体发起型裂变企业组织惯例的形成路径有先与母体联动探索后选择利用以及先效仿母体后试错调整两条不同的路径。（2）惯例的形成过程包括起源、发展和稳定三个阶段，分别对应着惯例的触发情境、集体共识的形成和组织规范的形成。（3）母体发起型裂变企业的惯例形成过程也是大中小企业发挥各自优势的过程。研究结论加深了对裂变创业特殊性的理解，并拓展了组织惯例和创业学习的相关研究，对裂变创业驱动的大中小企业融通创新具有重要的理论和实践意义。

Abstract

The parent company′s proactive spin-off start-ups have an advantage in the inheritance of established routines. However, the specific methods and pathways through which its routines are formed remain unclear. With the help of entrepreneurial learning theory, this study conducted a double case comparative study on the organizational convention formation process of two different types of spin-off start-ups initiated by the parent, and summarized the organizational convention formation process model of spin-off start-ups from the perspective of entrepreneurial learning. The study found that: (1) The formation path of the organizational routines in parent-initiated spin-off start-ups includes two distinct routes: “exploring in conjunction with the parent company and then choosing to utilize” and “imitating the parent company and then adjusting through trial and error”. (2) The process of routine formation includes three stages, namely origination, development, and stabilization, and they correspond to the triggering context of the routine, formation of collective consensus, and establishment of organizational norms. (3) The routine formation process of parent-initiated spin-offs is also a process in which large, medium and small enterprises play their own advantages. The conclusions of this study will enhance the grasp of spin-off entrepreneurship′s unique dynamics and expand the research on organizational routines and entrepreneurial learning. They will also bear substantial theoretical and practical significance for the innovation-driven integration and growth of enterprises across scales, fostered by spin-off entrepreneurial initiatives.

导出引用

孔海璞, 李志刚, 张璐, 游晟. 母体发起型裂变企业组织惯例形成路径研究[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(9): 114-123 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.09.012

Kong Haipu, Li Zhigang, Zhang Lu, Yu Cheng. A study on the formation path of organizational routines in spin-off start-ups initiated by parent enterprises[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(9): 114-123 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.09.012

参考文献

[1]Fackler D, Schnabel C, Schmucker A.Spinoffs in Germany: Characteristics, Survival, and The Role of Their Parents[J].Small Business Economics, 2016, 46:93-114
[2]Furlan A, Grandinetti R.Can Routines Be Inherited? A Microfoundational Approach to Spinoffs[J].European Management Review, 2020, 17(4):885-899
[3]马鸿佳, 吴娟, 郭海, 等.创业领域即兴行为研究: 前因, 结果及边界条件[J].管理世界, 2021, 37(05):211-229
[4]Campbell B A, Ganco M, Franco A M, et al.Who Leaves,Where to,and Why Worry? Employee Mobility,Entrepreneurship and Effects on Source Firm Performance[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2012, 33(1):65-87
[5]杜鑫, 李志刚, 乔宝刚等.母体支持型裂变创业企业如何构建商业生态系统?——基于资源编排视角的双案例研究[J].外国经济与管理, 2022, 44(04):34-50
[6]谭智佳, 魏炜, 朱武祥.商业生态系统的构建与价值创造——小米智能硬件生态链案例分析[J].管理评论, 2019, 31(07):172-185
[7]陈逢文, 付龙望, 张露, 等.创业者个体学习, 组织学习如何交互影响企业创新行为?——基于整合视角的纵向单案例研究[J].管理世界, 2020, 36(3):142-163
[8]Crossan M M, Lane H W, White R E, et al.Organizational Learning: Dimensions for a Theory[J].The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 1995, 3(4):337-360
[9]Rerup C, Feldman M S.Routines as a Source of Change In Organizational Schemata: The Role of Trial-And-Error Learning[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(3):577-610
[10]李志刚, 杜鑫, 杨德林等.新创企业与在位企业视角下裂变创业研究评述与展望[J].管理学报, 2023, 20(03):461-472
[11]Klepper S, Sleeper S.Entry by Spinoffs[J].Management Science, 2005, 51(8):1291-1306
[12]李志刚, 许晨鹤, 刘振.商业模式传承型裂变创业内在机理研究[J].南开管理评论, 2017, 20(5):69-80
[13]Uzunca B.Biological Children Versus Stepchildren: Interorganizational Learning Processes of Spinoff and Nonspinoff Suppliers[J].Journal of Management, 2018, 44(8):3258-3287
[14]Buenstorf G.Opportunity Spin-Offs and Necessity Spin-Offs[J].International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 2009, 1(1):22-40
[15]Fackler D, Schnabel C, Schmucker A.Spinoffs in Germany: Characteristics, Survival, and The Role of Their Parents[J]. Small Business Economics, 2016, 46: 93-114.
[16]Ferriani S, Garnsey E, Lorenzoni G.Continuity and Change in a Spin-Off Venture: The Process of Reimprinting[J].Industrial and Corporate Change, 2012, 21(4):1011-1048
[17]李宇, 马征远.大企业内部创业“裂生式”与“创生式”战略路径——基于海尔和思科的双案例研究[J].中国工业经济, 2020, 392(11):99-117
[18]Feldman, Martha S., and Brian T. Pentland. " Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change." ?Administrative Science Quarterly?48.1 (2003): 94-118.
[19]Pentland B T, Feldman M S.Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis[J].Industrial and Corporate Change, 2005, 14(5):793-815
[20]肖瑶, 彭新敏, 李剑.知识-关系双网下的组织惯例创新机理研究[J].科学学研究, 2021, 39(04):758-768
[21]王永伟, 吴湘繁, 叶锦华, 刘雨展.变革型领导行为、组织认同与组织惯例更新:集体主义倾向的调节效应[J].管理评论, 2023, 35(01):209-221
[22]买忆媛, 叶竹馨, 陈淑华.从“兵来将挡, 水来土掩”到组织惯例形成——转型经济中新企业的即兴战略研究[J].管理世界, 2015, 263(8):147-165
[23]马鸿佳, 吴娟, 郎春婷.新创企业即兴行为到惯例的形成机理:基于创业学习视角[J].外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(11):116-128
[24]Gross, Uwe.Fighting The Fire: Improvisational Behavior during The Production Launch of New Products[J].International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2014, 34(6):749-722
[25]高洋, 葛宝山, 蒋大可.组织学习、惯例更新与竞争优势之间的关系——基于不同环境不确定水平的研究[J].科学学研究, 2017, 35(09):1386-1395
[26]徐萌, 蔡莉.新企业组织学习对惯例的影响研究——组织结构的调节作用[J].管理科学, 2016, 29(06):93-105
[27]马鸿佳, 吴娟, 唐思思.新创企业的即兴行为如何转化为惯例:创业学习与交互记忆系统的作用研究[J].南方经济, 2020, No.372(09):69-85
[28]林海芬, 陈梦雅, 曲廷琛.组织学习视角行业惯例的演化过程案例研究[J].科研管理, 2022, 43(02):137-148
[29]Agarwal R, Echambadi R, Franco A M, et al.Knowledge Transfer through Inheritance: Spin-Out Generation,Development,and Survival[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(4):501-522
[30]Agarwal R, Campbell B A, Franco A M, et al.What Do I Take with Me? The Mediating Effect of Spin-Out Team Size and Tenure on The Founder–Firm Performance Relationship[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2016, 59(3):1060-1087
[31]李志刚, 刘振, 于敏.国外裂变型新创企业绩效特点剖析与影响因素研究综述[J].外国经济与管理, 2012, 34(9):34-41
[32]Becker M C.Organizational Routines: a Review of The Literature[J].Industrial and Corporate Change, 2004, 13(4):643-678
[33]余浩, 刘文浩.组织惯例动态研究的主流质性方法述评与未来展望[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2020, 41(06):128-142
[34]Welch C, Piekkari R, Plakoyiannaki E, et al.Theorising from Case Studies: Towards a Pluralist Future for International Business Research[J].Journal of International Business Studies, 2011, 42(5):740-762
[35]Eisenhardt K M, Graebner M E.Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(1):25-32
[36]Yin R K.Case Study Research: Design and Methods[M]. sage, 2009.
[37]徐建平, 梅胜军.组织惯例研究综述——概念发展、内在结构与关键特征[J].技术经济与管理研究, 2020, No.285(04):80-84
[38]Wallin M W, Dahlstrand ? L.Sponsored Spin-Offs,Industrial Growth and Change[J].Technovation, 2006, 26(5-6):611-620
[39]Cirillo B.External Learning Strategies and Technological Search Output: Spinout Strategy and Corporate Invention Quality[J].Organization Science, 2019, 30(2):361-382
[40]March J G.Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science, 1991, 2(1):71-87
[41]李志刚, 宋敏, 崔连广等.裂变创业企业如何跨越双重合法性门槛？——基于组织身份视角的双案例对比研究[J].研究与发展管理, 2022, 34(02):149-163
[42]魏龙, 党兴华.惯例复制、网络闭包与创新催化:一个交互效应模型[J].南开管理评论, 2018, 21(03):165-175
[43]刘立娜, 于渤.知识和组织惯例互动演化视角下后发企业动态能力的微观基础[J].管理学报, 2019, 16(07):1044-1053
[44]王永伟, 马洁, 吴湘繁, 等.变革型领导行为, 组织学习倾向与组织惯例更新的关系研究[J].管理世界, 2012, 228(9):110-119
[45]米捷, 林润辉, 瞿皎姣.组织惯例的结构特征、内部干预和变化过程研究[J].管理评论, 2022, 34(06):243-256
[46]马鸿佳, 张弼弘, 郭帅辰.创业反思的形成过程与惯例更新关系的机制研究[J].管理学报, 2022, 19(06):883-891
[47]Bagley M J O.Networks,Geography and The Survival of The Firm[J].Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2019, 29(4):1173-1209