[1]Adomako S, Amankwah-Amoah J, Danso A, et al. R&D intensity, knowledge creation process and new product performance: The mediating role of international R&D teams[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 128: 719-727.[2]Baumann J, Kritikos A S. The link between R&D, innovation and productivity: Are micro firms different? [J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(6):1263-1274.[3]Baumann J, Kritikos A S. The link between R&D, innovation and productivity: Are micro firms different? [J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(6): 1263-1274.[4]Bergek A, Berggren C, Magnusson T, et al. Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: Destruction, disruption or creative accumulation? [J]. Research Policy, 2013, 42(6-7): 1210-1224.[5]Borgatti S, Everett M. Models of core/periphery structures[J]. Social Networks, 1999, 21(4): 375-395.[6]Bromiley P, Rau D, Zhang Y. Is R&D Risky? Strategic Management Journal, 2017,38(4): 876-891.[7]Burt R S. Structural holes[M]. Cambridge, M A: Harvard University Press, 1992.[8]Camison C, Villar-Lopez A. Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2014, 67(1): 2891-2902.[9]Chao R O, Kavadias S. R&D intensity and the new product development portfolio [J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2013, 60(4): 664-675.[10]Chen Y. Partial adjustment toward target R&D intensity[J]. R & D Management, 2018, 48(5): 591-602.[11]Cyert R M, March J G. A behavioral theory of the firm[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963. [12]Cyert R M, March J G. A behavioral theory of the firm[M]. Englewood Cliffs. N J: Prentice-Hall, 1963.[13]DOSI G. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 1988, 26(3): 1120-1171.[14]Evers N, O’Gorman C. Improvised internationalization in new ventures: The role of prior knowledge and networks[J]. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2011, 23(7-8):549-574.[15]Feng L, Qin G, Wang J, et al. Disruptive innovation path of start-ups in the digital context: The perspective of dynamic capabilities[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(19): 12839.[16]Feng L, Qin G, Wang J, et al. Disruptive innovation path of start-ups in the digital context: The perspective of dynamic capabilities[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(19): 12839.[17]Feng Y, Ma C Y, Wang Y S, et al. A double-edged sword: The effects of R&D intensity and capitalization on institutional investment in entrepreneurial firms[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13: 808.[18]Gnyawali D R, Madhavan R. Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001, 26(3): 431-445.[19]Greve H R. Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43(1):58-86.[20]Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth[J]. The Bell Journal of Economics, 1979, 10(1): 92-116.[21]Hall B H, Lerner J. The financing of R&D and innovation[J]. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 2010, 1(1C): 609-639.[22]Hall B H, Lotti F, Mairesse J. Innovation and productivity in SMEs: Empirical evidence for Italy[J]. Small Business Economics, 2009, 33(1): 13-33.[23]Hao J, Li C, Yuan R, et al. The influence of the knowledge-based network structure hole on enterprise innovation performance: The threshold effect of R&D investment intensity[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(15): 6155.[24]Helfat C E, Peteraf M A. Managerial cognitive capabilities and the micro-foundations of dynamic capabilities[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36( 6) : 831-850.[25]Kenis P, Knoke D. How organizational field networks shape interorganizational tie-formation rates[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2002, 27(2): 275-293.[26]Kereri J O, Harper C M. Social networks and construction teams: Literature review[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2019, 145(4): 3119001.[27]Kim D, Zhu P. Supplier supplier dependence and R&D intensity: The moderating role of network centrality and interconnectedness[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2018, 64: 7-18.[28]Kontinen T, Ojala A. Network ties in the international opportunity recognition of family SMEs[J]. International Business Review, 2011, 20(4):440-453.[29]Larcker D F, So E C, Wang C C Y. Boardroom centrality and firm performance[J]. Journal of Accounting & Eco-nomics, 2013, 55(2):225-250.[30]Larra?eta B, Zahra S A, González J L G. Enriching strategic variety in new ventures through external knowledge[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2012, 27(4): 401-413.[31]Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992, 13(S1): 111-125.[32]Lucas G J M, Knoben J, Meeus M T H. Contradictory yet coherent? Inconsistenc in performance feedback and R&D investment change[J]. Journal of Management, 2018, 44(2): 658-681.[33]Malerba F, Nelson R R, Orsenigo L, et al. Innovation and the evolution of industries: History-friendly models[M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016.[34]Mclean P D, Padgett J F. Obligation, risk, and opportunity in the renaissance economy: Beyond social embeddedness to network co-constitution[M]. Sociology of the economy, New York: Russell Sage, 2004.[35]Medcof J W, Lee T. The effects of the chief technology officer and firm and industry R&D intensity on organizational performance[J]. R&D Management, 2017, 47(5),767-781.[36]Min B S, Smyth R. How does leverage affect R&D intensity and how does R&D intensity impact on firm value in south Korea? [J]. Applied Economics, 2016, 48(58): 5667-5675.[37]Min S, Kim J, Sawng Y. The effect of innovation network size and public R&D investment on regional innovation efficiency[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2020, 155: 119998.[38]Ott T E, Eisenhardt K M. Decision weaving: Forming novel, complex strategy in entrepreneurial settings[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2020, 41(12): 2275-2314.[39]Singh S K, Del Giudice M, Nicotra M, et al. How firm performs under stakeholder pressure: Unpacking the role of absorptive capacity and innovation capability[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2022, 69(6): 1-12.[40]Strauss A L. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists [M]. Cambridge University Press, 1987.[41]Su H N, Moaniba I M. Does geographic distance to partners affect firm R&D spending? The moderating roles of individuals, firms, and countries[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2020, 106:12-23.[42]Teece D J. Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2012, 49(8): 1395-1401. [43]Wan P, Wang X, Min G, et al. Optimal control for positive and negative information diffusion based on game theory in online social networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 2023, 10(1): 426-440.[44]Wang D, Sutherland D, Ning L, et al. Exploring the influence of political connections and managerial overconfidence on R&D intensity in china's large-scale private sector firms[J].?Technovation,?2018, 69: 40-53.[45]Xie L, Zhou J, Zong Q, et al. Gender diversity in R&D teams and innovation efficiency: Role of the innovation context[J]. Research Policy, 2020, 49(1): 103885.[46]Xie X, Wang H, Jiao H. Non‐R&D innovation and firms’ new product performance: The joint moderating effect of R&D intensity and network embeddedness[J]. R & D Management, 2019, 49(5): 748-761.[47]Xu D, Zhou K Z, Du F. Deviant versus aspirational risk taking: The effects of performance feedback on bribery expenditure and R&D intensity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2019, 62(4): 1226-1251.[48]Yang C H, Hayakawa K. Localization and overseas R&D activity: the case of Taiwanese multinational enterprises in China[J]. R&D Management, 2015, 45 (2): 181-195.[49]白长虹,刘欢.旅游目的地精益服务模式:概念与路径——基于扎根理论的多案例探索性研究[J].南开管理评论,2019,22(03):137-147.[50]蔡莉,杨亚倩,詹天悦等.数字经济下创新驱动创业过程中认知、行为和能力的跨层面作用机制——基于三一集团的案例研究[J/OL].南开管理评论:1-24[2023-08-07].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.F. 20221027. 0959.002.html[51]杜丹丽,曾小春.速度特征视角的我国高新技术企业创新能力动态综合评价研究[J].科研管理,2017,38(07):44-53.[52]傅家骥.技术创新经济学[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 1998.[53]葛晶.高科技新创企业研发强度、网络关系与企业绩效——基于创新一致性的调节效应研究[J].经济纵横,2023(04):69-78.[54]耿红军,王昶.赶超型创新政策影响企业技术能力的路径研究[J/OL].科学学研究:1-19[2023-07-29].https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20230619.002.[55]胡琳娜,陈劲.整合式创新的框架及机理分析[J].科学管理研究,2020,38(04):2-9.[56]黄宏斌,翟淑萍,陈静楠.企业生命周期、融资方式与融资约束——基于投资者情绪调节效应的研究[J].金融研究,2016(07):96-112.[57]李璨,吕渭星,周长辉.绩效反馈与组织响应:文献综述与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2019,41(10):86-108.[58]李存斌,鲁平.基于云模型的电力企业技术创新能力评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2017,37(02):68-72.[59]李薇,龙勇.竞争性战略联盟的合作效应研究[J].科研管理,2010,31(01):160-169.[60]刘诗源,林志帆,冷志鹏.税收激励提高企业创新水平了吗?——基于企业生命周期理论的检验[J].经济研究,2020,55(06):105-121.[61]刘梓毓,杜玉申.基于PSM-DID模型的高新技术企业认定效果评价[J].科研管理,2023,44(04):85-92.[62]卢荻,唐鹂鸣.中美制造业研发强度:差距、成因及政策启示[J].经济学家,2023, 292(04):67-78.[63]罗家德,张田,任兵.基于“布局”理论视角的企业间社会网络结构与复杂适应[J].管理学报,2014, 11(09):1253-1264.[64]马鸿佳,吴娟.新创企业即兴行为和惯例对绩效的影响研究[J].管理学报,2020,17(09):1355-1363.[65]马胜杰.企业技术创新能力及其评价指标体系[J]数量经济技术经济研究.2002(12):5 -810[66]彭华涛,潘月怡,陈云.社会网络嵌入、双元均衡创新与国际创业研究[J].科研管理,2022,43(11):45-54.[67]曲小瑜,秦续天.基于tsQCA方法的制造业绿色技术创新能力多元提升路径研究[J].科技管理研究,2022,42(19):225-231.[68]唐孝文,孙悦,唐晓彬.中国高端装备制造业技术创新能力评价研究[J].科研管理,2021,42(09):1-9.[69]王俊娜,杨武.基于RPM三维模型的企业技术创新能力测度研究——以深圳市数字电视企业为例[J].科研管理,2011,32(06):1-10.[70]王子晨,吴丹丹,韩骞.科技自立自强视角下我国研发投入规模与结构分析研究[J].科学管理研究,2023,41(01):147-157.[71]卫武,倪慧.众创空间生态系统网络的强弱关系分析[J].科学管理研究,2020,38(02):24-28.[72]吴敬茹.创新驱动视角下我国制造业技术创新能力评价[J].工业技术经济,2020,39(10):74-80.[73]吴永林,高洪深,林晓言.企业技术创新能力的多级模糊综合评价[J].数量经济技术经济研究 2002,19(3):53 -56.[74]肖静华,吴小龙,谢康等.信息技术驱动中国制造转型升级——美的智能制造跨越式战略变革纵向案例研究[J].管理世界,2021,37(03):161-179+225+11.[75]徐建斌,彭瑞娟,何凡.政府创新补贴提升数字经济企业研发强度了吗?[J].经济管理,2023,45(04):172-190.[76]张宝建,胡海青,张道宏.企业创新网络的生成与进化——基于社会网络理论的视角[J].中国工业经济,2011, 277(04):117-126.[77]张宝建,孙国强,裴梦丹等.网络能力、网络结构与创业绩效——基于中国孵化产业的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2015,18(02):39-50.[78]张路蓬,薛澜,周源等.社会资本引导下的新兴产业技术扩散网络形成机理与实证研究[J].中国软科学,2019(03):34-45. |