PDF(1027 KB)
PDF(1027 KB)
PDF(1027 KB)
人工智能应用驱动企业新质生产力涌现——来自中国上市公司的微观证据
The emergence of enterprises' new quality productive forces driven by artificial intelligence applications: The micro-evidence from Chinese-listed companies
发展新质生产力,关键在于科技创新,重点在于产业升级,而当前由人工智能催生和引领的新一轮科技革命和产业变革,正为我国经济持续增长注入新动能。本文基于2009—2022年中国上市公司微观数据,构建了企业新质生产力指标体系,并运用双向固定效应模型从“创新”和“产业”两条路径实证检验人工智能应用对企业新质生产力的影响及其作用机制。研究发现:(1)人工智能应用从多维“新质生产要素”赋能并显著提升企业新质生产力;(2)作用机制显示,企业应用人工智能有利于开展实质性创新,无益于策略性创新,实质性创新正向中介并调节了人工智能应用对新质生产力的影响;(3)企业内部专业化分工和外部供应链效率在影响路径中发挥正向中介与调节作用,人工智能应用引致的产业链整合会激发新质生产力;(4)异质性分析表明,人工智能应用对企业新质生产力的影响在民营企业、制造业和竞争性行业企业中更明显。本文厘清了人工智能应用成效的创新动机差异,阐明了人工智能催生产业裂变和链式升级的作用机理,丰富了新质生产力影响因素与人工智能应用经济后果的相关研究,为企业抓住人工智能“牛鼻子”,驱动新质生产力涌现提供了重要政策启示。
The development of new quality productive forces (NQPF) hinges on the scientific and technological innovation, with a focus on industrial upgrading. The current wave of scientific and technological revolutions, driven by artificial intelligence (AI), is providing new momentum for China's sustained economic growth. Based on the micro-data from Chinese-listed companies from 2009 to 2022, this study constructed an NQPF index system and empirically tested the impact of AI applications on NQPF and its mechanisms via the "innovation" and "industry" pathways by using the two-way fixed effect model. The findings indicated that: (1) AI applications significantly enhance NQPF through multidimensional new quality factors of production; (2) the mechanism test showed that AI applications foster substantial innovation rather than strategic innovation, with substantial innovation positively mediating and moderating the impact of AI on NQPF; (3) the internal specialization and external supply chain efficiency also positively mediate and moderate this impact, while the AI-driven industrial chain integration stimulates NQPF; (4) the heterogeneity analysis revealed that AI's impact on NQPF is more pronounced in the private, manufacturing, and competitive industry firms. This study has clarified the differences in innovation motivation of AI application effectiveness, elucidated the mechanism of AI-induced industrial fission and chain upgrading, and enriched the research on NQPF influencing factors and the economic consequences of AI applications, which will provide important policy insights for leveraging AI to drive NQPF development.
人工智能应用 / 企业新质生产力 / 实质性创新效应 / 产业链整合效应
artificial intelligence application / enterprises' new quality productive force / substantial innovation effect / industry chain integration effect
| [1] |
石建勋, 徐玲. 加快形成新质生产力的重大战略意义及实现路径研究[J]. 财经问题研究, 2024(1):3-12.
|
| [2] |
周文, 许凌云. 论新质生产力:内涵特征与重要着力点[J]. 改革, 2023(10):1-13.
|
| [3] |
罗爽, 肖韵. 数字经济核心产业集聚赋能新质生产力发展:理论机制与实证检验[J]. 新疆社会科学, 2024(2):29-40.
|
| [4] |
宋佳, 张金昌, 潘艺. ESG发展对企业新质生产力影响的研究:来自中国A股上市企业的经验证据[J]. 当代经济管理, 2024(46):1-13.
|
| [5] |
We examine the concerns that new technologies will render labor redundant in a framework in which tasks previously performed by labor can be automated and new versions of existing tasks, in which labor has a comparative advantage, can be created. In a static version where capital is fixed and technology is exogenous, automation reduces employment and the labor share, and may even reduce wages, while the creation of new tasks has the opposite effects. Our full model endogenizes capital accumulation and the direction of research toward automation and the creation of new tasks. If the long-run rental rate of capital relative to the wage is sufficiently low, the long-run equilibrium involves automation of all tasks. Otherwise, there exists a stable balanced growth path in which the two types of innovations go hand-in-hand. Stability is a consequence of the fact that automation reduces the cost of producing using labor, and thus discourages further automation and encourages the creation of new tasks. In an extension with heterogeneous skills, we show that inequality increases during transitions driven both by faster automation and the introduction of new tasks, and characterize the conditions under which inequality stabilizes in the long run. (JEL D63, E22, E23, E24, J24, O33, O41)
|
| [6] |
杜传忠, 疏爽. 人工智能与经济高质量发展:机制、成效与政策取向[J]. 社会科学战线, 2023(12):78-87.
|
| [7] |
周杰琦, 陈达, 夏南新. 人工智能、产业结构优化与绿色发展效率:理论分析和经验证据[J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2023, 43(4):96-113.
|
| [8] |
王水兴, 刘勇. 智能生产力:一种新质生产力[J]. 当代经济研究, 2024(1):36-45.
|
| [9] |
杨思莹, 王冰冰. 工业智能化对劳动者职业伤害的影响研究[J]. 经济经纬, 2023, 40(1):78-87.
|
| [10] |
杨祎, 刘嫣然, 李垣. 替代或互补:人工智能应用管理对创新的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(4):46-54.
|
| [11] |
陈晓红, 张静辉, 汪阳洁, 等. 数字技术赋能中国式创新的机制与路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(1):13-20.
|
| [12] |
李佳霖, 董嘉昌. 地方政府注意力配置对企业创新活动的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(9):47-59.
|
| [13] |
施炳展, 李建桐. 互联网是否促进了分工:来自中国制造业企业的证据[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(4):130-149.
|
| [14] |
张任之. 数字技术与供应链效率:理论机制与经验证据[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2022, 43(5):60-76.
|
| [15] |
何德旭, 张斌彬. 居民杠杆与企业债务风险[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(2):155-173.
|
| [16] |
睢博, 雷宏振. 工业智能化能促进企业技术创新吗?:基于中国2010—2019年上市公司数据的分析[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 50(3):130-140.
|
| [17] |
吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现:来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7):130-144.
|
| [18] |
袁淳, 肖土盛, 耿春晓, 等. 数字化转型与企业分工:专业化还是纵向一体化[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(9):137-155.
|
| [19] |
张树山, 张佩雯, 谷城. 企业数字化转型与供应链效率[J]. 统计与决策, 2023, 39(18):169-173.
|
| [20] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |