研究以新一代信息技术产业领军企业华为技术有限公司为例，探究基于标准竞合的创新网络合法性获取的内在机理和动态机制。研究发现，跨国企业在标准国际化不同阶段构建的基于标准竞合的创新网络模式在焦点合法性评估者制度逻辑触发下呈现“利用型—探索型—主导型—自主可控型”的阶段性演化。阶段性构建的上述网络及形成的标准化能力、竞合能力和网络编排能力是跨国企业动态获取合法性的内在机理。形成上述核心能力水平及能力整合深度是跨越合法性阈值的动态机制。研究解析了标准国际化背景下合法性动态获取及阈值跨越的过程机理，为新一代信息技术跨国企业合法性获取提供重要启示。

This study focuses on exploring the dynamic acquisition of organizational legitimacy in multinational corporations through innovation networks based on standard competition and cooperation. A vertical single case study was conducted on Huawei Technology Co., Ltd., a leading enterprise in the new generation of information technology industry, to explore the internal and dynamic mechanisms of obtaining the legitimacy of innovative networks based on standard competition and cooperation. Research has found that, The innovation network model based on standard competition and cooperation constructed by multinational enterprises at different stages of standard internationalization is triggered by the institutional logic of "professional logic, market logic, community logic, and national logic" of the focus legitimacy evaluator, presenting "utilization standard competitive-cooperative innovation network—exploratory standard competitive-cooperative innovation network—dominant standard competitive-cooperative innovation network—autonomous and controllable standard competitive-cooperative innovation network". The utilization standard competitive-cooperative innovation network constructed by Huawei in stages based on standard competition and cooperation, as well as the formed standard tracking capability and network orchestration capability obtained from network resource assessment, are the internal mechanisms for multinational enterprises to dynamically obtain regulatory legitimacy. The exploratory standard competitive-cooperative innovation network based on standard competition and cooperation built by Huawei, as well as the capability to integrate standards, arrange network resources for migration, and lead cooperation, are the internal mechanisms for multinational enterprises to dynamically obtain normative legitimacy. The dominant standard competitive-cooperative innovation network built by Huawei based on standard competition and cooperation and the formed standard dominant capability, network orchestration capability obtained from network innovation resource exclusive, and competition dominant competition and cooperation capability are the internal mechanisms for multinational enterprises to dynamically obtain cognitive legitimacy. The autonomous and controllable standard competitive-cooperative innovation network built by Huawei based on standard competition and cooperation and the formed standard independent and controllable capability, stable network arrangement capability, and balanced competition and cooperation capability are the internal mechanisms for multinational enterprises to dynamically obtain new legitimacy after transition. The core competency level and integration depth formed by innovation networks based on standard competition and cooperation in different modes are dynamic mechanisms that cross legitimacy thresholds. The two low-level core competencies formed during the 1G and 2G periods are dynamic mechanisms for breaking through regulatory legitimacy thresholds in the early stages of standard internationalization. During the 3G era, three types of mid-level core competencies were formed, and the low degree of integration of capabilities was a dynamic mechanism that broke through the threshold of normative legitimacy. The three high-order core competencies formed before 4G and 5G present a dynamic mechanism of moderate integration of capabilities that breaks through the threshold of cognitive legitimacy. The three high-order core competencies formed in the post 5G era exhibit a highly integrated capability, which is a dynamic mechanism for breaking through the new legitimacy threshold after the transition. This study analyzes the process mechanism of multi-stage legitimacy dynamic acquisition and threshold crossing under the background of standard internationalization, providing important insights for the new generation of information technology industry multinational enterprises to use innovation networks based on standard competition and cooperation as legitimacy acquisition strategies.

Technical standards in the mobile communications industry have been developed from national to regional and from regional to global. In the current era, global standards in the industry have enabled the formation of a single global market. However, because standard essential patents (SEPs) are territorial given the nature of the patent system, they can function as an opportunity or a threat depending on whether or not they are protected in countries of interest. This paper investigates how W-CDMA and LTE SEPs are globally distributed. From the analysis, the current study discovers SEP owners' strategies, future opportunities, and threats in their international businesses.

科技自立自强与开放创新辩证统一。“双循环”新发展格局为两者的协同发展提供了新思路和战略载体，对于建设世界科技强国意义重大。从系统论看，国内、国际创新活动具有整体性、关联性、开放性、动态平衡性、1+1>2非加和性等特征。“科学-技术-市场”理论框架中，三个子系统互相衔接、有效联动、协同作用是实现自立与开放协同的基础。“内循环”与“外循环”协同和“自立”与“开放”协同具有内在逻辑的统一性。“双循环”格局下促进自立与开放协同的路径包括：一是合作模式多元化：加强基础研究的国际合作，推动“外循环”下大小循环相结合的多元开放模式。二是内部协作高效化：弥合国内产学研协同创新链“断裂”，提升“内循环”下的科技自立自强。三是内外循环协同化：以内促外，以外提内，科技自立自强与开放创新双轮驱动。

the dialectical unity of scientific and technological self-reliance and open innovation. The new development pattern of "double cycle" provides new ideas and strategic carriers for the coordinated development of the two, which is of great significance for building a world scientific and technological power. The thought of system theory is the theoretical basis of the organic coordination between scientific and technological self-reliance and open innovation under the pattern of "double circulation". The three subsystems of "science technology market" are interconnected, effectively linked and synergetic, which is the theoretical framework of self-reliance and open synergy under the new pattern of "double cycle". The coordination paths of the two include: first, strengthen international cooperation in basic research and promote the diversified open mode of combining large and small cycles under the "external cycle"; Second, efficient internal cooperation: bridge the "fracture" of the domestic industry university research association's co innovation chain and improve the self-reliance of science and technology under the "internal cycle"; Third, the coordination of internal and external circulation: promoting the outside from the inside and promoting the inside from the outside, and the two wheel drive of scientific and technological self-reliance and open innovation.