股权激励计划对国有企业创新的影响研究

李连伟, 纪骁鹏, 吕镯, 郭园园

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9) : 175-183.

PDF(1050 KB)
PDF(1050 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9) : 175-183. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.09.018

股权激励计划对国有企业创新的影响研究

作者信息 +

Research on the impact of equity incentive plan on promoting innovation of state-owned enterprises

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

提高国有高层次人才与企业创新水平是实施创新驱动发展战略和推动经济高质量发展的重要微观基础。本文以2006—2021年期间的A股国有控股上市公司为样本,采用逐年倾向得分匹配法和多期双重差分模型,实证检验了股权激励计划对国有企业创新活动的影响。研究结果显示,实施股权激励计划显著提高了国有企业研发投入,并且在股票流动性低、行业竞争程度高、混改程度高以及处于成熟期的国有企业表现更为显著;机制检验表明,股权激励计划主要通过提高企业内部控制质量和高管风险承担水平以及克服高管短视化倾向来提高国有企业研发投入;进一步研究发现,股权激励计划主要提高了国有企业探索性创新,而非开发性创新,同时也提高了国有企业创新效率与创新产出,并表现为“量质齐升”的创新策略。本文从股权激励的角度丰富了国有企业创新的激励机制研究,并从企业创新的角度为相关部门制定一系列政策文件以推动国有企业实施股权激励计划提供了参考依据。

Abstract

Improving the innovation level of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) is an important micro foundation for implementing the strategy of innovation-driven development and promoting high quality economic development. This paper uses a sample of A-share state-controlled listed companies for the period 2006-2021, and empirically examined the impact of equity incentive plan on the innovation activities of SOEs by using the year-by-year propensity score matching method and multi-period difference-in-difference model. The findings demonstrated that the adoption of the equity incentive plan considerably raises SOEs' R&D expenditures, and that this effect is more notable in SOEs with low stock liquidity, high industry competitiveness, high degree of mixed ownership reform and in the mature stage. The mechanism test showed that the equity incentive plan mainly improves the R&D investment of SOEs by improving the quality of internal control and the level of risk-taking of executives, and overcoming the shortsighted tendency of executives. Further research revealed that the equity incentive plan mainly enhances the exploratory innovation investment rather than the exploitative innovation investment, and also improves the innovation efficiency and innovation output of SOEs, which reflects the innovation strategy of "raising quantity and quality together". This paper has enriched the research on the incentive mechanism of SOEs' innovation from the perspective of equity incentives, and will provide some theoretical references and empirical evidence for the relevant departments to formulate a series of policy documents to promote the implementation of equity incentive plans in SOEs from the perspective of enterprise innovation.

关键词

股权激励计划 / 国有企业 / 创新投入 / 创新效率 / 创新产出

Key words

equity incentive plan / state-owned enterprise (SOE) / innovation input / innovation efficiency / innovation output

引用本文

导出引用
李连伟, 纪骁鹏, 吕镯, . 股权激励计划对国有企业创新的影响研究[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(9): 175-183 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.09.018
Li Lianwei, Ji Xiaopeng, Lyu Zhuo, et al. Research on the impact of equity incentive plan on promoting innovation of state-owned enterprises[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(9): 175-183 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.09.018
中图分类号: F276.1   

参考文献

[1]
XIA W, ZHOU X. Research on the impact of mixed ownership reform on innovation of state-owned enterprises: Evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022, 10:978090.
[2]
刘灿雷, 王若兰, 王永进. 国企监管模式改革的创新驱动效应[J]. 世界经济, 2020, 43(11):102-126.
LIU Canlei, WANG Ruolan, WANG Yongjin. Innovation-driven effects of theSOE supervision system reform[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2020, 43(11):102-126.
[3]
杨兴全, 李文聪, 尹兴强. 国资管理体制改革与国企创新:基于“两类公司”设立的证据[J]. 经济管理, 2022, 44(6):24-42.
YANG Xingquan, LI Wencong, YIN Xingqiang. Reform of state-owned capital and SOEs' innovation: Evidence from the establishment of two types of companies[J]. Business and Management Journal, 2022, 44(6):24-42.
[4]
ZOU J X. Implementation of EVA assessment and enterprise innovation:Empirical study based on panel data[C]// 2020 2nd International Conference on Economic Management and Model Engineering (ICEMME). IEEE, 2020:969-972.
[5]
江轩宇. 政府放权与国有企业创新:基于地方国企金字塔结构视角的研究[J]. 管理世界, 2016(9):120-135.
JIANG Xuanyu. Government decentralization and innovation of state owned enterprises: A study based on the pyramid structure of local state owned enterprises[J]. Journal of Management World, 2016(9):120-135.
[6]
郑国洪, 肖忠意, 陈海涛. 国家审计与央企控股上市公司创新质量[J]. 审计研究, 2022(5): 25-36.
ZHENG Guohong, XIAO Zhongyi, CHEN Haitao. The impact of government audit on the innovation quality of listed companies controlled by central SOEs[J]. Auditing Research, 2022(5):25-36.
[7]
WANG L, KONG D, ZHANG J. Does the political promotion of local officials impede corporate innovation?[J]. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2021, 57(4):1159-1181.
[8]
毛新述, 从阓匀, 张晨宇, 等. 国企高管薪酬职务倒挂影响企业创新吗?[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023:1-30[2023-06-06]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.F.20230216.0955.002.html.
MAO Xinshu, CONG Huiyun, ZHANG Chenyu, et al. Can pay-position upside down of soes affect corporate innovation?[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2023:1-30[2023-06-06]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.F.20230216.0955.002.html.
[9]
曹春方, 张超. 产权权利束分割与国企创新:基于中央企业分红权激励改革的证据[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(9):155-168.
CAO Chunfang, ZHANG Chao. Partitioning of property rights and the innovation of state-owned enterprises:A quasi natural experiment of bonus incentives reform in central government-owned enterprises[J]. Journal of Management World, 2020, 36(9):155-168.
[10]
杨天宇, 朱光. 容错机制能促进国有企业创新吗[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2022, 42(10):4-16.
YANG Tianyu, ZHU Guang. Can fault-tolerant mechanism promote the innovation of SOEs[J]. Economic Theory and Business Management, 2022, 42(10):4-16.
How to improve the innovation ability of stateowned enterprises is a controversial issueBased on the faulttolerant mechanism implemented by stateowned enterprises,this paper studies the innovation of stateowned enterprisesBy constructing a dynamic game model and solving the Nash equilibrium,this paper puts forward two theoretical hypotheses:(1) positive incentive can improve the lowrisk innovation incentive of SOE executives,but cannot improve their highrisk innovation incentive;(2) the combination of positive incentive and faulttolerant mechanism can promote the highrisk innovation incentive of SOE executivesEmpirically,taking the establishment of faulttolerant mechanism implemented by central enterprises as a quasinatural experiment,this paper uses the data of listed companies actually controlled by central enterprises from 2013 to 2019 and adopts multiperiod DID method to verify the above hypothesisFurther research shows that when an enterprise is in a competitive industry or its executives are younger,the promotion effect of fault tolerance mechanism on highrisk innovation investment is strongerThe findings not only provide a new perspective for improving the innovation ability of SOEs,but also provide a basis for optimizing their faulttolerant mechanism
[11]
刘张发. 在职消费、过度投资与国有企业创新投入[J]. 财经论丛, 2020(8): 63-72.
摘要
文章结合中国实施创新驱动发展战略及国有企业“限薪令”的现实背景,考察了高管在职消费强度对国有企业创新投入的影响及其机制。研究发现:(1)在职消费强度、异常在职消费强度对国有企业创新投入存在一定的积极作用;(2)与民营企业不同,因国有企业承担众多政府任务而明显存在过度投资,国有企业在职消费强度的提高对过度投资产生负向影响,为企业争取了更多创新资源,进而对创新投入产生正向影响。
LIU Zhangfa. Perks, over-investment and state-owned enterprise innovation investment[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2020(8):63-72.
[12]
田轩, 孟清扬. 股权激励计划能促进企业创新吗[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, 21(3):176-190.
TIAN Xuan, MENG Qingyang. Do stock incentive schemes spur corporate innovation[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2018, 21(3):176-190.
[13]
李连伟, 吕镯, 任浩锋, 等. 股权激励计划与企业创新:基于契约异质性视角的检验[J]. 中国经济学, 2022, (3):168-216.
摘要
随着我国股权激励制度的实践和创新驱动发展战略的实施,股权激励对企业创新的影响机理与制度优化成为亟待解决的问题。本文基于契约异质性视角,采用多期倾向得分匹配—双重差分(PSM-DID)方法检验了股权激励计划对企业创新的影响。研究发现,股权激励计划显著提高了企业创新投入和创新产出水平,并且提高了成长期和成熟期企业的创新投入以及成熟期企业的创新产出。影响机制检验发现,股权激励计划主要通过提高企业风险承担水平和创新团队稳定性、强化利益协同效应和监督效应机制来提高企业创新水平。进一步研究发现,股权激励计划对企业创新产出的促进效应更多地表现为“量质齐升”的创新策略,并且主要是由创新投入增加引起的,而不是由创新效率提高驱动的。本文对优化我国上市公司创新导向型股权激励机制设计,推动国家创新驱动发展战略实施具有重要意义。
LI Lianwei, LYU Zhuo, REN Haofeng, et al. Equity incentive plans and corporate innovation:A test based on contractual heterogeneity perspective[J]. Journal of China Economics, 2022, (3):168-216.
[14]
刘运国, 郑巧, 蔡贵龙. 非国有股东提高了国有企业的内部控制质量吗?:来自国有上市公司的经验证据[J]. 会计研究, 2016(11):61-68+96.
LIU Yunguo, ZHENG Qiao, CAI Guilong. Do non-state-owned shareholders improve the internal control quality in soes?[J]. Accounting Research, 2016(11):61-68+96.
[15]
冯璐, 张泠然, 段志明. 混合所有制改革下的非国有股东治理与国企创新[J]. 中国软科学, 2021(3):124-140.
FENG Lu, ZHANG Lingran, DUAN Zhiming. The governance of non-state shareholders and enterprises and enterprise innovation under the reform of mixed-ownership[J]. China Soft Science, 2021(3):124-140.
[16]
金宇超, 靳庆鲁, 宣扬. “不作为”或“急于表现”:企业投资中的政治动机[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(10):126-139.
JIN Yuchao, JIN Qinglu, XUAN Yang. To be inactive or overactive: Political incentives in firm investment[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2016, 51(10):126-139.
[17]
CORE J E, HOLTHAUSEN R W, LARCKER D F. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1999, 51(2):141-152.
[18]
BALSAM S, JIANG W, LU B. Equity incentives and internal control weaknesses[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2014, 31(1):178-201.
[19]
逯东, 王运陈, 付鹏. CEO激励提高了内部控制有效性吗?:来自国有上市公司的经验证据[J]. 会计研究, 2014, (6):66-72+97.
LU Dong, WANG Yunchen, FU Peng. Do CEO incentives improve the effectiveness of internal control:Empirical evidence from listed state-owned enterprises[J]. Accounting Research, 2014(6):66-72+97.
[20]
李萍, 舒伟, 唐清泉, 等. 内部控制能提高企业R&D投资的价值相关性吗?[J]. 中国会计评论, 2015(3):325-346.
LI Ping, SHU Wei, TANG Qingquan, et al. Can internal control improve the co-relation between R&D investment and firm's value[J]. China Accounting Review, 2015(3):325-346.
[21]
KEMPF A, RUENZI S, THIELE T. Employment risk, compensation incentives, and managerial risk taking: Evidence from the mutual fund industry[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2009, 92(1):92-108.
[22]
苏坤. 管理层股权激励、风险承担与资本配置效率[J]. 管理科学, 2015, 28(3)14-25.
SU Kun. Management equity incentive, risk taking and efficiency of capital allocation[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2015, 28(3):14-25.
[23]
MANSO G. Motivating innovation[J]. Journal of Finance, 2011, 66(5):1823-1860.
[24]
余海宗, 吴艳玲. 合约期内股权激励与内部控制有效性:基于股票期权和限制性股票的视角[J]. 审计研究, 2015(5):57-67.
YU Haizong, WU Yanling. Equity incentive during the period of contract and internal control effectiveness[J]. Auditing Research, 2015(5):57-67.
[25]
李春瑜. 国有控股企业限薪影响及股权激励调节作用[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(2):101-111.
LI Chunyu. The impact of “salary limited” and the regulating effect of equity incentive in state-owned enterprises[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 23(2):101-111.
[26]
李小荣, 张瑞君. 股权激励影响风险承担:代理成本还是风险规避?[J]. 会计研究, 2014(1):57-63+95.
LI Xiaorong, ZHANG Ruijun. Equity incentives influence risk-taking:Agency cost or risk averse?[J]. Accounting Research, 2014(1):57-63+95.
[27]
胡楠, 薛付婧, 王昊楠. 管理者短视主义影响企业长期投资吗?:基于文本分析和机器学习[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5)139-156+11+19-21.
HU Nan, XUE Fujing, WANG Haonan. Does managerial myopia affect long-term investment? Based on text analysis and machine learning[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37(5)139-156+11+19-21.
[28]
赵世芳, 江旭, 应千伟, 等. 股权激励能抑制高管的急功近利倾向吗:基于企业创新的视角[J]. 南开管理评论, 2020, 23(6):76-87.
ZHAO Shifang, JIANG Xu, YING Qianwei, et al. Can equity incentives restrain executives from chasing short-term interests?Based on the perspective of firm innovation[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2020, 23(6):76-87.
[29]
蔡贵龙, 郑国坚, 马新啸, 等. 国有企业的政府放权意愿与混合所有制改革[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(9):99-115.
CAI Guilong, ZHENG Guojian, MA Xinxiao, et al. Decentralization and mixed-ownership reform in China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2018, 53(9):99-115.
[30]
毕晓方, 翟淑萍, 姜宝强. 政府补贴、财务冗余对高新技术企业双元创新的影响[J]. 会计研究, 2017(1):46-52+95.
BI Xiaofang, ZHAI Shuping, JIANG Baoqiang. Government subsidies, financial slack and ambidextrous innovation[J]. Accounting Research, 2017(1):46-52+95.
[31]
MCGRATH R G. Exploring learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(1):118-131.
[32]
权小锋, 尹洪英. 中国式卖空机制与公司创新:基于融资融券分步扩容的自然实验[J]. 管理世界, 2017, (1):128-144+187-188.
QUAN Xiaofeng, YIN Hongying. Chinese short selling mechanism and corporate innovation:A natural experiment from Chinese margin trading program[J]. Journal of Management World, 2017, (1):128-144+187-188.

基金

国家自然科学基金青年项目:“股权激励对企业创新的影响机理与制度优化研究”(71904107,2020.01—2022.12)
“股权激励影响国有企业全要素生产率的机理、路径与制度优化研究”(72102129,2022.01—2024.12)
“融资约束下研发投资结构对企业生产率的影响机理研究:基于研发异质性及企业家知识溢出机制”(71804096,2019.01—2021.12)
“股权激励契约条款与企业生命周期的适应性匹配研究”(72002190,2021.01—2023.12)

PDF(1050 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/