PDF(1050 KB)
PDF(1050 KB)
PDF(1050 KB)
股权激励计划对国有企业创新的影响研究
Research on the impact of equity incentive plan on promoting innovation of state-owned enterprises
提高国有高层次人才与企业创新水平是实施创新驱动发展战略和推动经济高质量发展的重要微观基础。本文以2006—2021年期间的A股国有控股上市公司为样本,采用逐年倾向得分匹配法和多期双重差分模型,实证检验了股权激励计划对国有企业创新活动的影响。研究结果显示,实施股权激励计划显著提高了国有企业研发投入,并且在股票流动性低、行业竞争程度高、混改程度高以及处于成熟期的国有企业表现更为显著;机制检验表明,股权激励计划主要通过提高企业内部控制质量和高管风险承担水平以及克服高管短视化倾向来提高国有企业研发投入;进一步研究发现,股权激励计划主要提高了国有企业探索性创新,而非开发性创新,同时也提高了国有企业创新效率与创新产出,并表现为“量质齐升”的创新策略。本文从股权激励的角度丰富了国有企业创新的激励机制研究,并从企业创新的角度为相关部门制定一系列政策文件以推动国有企业实施股权激励计划提供了参考依据。
Improving the innovation level of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) is an important micro foundation for implementing the strategy of innovation-driven development and promoting high quality economic development. This paper uses a sample of A-share state-controlled listed companies for the period 2006-2021, and empirically examined the impact of equity incentive plan on the innovation activities of SOEs by using the year-by-year propensity score matching method and multi-period difference-in-difference model. The findings demonstrated that the adoption of the equity incentive plan considerably raises SOEs' R&D expenditures, and that this effect is more notable in SOEs with low stock liquidity, high industry competitiveness, high degree of mixed ownership reform and in the mature stage. The mechanism test showed that the equity incentive plan mainly improves the R&D investment of SOEs by improving the quality of internal control and the level of risk-taking of executives, and overcoming the shortsighted tendency of executives. Further research revealed that the equity incentive plan mainly enhances the exploratory innovation investment rather than the exploitative innovation investment, and also improves the innovation efficiency and innovation output of SOEs, which reflects the innovation strategy of "raising quantity and quality together". This paper has enriched the research on the incentive mechanism of SOEs' innovation from the perspective of equity incentives, and will provide some theoretical references and empirical evidence for the relevant departments to formulate a series of policy documents to promote the implementation of equity incentive plans in SOEs from the perspective of enterprise innovation.
股权激励计划 / 国有企业 / 创新投入 / 创新效率 / 创新产出
equity incentive plan / state-owned enterprise (SOE) / innovation input / innovation efficiency / innovation output
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
刘灿雷, 王若兰, 王永进. 国企监管模式改革的创新驱动效应[J]. 世界经济, 2020, 43(11):102-126.
|
| [3] |
杨兴全, 李文聪, 尹兴强. 国资管理体制改革与国企创新:基于“两类公司”设立的证据[J]. 经济管理, 2022, 44(6):24-42.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
江轩宇. 政府放权与国有企业创新:基于地方国企金字塔结构视角的研究[J]. 管理世界, 2016(9):120-135.
|
| [6] |
郑国洪, 肖忠意, 陈海涛. 国家审计与央企控股上市公司创新质量[J]. 审计研究, 2022(5): 25-36.
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
毛新述, 从阓匀, 张晨宇, 等. 国企高管薪酬职务倒挂影响企业创新吗?[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023:1-30[2023-06-06]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.F.20230216.0955.002.html.
|
| [9] |
曹春方, 张超. 产权权利束分割与国企创新:基于中央企业分红权激励改革的证据[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(9):155-168.
|
| [10] |
杨天宇, 朱光. 容错机制能促进国有企业创新吗[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2022, 42(10):4-16.
How to improve the innovation ability of stateowned enterprises is a controversial issueBased on the faulttolerant mechanism implemented by stateowned enterprises,this paper studies the innovation of stateowned enterprisesBy constructing a dynamic game model and solving the Nash equilibrium,this paper puts forward two theoretical hypotheses:(1) positive incentive can improve the lowrisk innovation incentive of SOE executives,but cannot improve their highrisk innovation incentive;(2) the combination of positive incentive and faulttolerant mechanism can promote the highrisk innovation incentive of SOE executivesEmpirically,taking the establishment of faulttolerant mechanism implemented by central enterprises as a quasinatural experiment,this paper uses the data of listed companies actually controlled by central enterprises from 2013 to 2019 and adopts multiperiod DID method to verify the above hypothesisFurther research shows that when an enterprise is in a competitive industry or its executives are younger,the promotion effect of fault tolerance mechanism on highrisk innovation investment is strongerThe findings not only provide a new perspective for improving the innovation ability of SOEs,but also provide a basis for optimizing their faulttolerant mechanism
|
| [11] |
刘张发. 在职消费、过度投资与国有企业创新投入[J]. 财经论丛, 2020(8): 63-72.
文章结合中国实施创新驱动发展战略及国有企业“限薪令”的现实背景,考察了高管在职消费强度对国有企业创新投入的影响及其机制。研究发现:(1)在职消费强度、异常在职消费强度对国有企业创新投入存在一定的积极作用;(2)与民营企业不同,因国有企业承担众多政府任务而明显存在过度投资,国有企业在职消费强度的提高对过度投资产生负向影响,为企业争取了更多创新资源,进而对创新投入产生正向影响。
|
| [12] |
田轩, 孟清扬. 股权激励计划能促进企业创新吗[J]. 南开管理评论, 2018, 21(3):176-190.
|
| [13] |
李连伟, 吕镯, 任浩锋, 等. 股权激励计划与企业创新:基于契约异质性视角的检验[J]. 中国经济学, 2022, (3):168-216.
随着我国股权激励制度的实践和创新驱动发展战略的实施,股权激励对企业创新的影响机理与制度优化成为亟待解决的问题。本文基于契约异质性视角,采用多期倾向得分匹配—双重差分(PSM-DID)方法检验了股权激励计划对企业创新的影响。研究发现,股权激励计划显著提高了企业创新投入和创新产出水平,并且提高了成长期和成熟期企业的创新投入以及成熟期企业的创新产出。影响机制检验发现,股权激励计划主要通过提高企业风险承担水平和创新团队稳定性、强化利益协同效应和监督效应机制来提高企业创新水平。进一步研究发现,股权激励计划对企业创新产出的促进效应更多地表现为“量质齐升”的创新策略,并且主要是由创新投入增加引起的,而不是由创新效率提高驱动的。本文对优化我国上市公司创新导向型股权激励机制设计,推动国家创新驱动发展战略实施具有重要意义。
|
| [14] |
刘运国, 郑巧, 蔡贵龙. 非国有股东提高了国有企业的内部控制质量吗?:来自国有上市公司的经验证据[J]. 会计研究, 2016(11):61-68+96.
|
| [15] |
冯璐, 张泠然, 段志明. 混合所有制改革下的非国有股东治理与国企创新[J]. 中国软科学, 2021(3):124-140.
|
| [16] |
金宇超, 靳庆鲁, 宣扬. “不作为”或“急于表现”:企业投资中的政治动机[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(10):126-139.
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
逯东, 王运陈, 付鹏. CEO激励提高了内部控制有效性吗?:来自国有上市公司的经验证据[J]. 会计研究, 2014, (6):66-72+97.
|
| [20] |
李萍, 舒伟, 唐清泉, 等. 内部控制能提高企业R&D投资的价值相关性吗?[J]. 中国会计评论, 2015(3):325-346.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
苏坤. 管理层股权激励、风险承担与资本配置效率[J]. 管理科学, 2015, 28(3)14-25.
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
余海宗, 吴艳玲. 合约期内股权激励与内部控制有效性:基于股票期权和限制性股票的视角[J]. 审计研究, 2015(5):57-67.
|
| [25] |
李春瑜. 国有控股企业限薪影响及股权激励调节作用[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(2):101-111.
|
| [26] |
李小荣, 张瑞君. 股权激励影响风险承担:代理成本还是风险规避?[J]. 会计研究, 2014(1):57-63+95.
|
| [27] |
胡楠, 薛付婧, 王昊楠. 管理者短视主义影响企业长期投资吗?:基于文本分析和机器学习[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5)139-156+11+19-21.
|
| [28] |
赵世芳, 江旭, 应千伟, 等. 股权激励能抑制高管的急功近利倾向吗:基于企业创新的视角[J]. 南开管理评论, 2020, 23(6):76-87.
|
| [29] |
蔡贵龙, 郑国坚, 马新啸, 等. 国有企业的政府放权意愿与混合所有制改革[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(9):99-115.
|
| [30] |
毕晓方, 翟淑萍, 姜宝强. 政府补贴、财务冗余对高新技术企业双元创新的影响[J]. 会计研究, 2017(1):46-52+95.
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
权小锋, 尹洪英. 中国式卖空机制与公司创新:基于融资融券分步扩容的自然实验[J]. 管理世界, 2017, (1):128-144+187-188.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |