PDF(1167 KB)
PDF(1167 KB)
PDF(1167 KB)
数字金融、金融摩擦与民营企业技术创新
Digital finance, financial frictions, and technology innovation of private enterprises
金融摩擦导致民营企业技术创新能力不足,成为推进中国式现代化高质量发展突出的金融机制障碍,数字金融的技术优势为有效缓解金融摩擦提供了基础。本文基于修正的BGG模型论证了数字金融发展、金融摩擦和企业技术创新的理论关系,并利用2011—2020年沪深两市A股的民营企业数据,检验数字金融作用于不同类型金融摩擦影响民营企业技术创新投入的作用效果。研究发现(1)数字金融具有减缓金融摩擦促进民营企业技术企业创新投入的作用,其中数字支付和数字信贷的作用尤为显著;(2)机制分析表明,数字金融能够有效降低民营企业技术创新投入中资本错配类和融资成本约束类金融摩擦,但对于融资可得性类金融摩擦不具有缓解作用;(3)数字金融可以靶向校正民营企业技术创新融资中的“领域错配”“阶段错配”和“地区错配”,并对经济不发达地区、规模较小和治理制度完善的民营企业技术创新投入促进作用更强。本文的研究有助于厘清数字金融促进民营企业技术创新的理论机理,为有效化解金融摩擦提升民营企业技术创新能力,提供可靠的经验证据和决策支持。
Financial frictions lead to a lack of technological innovation in private enterprises, which has become a prominent financial mechanism obstacle to advancing Chinese-style modernization and high-quality development. The technological advantage of digital finance provides the basis for an effective solution of the financial frictions. This paper demonstrated the theoretical relationship between the development of digital finance, financial frictions, and enterprise technological innovation based on the revised BGG model, and used the private enterprise data from the A-shares of the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2011 to 2020 to test the effectiveness of digital finance on the impact of different types of financial frictions on the investment of private enterprises in their technological innovations. The study found that (1) digital finance has the effect of mitigating financial frictions to promote innovation investment of private technology enterprises, among which the effects of digital payment and digital credit are more significant; (2) the mechanism analysis showed that digital finance can effectively reduce the financial frictions of capital mismatch and financing cost constraints, but does not have a mitigating effect on the financial frictions related to financing availability; (3) digital finance can target correct the "field mismatch", "stage mismatch" and "regional mismatch" in innovation financing, and has a stronger promoting effect on the investment of private enterprises in their technology innovation in economically underdeveloped areas, small-scale, and well-established governance systems. This paper will help to clarify the theoretical mechanism of digital finance promoting the technological innovation in private enterprises, and provide reliable empirical evidence and decision-making supports for effectively resolving financial frictions and enhancing the technological innovation ability of private enterprises.
digital finance / financial friction / private enterprise / investment in technology innovation
| [1] |
李欣泽, 陈言. 金融摩擦与资源错配研究新进展[J]. 经济学动态, 2018(9):100-114.
|
| [2] |
余明桂, 钟慧洁, 范蕊. 民营化、融资约束与企业创新:来自中国工业企业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2019(4):75-91.
|
| [3] |
唐松, 伍旭川, 祝佳. 数字金融与企业技术创新:结构特征、机制识别与金融监管下的效应差异[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(5):52-66+9.
|
| [4] |
邵挺. 金融错配、所有制结构与资本回报率:来自1999-2007年我国工业企业的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2010(9):51-68.
|
| [5] |
张勋, 万广华, 张佳佳, 等. 数字经济、普惠金融与包容性增长[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(8): 71-86.
|
| [6] |
谢绚丽, 沈艳, 张皓星, 等. 数字金融能促进创业吗?:来自中国的证据[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2018, 17(4):1557-1580.
|
| [7] |
聂秀华, 吴青. 数字金融对中小企业技术创新的驱动效应研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 2021, 35(3):42-53.
|
| [8] |
喻平, 豆俊霞. 数字普惠金融、企业异质性与中小微企业创新[J]. 当代经济管理, 2020, 42(12):79-87.
|
| [9] |
朱东波, 张相伟. 数字金融通过技术创新促进产业结构升级了吗?[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(7): 73-82.
|
| [10] |
易信, 刘凤良. 金融发展、技术创新与产业结构转型:多部门内生增长理论分析框架[J]. 管理世界, 2015(10):24-39+90.
|
| [11] |
李天宇, 张屹山, 张鹤. 我国宏观审慎政策规则确立与传导路径研究:基于内生银行破产机制的BGG-DSGE模型[J]. 管理世界, 2017(10):20-35+187.
|
| [12] |
冉茂盛, 同小歌. 金融错配、政治关联与企业创新产出[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(10):89-97.
|
| [13] |
同小歌, 冉茂盛, 李万利. 金融错配与企业创新:基于政策扭曲与金融摩擦研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(7):69-76.
|
| [14] |
林毅夫, 孙希芳. 信息、非正规金融与中小企业融资[J]. 经济研究, 2005(7):35-44.
|
| [15] |
黄益平, 黄卓. 中国的数字金融发展:现在与未来[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2018, 17(4):1489-1502.
|
| [16] |
刘满凤, 赵珑. 互联网金融视角下小微企业融资约束问题的破解[J]. 管理评论, 2019, 31(3): 39-49.
|
| [17] |
张勋, 万广华, 吴海涛. 缩小数字鸿沟:中国特色数字金融发展[J]. 中国社会科学, 2021(8): 35-51+204-205.
|
| [18] |
战明华, 汤颜菲, 李帅. 数字金融发展、渠道效应差异和货币政策传导效果[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(6):22-38.
|
| [19] |
易行健, 周利. 数字普惠金融发展是否显著影响了居民消费:来自中国家庭的微观证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018, 461(11):47-67.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
江小涓, 黄颖轩. 数字时代的市场秩序、市场监管与平台治理[J]. 经济研究, 2021, 56(12):20-41.
|
| [23] |
郭峰, 王靖一, 王芳, 等. 测度中国数字普惠金融发展:指数编制与空间特征[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2020, 19(4):1401-1418.
|
| [24] |
喻崇武. 非金融企业部门的经济增长与杠杆率:基于金融摩擦的视角[J]. 宏观经济研究, 2022(2): 5-15.
|
| [25] |
温忠麟, 方杰, 谢晋艳, 等. 国内中介效应的方法学研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2022, 30(8):1692-1702.
中介效应可以分析自变量对因变量的影响过程和作用机制, 已成为分析多个变量之间关系的一种重要统计方法。最近20年, 中介效应成了研究方法的一个热点。从中介效应的检验方法、效应量、类别变量的中介效应检验、纵向数据的中介效应检验和模型拓展(包括多重中介、多层中介、有调节的中介和有中介的调节模型)五个方面系统总结了国内中介效应的方法学研究的发展历程。最后对中介效应的国外方法学研究进展和中介效应的未来研究方向做了讨论和拓展。
<p id="p00005">Being able to analyze the influence mechanism of independent variables on dependent variables, the analysis of mediation effect has become an important statistical method in multivariate research. Since the first publication of Chinese paper on the mediation effect and its analytical methods in 2004, the mediation effect has become one focus of methodological research in Chinese Mainland, which is systematically reviewed in this paper.</p> <p id="p00010">Firstly, the simple mediation model is reviewed with concept identification: how to distinguish between mediation and suppression effects, partial and complete mediation effects, and mediation effect and moderation effect. Then, methodological research on mediation effects in China’s Mainland is divided into five aspects: testing method for mediation effects, mediation effect size measure, mediation effect involving categorical variables or longitudinal data, and extended mediation model. They are summarized as follows.</p> <p id="p00015">To test <i>ab</i>≠0,the easiest way is to test <i>a</i>≠0 and <i>b</i>≠0. These sequential tests are actually not the same as the joint significance tests because the Type-I error rates are rather different. If the test result is <i>a</i>≠0 and <i>b</i>≠0, then <i>ab</i>≠0 can be inferred with the Type-I error rate less than the significance level 0.05 (the preset significance level), while the Type-I error rate of the joint significance tests is 0.0975. However, if at least one of <i>a</i>≠0 and<i> b</i>≠0 does not hold, the sequential tests should not be used, since its statistical power is less than other alternative test methods discussed in the paper. Anyway, Bootstrap methods are preferred because they provide interval estimation of the mediation effect with a higher power. Furthermore, if appropriate prior information is available, the Bayesian method is also recommended.</p> <p id="p00020">It is believed that <i>κ</i><sup>2</sup>, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>-type and so on are not suitable as mediation effect size measures because of no monotonicity. Although <inline-formula>$\upsilon ={{(ab)}^{2}}$</inline-formula> is monotonic, it is not as simple and clear as the mediation effect (<i>ab</i>) itself. It is recommended that when the signs of <i>ab</i> and <i>c</i> are consistent, the standardized estimation of <i>ab</i> and <i>ab/c</i> should be reported.</p> <p id="p00025">Mediation analysis with multi-categorical independent variables and with a two-condition within-participant design are discussed when categorical variables are concerned in mediation effect models.</p> <p id="p00030">There are two types of model development in mediation analysis with longitudinal data. One is continuous time model and multilevel time-varying coefficient model that could be used to test time-varying effect of mediation effect. The other is random-effects cross-lagged panel model and multilevel autoregressive mediation model that could be adopted to examine individuals-varying effect of mediation effect. In addition, latent growth mediation model or multilevel mediation model in mediation effect analysis could be adopted only when the involved causal relationship is instant. Otherwise, cross-lagged panel model, continuous time model, or multilevel autoregressive mediation model should be adopted.</p> <p id="p00035">The extensions of the mediation model include multiple mediation model, multilevel mediation model, single-level and multilevel moderated mediation model as well as mediated moderation model. These extended models can be used for both the analysis of observed variables and latent variables.</p> <p id="p00040">Finally, the recent development of foreign methodological research on mediation effects is discussed, including potential outcome mediation analysis, confounder control in mediation analysis, robust mediation analysis, and power analysis of mediation effects. Moreover, integration of new statistical techniques has become a new feature of methodological research of mediation effects, for example, exploratory mediation analysis via regularization, bi-factor mediation analysis, latent class mediation analysis, and network mediation analysis.</p>
|
| [26] |
傅秋子, 黄益平. 数字金融对农村金融需求的异质性影响:来自中国家庭金融调查与北京大学数字普惠金融指数的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2018(11):68-84.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |