PDF(1244 KB)
PDF(1244 KB)
PDF(1244 KB)
专精特新“小巨人”认定对企业创新的影响研究
Research on the impacts of recognition policy of SRDI "Little Giants" on the innovation of enterprises
专精特新“小巨人”企业是国家创新驱动发展战略的重要力量,但专精特新“小巨人”企业认定政策对企业创新效应的微观研究尚不够深入。本文以2015—2021年中小板上市公司为研究对象,从创新质量和创新效率角度考察认定政策对企业创新的影响及作用机制。研究发现:专精特新“小巨人”企业认定政策能够显著提升企业的创新质量和创新效率,且对创新质量的提升大于创新效率,表明认定政策主要是帮助企业“提质”。进一步研究发现,认定政策主要通过缓解融资约束、优化人力资本结构以及促进数字化转型三条途径提高企业的创新质量与效率。同时,认定政策的影响效果在第二批入选企业、适用财政补贴支持手段的企业以及处于成熟期和衰退期需要重新焕发生命活力的企业中表现更为显著。本文为专精特新“小巨人”企业认定政策的有效性提供了有力证据,对助力专精特新“小巨人”企业更好发展具有一定参考意义。
Specialized,refined,distinctive and innovative "Little Giant" enterprises (SRDI "Little Giants") are an important force in the national innovation-driven development strategy,but the existing micro-research on the innovation effect of the recognition policy of SRDI "Little Giants" is not deep enough. For this reason,this paper selected the SMEs listed in 2015-2021 and the national SRDI "Little Giants" recognized during this period as the research samples,and adopted the DID method to examine the impact of the recognition policy on the innovation quality and innovation efficiency of enterprises and the influence mechanism. It was found that the policy of recognizing SRDI "Little Giants" can significantly improve the innovation quality and innovation efficiency of enterprises,and this conclusion still holds after a series of robustness tests. It was further found that the recognition policy improves firms' innovation quality and efficiency mainly through alleviating financing constraints,improving human capital acquisition and facilitating digital transformation. At the same time,the effect of the recognition policy on innovation quality and efficiency of SRDI "Little Giants" is more significant in the second batch of selected enterprises,those applying the financial subsidy support means,and those in the maturity and decline periods. This paper has provided intuitive and powerful evidence for the effectiveness of the policy of recognizing SRDI "Little Giants",which will have important theoretical and practical value for better assisting the cultivation of SRDI "Little Giants".
专精特新“小巨人”企业 / 创新质量 / 创新效率 / 数字化转型
specialized,refined,distinctive and innovative "Little Giant" enterprise / innovation quality / innovation efficiency / digital transformation
| [1] |
张米尔, 任腾飞, 黄思婷. 专精特新“小巨人”遴选培育政策的专利效应研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2023, 37(5): 33-43+53.
|
| [2] |
汪合黔, 陈开洋. 创新支持政策对企业研发投入和经营绩效的影响:来自专精特新“小巨人”企业的微观证据[J]. 南方金融, 2022, 43(11): 22-35.
|
| [3] |
丁永健, 吴小萌. “小巨人”企业培育有助于提升制造业中小企业创新活力吗:来自“专精特新”政策的证据[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(12): 108-116.
“小巨人”企业培育是国家为提升产业链供应链稳定安全提出的新政策,与原有科技创新政策相比,更注重提升产业链关键节点企业的创新活力,从而实现技术补链效果。为评估该政策的有效性,基于2014—2020年制造业中小企业面板数据,使用DEA—Malmquist指数测算制造业中小企业创新活力,并运用Tobit模型检验“小巨人”企业培育对制造业中小企业创新活力的影响。研究发现:①“小巨人”企业培育能够显著促进制造业中小企业创新活力提升,这种促进作用主要通过技术效率水平提升实现,而非技术进步率本身,这体现了政策设计的初衷;②政策对劳动密集型、技术密集型中小企业创新活力的提升作用大于资本密集型。研究结论可为完善“小巨人”企业培育政策提供理论支撑和实践指导。
|
| [4] |
湛泳, 马从文. 专精特新“小巨人”企业培育对突破式创新的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2024, 15(4): 560-567.
|
| [5] |
付馨苇, 谢家智. 专精特新“小巨人”认定与双元创新正向跃迁[J]. 华东经济管理, 2025, 39(2):24-36.
|
| [6] |
狄盈馨, 李启佳, 罗福凯. “专精特新”战略对企业数字化转型的影响:技术创新能力的中介效应[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2024, 36(5): 104-117.
|
| [7] |
姜启波, 谭清美. 政府创新补贴与企业创新及其组态路径:基于质量和效率视角[J]. 软科学, 2020, 37(4): 37-43.
|
| [8] |
刘倩, 栗华临. 创新政策、 高管技术背景与专精特新“小巨人”企业创新绩效研究[J]. 科技和产业, 2024, 24(3): 98-105.
|
| [9] |
曹虹剑, 张帅, 欧阳峣, 等. 创新政策与“专精特新”中小企业创新质量[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022, 39(11): 135-154.
|
| [10] |
韩洪灵, 彭瑶, 刘强. 技术进步与就业增长并存?:基于专精特新“小巨人”企业认定政策的研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(10): 2055-2066+2129.
技术创新与就业稳定对于我国经济高质量发展具有重要意义,但技术进步不可避免地会引起对潜在就业问题的担忧。本文以专精特新“小巨人”企业认定政策为切入点,对2015-2022年沪深A股上市公司开展准自然实验,利用双重差分法考察该政策影响企业劳动雇佣的效应与机理。研究发现:(1)“小巨人”企业认定显著增加了企业劳动雇佣规模,且结果稳健;(2)该效应在民营企业、“小巨人”企业密度更高的关键行业、竞争更激烈的行业、区域创新水平低的地区更显著;(3)“小巨人”企业认定通过提高税收优惠程度、增加银行贷款、降低融资约束促进了企业劳动雇佣规模的提升;(4)“小巨人”企业认定通过增加企业劳动雇佣促进了企业人力资本结构优化升级与高质量发展。本文的研究结果表明,专精特新“小巨人”的认定与培育,是推动企业创新与技术进步、实现就业增长的有效举措,对优化中小企业培育政策、实现稳就业保民生具有启示意义。
Technological innovation and employment stability are of great significance to the high-quality development of China's economy, but technological progress inevitably raises concerns about potential employment problems.Using a quasi-natural experiment produced by the SRDI ‘little giants’ enterprises identification policy, this paper takes China's A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2022 as samples, and explores the effects and mechanisms between the policy and enterprise labor employment by difference-in-difference approach. The paper finds that the identification of SRDI ‘little giants’ enterprises significantly promotes the increase of labor employment, especially in private enterprises and in private enterprises, key industries with higher density of ‘little giants’ enterprises, more competitive industries, and areas with low regional innovation level. Further tests show that tax incentives, bank loans and financial constraint are the main mechanisms.Finally,the increase of labor employment also significantly promotes enterprise human capital structure upgrading and boosts enterprise high-quality development. The results of this paper show that the identification and cultivation of SRDI ‘little giants’ enterprises is an effective policy to promote technological progress and achieve employment growth, which is instructive for optimizing the cultivation policy of small and medium-sized enterprises, stabilizing employment and safeguarding people's wellbeing.
|
| [11] |
孙成, 李瑷蔚, 吴金希. “帽子效应”与产业链韧性[J]. 中国软科学, 2024, 37(9): 44-55.
|
| [12] |
张仁杰. 增值税留抵退税影响企业数字化转型的路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(4): 138-146.
|
| [13] |
张治栋, 韦昊松. 创新人才集聚、产业结构优化与经济高质量发展:基于长三角地区41个城市的实证研究[J]. 南京财经大学学报, 2023, 41(3): 1-11.
|
| [14] |
袁淳, 肖土盛, 耿春晓, 等. 数字化转型与企业分工:专业化还是纵向一体化[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021, 41(9): 137-155.
|
| [15] |
文传浩, 曾艳梅, 李益, 等. 供应链金融与专精特新“小巨人”企业高质量发展:基于“资金+技术”双轮驱动视角的讨论[J]. 华东经济管理, 2024, 38(10): 72-82.
|
| [16] |
马永强, 赵良凯, 杨华悦, 等. 空气污染与企业绿色创新:基于我国重污染行业A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 产业经济研究, 2021, 22(6): 116-128.
|
| [17] |
张伟. 政府补助与专精特新“小巨人”企业创新:制度环境的视角[J]. 重庆科技大学学报(社会科学版)2024, 25(4): 28-43.
|
| [18] |
鞠晓生, 卢荻, 虞义华. 融资约束、 营运资本管理与企业创新可持续性[J]. 经济研究, 2013, 48 (1): 4-16.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
张志新, 徐世超, 高惠楠. 大数据发展能否推动企业绿色技术创新“质效并举”:基于“国家大数据综合试验区”的准自然实验[J]. 当代经济研究, 2024, 30(4):103-115.
|
| [21] |
罗知, 齐博成. 环境规制的产业转移升级效应与银行协同发展效应:来自长江流域水污染治理的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2021, 29(2): 174-189.
|
| [22] |
刘伟, 卢泓方, 于龙振, 等. 智能化转型、经济政策不确定性与制造业创新:基于创新动机视角[J]. 广东财经大学学报, 2024, 38(3): 4-19.
|
| [23] |
赵琦, 钟夏洋. 金融制度改革与中小企业数字化转型:来自新三板分层制度的证据[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 40(10): 131-149.
|
| [24] |
万海远, 张尉, 陈基平, 等. 税收政策支持与企业预期转变[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 29(4): 24-42.
|
| [25] |
梁永福, 许伟涛, 李家演. 投融资期限错配如何影响企业创新:基于企业生命周期的视角[J]. 投资研究, 2024, 42(8): 21-43.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |