PDF(1596 KB)
PDF(1596 KB)
PDF(1596 KB)
从要素认知到框架建构:新质生产力视角下数据生产要素研究述评
From factor cognition to framework construction: A review of the research on data production factors from the perspective of new quality productive force
在数字经济迅猛发展的当下,数据生产要素已成为新质生产力的核心驱动,但现有研究对这一新型生产要素与新质生产力之间的关联机制缺乏系统性整合。本文以“内涵演进—特性辨析—机制概述—框架整合”为逻辑梳理了相关研究文献,结果显示:(1)数据要素在信息资源承载、价值形态变化与要素融合方面的内涵演进,与新质生产力的本质要求高度契合;(2)数据要素的特性重塑了生产力增长逻辑,为新质生产力提升提供了新的范式;(3)数据要素在不同经济层面的作用呈现多重性:微观层面表现为生产效率提升与“数字化悖论”并存,中观层面驱动产业重构的同时加剧市场失衡,宏观层面在促进经济增长的同时引发非均衡性挑战。本文从“要素—技术—组织—模式”四个维度提出整合框架,揭示了数据要素从“要素赋能”到“系统涌现”的驱动路径,实现了从要素解构到框架整合的理论建构,并提出了未来研究方向,以期为该领域的理论创新与政策制定提供参考。
In the rapid development of digital economy, data has become the pivotal driver of new quality productive forces (NQPF). However, the existing research lacks systematic integration of the correlation mechanism between data and NQPF. This paper reviewed relevant literature following the logic of "Connotation Evolution—Characteristics Analysis—Mechanism Overview—Framework Integration". The results showed that: (1) The evolution of data's connotation in terms of information resource carrying, value form transformation and factor integration is highly consistent with NQPF's essential requirements; (2) The inherent characteristics of data have reshaped the productivity growth logic, providing a new paradigm for enhancing NQPF; (3) Data's role exhibits multifaceted effects across economic dimensions: at the micro-level, it is the coexistence of productivity enhancement and the "digital paradox"; at the meso-level, it drives industrial restructuring while exacerbating market imbalances; and at the macro level, it raises the challenge of imbalance while promoting economic growth; and (4) Synthesizing existing findings, this study innovatively proposed an integrated framework of "factor—technology—organization—pattern", thus revealing data's transition from "factor empowerment" to "systemic emergence" in driving productivity. Through this review, we have advanced theoretical construction from factor deconstruction to framework integration and will outline future research directions to inform theoretical innovation and policy formulation in this field.
data element / production factor / new quality productive force / literature review
| [1] |
周绍东, 李靖. 数字化新质生产力发展的政治经济学研究[J]. 马克思主义理论学科研究, 2024, 10(4): 37-50.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
任保平, 李婧瑜. 数据成为新生产要素的政治经济学阐释[J]. 当代经济研究, 2023(11): 5-17.
|
| [4] |
李弦. 数据要素赋能新质生产力的理论逻辑与实践进路:基于马克思劳动过程理论的分析[J]. 上海经济研究, 2024(5): 25-36.
|
| [5] |
冯永琦, 林凰锋. 数据要素赋能新质生产力:理论逻辑与实践路径[J]. 经济学家, 2024(5): 15-24.
|
| [6] |
王京, 陈晶, 李舒妍. 创新生态系统视角下数字技术对区域创新绩效的影响效应研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(5): 94-104.
|
| [7] |
孙雪娇, 范润. 数字经济对大中小企业全要素生产率影响的鸿沟效应[J]. 经济管理, 2023, 45(8): 45-64.
|
| [8] |
王静田, 付晓东. 数字经济的独特机制、理论挑战与发展启示:基于生产要素秩序演进和生产力进步的探讨[J]. 西部论坛, 2020, 30(6): 1-12.
|
| [9] |
蔡继明, 刘媛, 高宏, 等. 数据要素参与价值创造的途径:基于广义价值论的一般均衡分析[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(7): 108-121.
|
| [10] |
潘家栋, 肖文. 新型生产要素:数据的生成条件及运行机制研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2022, 52(7): 5-15.
|
| [11] |
李海舰, 赵丽. 数据成为生产要素:特征、机制与价值形态演进[J]. 上海经济研究, 2021(8): 48-59.
|
| [12] |
杨青峰, 李晓华. 数字经济的技术经济范式结构、制约因素及发展策略[J]. 湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 48(1): 126-136.
|
| [13] |
徐翔, 孙宝文, 李涛. 基于“技术—经济”分析框架的数字经济生产函数研究[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2022(5): 38-48.
|
| [14] |
徐翔, 赵墨非, 李涛, 等. 数据要素与企业创新:基于研发竞争的视角[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(2): 39-56.
|
| [15] |
徐翔, 赵墨非. 数据资本与经济增长路径[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(10): 38-54.
|
| [16] |
徐翔, 厉克奥博, 田晓轩. 数据生产要素研究进展[J]. 经济学动态, 2021(4): 142-158.
|
| [17] |
田秀娟, 李睿. 数字技术赋能实体经济转型发展:基于熊彼特内生增长理论的分析框架[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(5): 56-73.
|
| [18] |
杨俊, 李小明, 黄守军. 大数据、技术进步与经济增长:大数据作为生产要素的一个内生增长理论[J]. 经济研究, 2022, 57(4): 103-119.
|
| [19] |
戚聿东, 刘欢欢. 数字经济下数据的生产要素属性及其市场化配置机制研究[J]. 经济纵横, 2020(11): 63-76+2.
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
肖静华. 企业跨体系数字化转型与管理适应性变革[J]. 改革, 2020 (4): 37-49.
|
| [25] |
郭王玥蕊. 企业数字资产的形成与构建逻辑研究:基于马克思主义政治经济学的视角[J]. 经济学家, 2021(8): 5-12.
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
刘涛雄, 戎珂, 张亚迪. 数据资本估算及对中国经济增长的贡献:基于数据价值链的视角[J]. 中国社会科学, 2023(10): 44-64+205.
|
| [28] |
尹西明, 林镇阳, 陈劲, 等. 数据要素价值化动态过程机制研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(2): 220-229.
数据作为全新的生产要素,已成为数字经济时代的“石油”,数据要素驱动的创新创业正成为新发展阶段实现高质量发展的新引擎。但鲜有针对数据要素价值化过程及其价值创造机制的研究。本研究针对新发展格局下数据要素价值化的难题,结合数据要素的“5I”社会属性,建构“要素-机制-绩效”这一过程视角下数据要素价值化的动态整合理论模型,系统论述通过数据银行实现数据要素多维价值创造的五阶段动态过程机制,也即低成本汇聚、规范化确权、高效率治理、资产化交易和全场景应用,讨论了落实这一机制的现实挑战和政策建议。本研究为打开数据要素价值化过程“黑箱”,加速数据要素价值化、赋能数字产业化和产业数字化,进而实现数字创新引领新发展阶段的高质量可持续发展提供理论与实践启示。
Big data as a new factor of production has become the "oil" in the era of digitalization. Innovation and entrepreneurship driven by data elements is becoming a new engine to achieve high-quality development in the new era. Yet there are relatively few researches on the value realization process and value creation process of data elements. This study aims at the problem of valuing data elements under the new development pattern and the mechanism of realizing the value of big data. It first discusses the "5I"(Integration, Interconnection, Insight, Improvement, Iteration) social attribute of data elements, followed by proposing a "factor-mechanism-performance" dynamic holistic model with a core part of data bank. Data bank is based on the full storage, comprehensive aggregation, standard right confirmation and efficient governance of massive data. Based on the social attributes of data elements, the mode and concept of banks, it makes data as a new kind of economic resource and further a tradeable asset, and finally realizes the transaction and application value-added of data. Data bank is a new business form and value-added service under the market-oriented allocation of data elements in the era of data economy. Then it systematically discusses the five-stage dynamic process mechanism of multi-dimensional value creation of data elements through data bank, that is, low cost convergence, standardized right confirmation, highly efficient governance, asset trading and full scenario application. Furthermore, it discusses the challenges, pointing out that the core technology is not yet mature and the value efficiency is low, the orientation of organization is unclear and the system and law need to be perfected. Finally, it proposes future research topics related big data value creation and policy suggestions for the implementation of this dynamic holistic mechanism, with a call for constructing a value creating ecosystem of data elements with Chinese characteristics so as to enable China’s new development pattern and sustainable development. This study provides theoretical and practical enlightenment for opening the "black box" of data elements value creation process, accelerating the value creation of data elements, enabling digital industrialization and industry digitalization, and then realizing high-quality sustainable development led by digital innovation in the new development stage.
|
| [29] |
白永秀, 李嘉雯, 王泽润. 数据要素:特征、作用机理与高质量发展[J]. 电子政务, 2022 (6): 23-36.
|
| [30] |
王雪, 夏义堃, 裴雷. 国内外数据要素市场研究进展:系统性文献综述[J]. 图书情报知识, 2023, 40(6): 117-128.
|
| [31] |
谢康, 夏正豪, 肖静华. 大数据成为现实生产要素的企业实现机制:产品创新视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020(5): 42-60.
|
| [32] |
何玉长, 王伟. 数据要素市场化的理论阐释[J]. 当代经济研究, 2021(4): 33-44.
|
| [33] |
李勇坚. 数据要素的经济学含义及相关政策建议[J]. 江西社会科学, 2022, 42(3): 50-63.
|
| [34] |
齐兰, 何则懿. 数字资本研究进展[J]. 经济学动态, 2023(10): 128-143.
|
| [35] |
王谦, 付晓东. 数据要素赋能经济增长机制探究[J]. 上海经济研究, 2021(4): 55-66.
|
| [36] |
蔡跃洲, 马文君. 数据要素对高质量发展影响与数据流动制约[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2021, 38(3): 64-83.
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
We build an endogenous growth model with consumer-generated data as a new key factor for knowledge accumulation. Consumers balance between providing data for profit and potential privacy infringement. Intermediate good producers use data to innovate and contribute to the final good production, which fuels economic growth. Data are dynamically nonrival with flexible ownership while their production is endogenous and policy-dependent. Although a decentralized economy can grow at the same rate (but are at different levels) as the social optimum on the Balanced Growth Path, the R&D sector underemploys labor and overuses data—an inefficiency mitigated by subsidizing innovators instead of direct data regulation. As a data economy emerges and matures, consumers’ data provision endogenously declines after a transitional acceleration, allaying long-run privacy concerns but portending initial growth traps that call for interventions.
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
荆文君, 孙宝文. 数字经济促进经济高质量发展:一个理论分析框架[J]. 经济学家, 2019 (2): 66-73.
|
| [43] |
陈剑, 黄朔, 刘运辉. 从赋能到使能:数字化环境下的企业运营管理[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(02): 117-128+222.
|
| [44] |
马路萌, 余东华. 一个包含数据要素的经济增长模型:生产率效应与数据要素化[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(4): 12-22.
数字经济时代,数据成为独立生产要素,是科技创新的新引擎和经济高质量发展的新动能。从纯数字资产与数据匹配性投入共同组成数据要素化投入的角度理解数据生产要素化,使用数据匹配性投入综合得分对中国数据要素化投入进行时空分析和生产率效应分析。结果表明,中国数据要素化投入存在明显的区域差异,基于数据要素化投入对经济产出的积极作用,其对区域经济协调发展具有重要作用;数据匹配性投入价格持续下降会影响生产要素间的交互作用,数据生产要素的使用带来生产方式的根本变革;数据生产要素化基于数据间的互联互通和经济融合,能够加快数据确权,促进生产要素合理配置,从而推动产业创新和经济高质量发展。
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
The rapid development of the digital economy has highlighted the crucial role of data in economic growth. This study investigates the impact of two types of innovation on long-term growth by incorporating data into a model of creative destruction and knowledge accumulation. Unlike traditional factors, data exhibit nonrivalry between the two research and development (R&D) sectors, thereby influencing the growth rate of economic outputs simultaneously without interference. Our findings reveal the existence of a balanced growth path (BGP) in both the decentralized economy and the social planner’s economy. In horizontal innovation, data can be transformed into digital knowledge to promote the economic growth [Cong et al. (2021)]. In addition to horizontal innovation, the utilization of data in vertical innovation also enhances the success rate of innovation, with a gradual decrease in per capita data usage on the BGP. Moreover, as agents accumulate human capital, the economy achieves higher output levels, effectively addressing consumer privacy concerns. However, along the transitional path, insufficient data provision by both R&D sectors leads to lower economic growth rates or more intense economic fluctuations, necessitating policy interventions.
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
严子淳, 李欣, 王伟楠. 数字化转型研究:演化和未来展望[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(4): 21-34.
|
| [50] |
陈国青, 曾大军, 卫强, 等. 大数据环境下的决策范式转变与使能创新[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(2): 95-105+220.
|
| [51] |
史亚雅, 杨德明. 数字经济时代商业模式创新与盈余管理[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(4): 170-179.
|
| [52] |
李盼盼, 乔晗, 郭韬. 数字化水平对制造企业商业模式创新的跨层次作用研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(11): 11-20.
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
We examine the impact of “big data” on firm performance in the context of forecast accuracy using proprietary retail sales data obtained from Amazon. We measure the accuracy of forecasts in two relevant dimensions: the number of products (N), and the number of time periods for which a product is available for sale (T). Theory suggests diminishing returns to larger N and T, with relative forecast errors diminishing at rate 1/sqrt(N)+1/sqrt(T). Empirical results indicate gains in forecast improvement in the T dimension but essentially flat N effects.
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
刘淑春, 闫津臣, 张思雪, 等. 企业管理数字化变革能提升投入产出效率吗[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5): 170-190+13.
|
| [58] |
任志成, 赵梓衡. 数字化转型对制造业全要素生产率提升的影响:来自上市公司的微观证据[J]. 工业技术经济, 2022, 41(11): 23-30.
|
| [59] |
王京滨, 刘赵宁, 刘新民. 数字化转型与企业全要素生产率:基于资源配置效率的机制检验[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2024, 41(3): 23-33.
制造企业数字化转型既是实现制造业数字化、网络化、智能化的关键路径,也是促进我国经济高质量发展的必然选择。以2011—2020年中国 A 股制造业上市公司为研究样本,实证考察企业数字化转型对其全要素生产率(TFP)的影响及机制。结果表明:数字化转型能够显著提升企业全要素生产率;在作用机制方面,数字化转型可以通过改善资源配置效率促进企业全要素生产率提升。具体而言,数字化转型通过提高企业供应链运作效率与矫正过度投资提升投资效率,进而提升企业全要素生产率;进一步分析发现,在高新技术企业以及东部地区和南方地区,数字化转型对企业全要素生产率的提升作用更加显著。结论可为理解企业数字化转型的经济效应提供新的经验证据,从而为夯实经济高质量发展必备的微观基础提供重要政策启示。
|
| [60] |
李立威, 成帆, 黄艺涵. “数字化悖论”的内涵、产生机制与跨越路径:文献综述[J]. 科技管理研究, 2023, 43(12): 128-136.
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
Growth has fallen in the U.S. amid a rise in firm concentration. Market share has shifted to low labour share firms, while within-firm labour shares have actually risen. We propose a theory linking these trends in which the driving force is falling overhead costs of spanning multiple products or a rising efficiency advantage of large firms. In response, the most efficient firms (with higher markups) spread into new product lines, thereby increasing concentration and generating a temporary burst of growth. Eventually, due to greater competition from efficient firms, within-firm markups and incentives to innovate fall. Thus our simple model can generate qualitative patterns in line with the observed trends.
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
丁志帆. 信息消费驱动下的传统产业变革:基本内涵与内在机制[J]. 经济学家, 2020 (3): 87-94.
|
| [69] |
李娅, 侯建翔. 数字技术改变了产业的空间集聚吗?:基于280个地级市面板数据的考察[J]. 南京财经大学学报, 2023(2): 21-31.
|
| [70] |
徐伟呈, 周田, 郑雪梅. 数字经济如何赋能产业结构优化升级:基于ICT对三大产业全要素生产率贡献的视角[J]. 中国软科学, 2022(9): 27-38.
|
| [71] |
白雪洁, 宋培, 李琳. 数字经济如何平衡“稳增长调结构”目标:基于地区-行业层面的分析[J]. 南开经济研究, 2022 (7): 3-22.
|
| [72] |
陈晓佳, 徐玮. 数据要素、 交通基础设施与产业结构升级:基于量化空间一般均衡模型分析[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(4): 78-98.
|
| [73] |
谢卫红, 郑迪文, 李忠顺, 等. 数字技术驱动的产业变革:研究综述与展望[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(5): 11-21.
|
| [74] |
Under the guidance of the concept of openness and development, the paper grasps the mechanism of technology spillover in developed countries and analyzes how to better absorb advanced manufacturing technology based on empirical analysis so as to point out the path for the transformation and development of China’s digital manufacturing industry.
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
张昕蔚, 蒋长流. 数据的要素化过程及其与传统产业数字化的融合机制研究[J]. 上海经济研究, 2021(3): 60-69.
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
谢丹阳, 周泽茜. 经济增长理论的变迁与未来:生产函数演变的视角[J]. 经济评论, 2019 (3): 30-39.
|
| [83] |
张平. 数据生产要素性质、知识生产与中国式现代化[J]. 社会科学战线, 2023(10): 44-57.
|
| [84] |
刘文革, 贾卫萍. 数据要素提升经济增长的理论机制与效应分析:基于新古典经济学与新结构经济学的对比分析[J]. 工业技术经济, 2022, 41(10): 13-23.
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
姜松, 孙玉鑫. 数字经济对实体经济影响效应的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(5): 32-39.
|
| [87] |
杨艳, 王理, 廖祖君. 数据要素:倍增效应与人均产出影响:基于数据要素流动环境的视角[J]. 经济问题探索, 2021(12): 118-135.
本文使用 2012 - 2018 年中国 30 个省 (直辖市) 的面板数据, 通过构建 “数据要素流动环境指数” 和绿色全要素生产率, 并以 NPP / VIIRS 夜间灯光数据为工具变量, 从理论和实证两个维度论证了数据要素的倍增效应和数据要素对人均产出的影响。 研究发现, 数据要素对其他要素生产率的提升存在 “倍增效应”, 其表现形式为数据要素通过与其他要素 (主要是劳动力和资本) 的非线性协同作用, 促使全要素生产率实现几何增长; 数据要素对人均产出带来正向的促进作用, 且该作用不因区位的差异而消失; 通过促进全要素生产率实现人均产出增长是数据要素影响人均产出的传导机制。 本文的政策启示是, 各地应该加大重视数据作为生产要素的关键作用和抢抓 “新基建” 机遇, 通过大力推动经济社会数字化转型来加速释放 “数字红利”, 最终实现区位劣势地区的跨越式发展和中国经济的高质量发展。
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |