科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 13-24.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.09.002

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

从要素认知到框架建构:新质生产力视角下数据生产要素研究述评

董丽杰,张永庆,刘新萍   

  1. 上海理工大学管理学院,上海200093
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-05 修回日期:2025-03-20 出版日期:2025-09-20 发布日期:2025-09-09
  • 通讯作者: 张永庆
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重大项目:“面向数字化发展的公共数据开放利用体系与能力建设研究”(21&ZD337,2021.12—2026.12)。

From factor cognition to framework construction: A review of the research on data production factors from the perspective of new quality productive force

Dong Lijie, Zhang Yongqing, Liu Xinping   

  1. School of Management, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
  • Received:2024-07-05 Revised:2025-03-20 Online:2025-09-20 Published:2025-09-09
  • Contact: YONG QINGZHANG

摘要:     在数字经济迅猛发展的当下,数据生产要素已成为新质生产力的核心驱动,但现有研究对这一新型生产要素与新质生产力之间的关联机制缺乏系统性整合。本文以“内涵演进—特性辨析—机制概述—框架整合”为逻辑梳理了相关研究文献,结果显示:(1)数据要素在信息资源承载、价值形态变化与要素融合方面的内涵演进,与新质生产力的本质要求高度契合;(2)数据要素的特性重塑了生产力增长逻辑,为新质生产力提升提供了新的范式;(3)数据要素在不同经济层面的作用呈现多重性:微观层面表现为生产效率提升与“数字化悖论”并存,中观层面驱动产业重构的同时加剧市场失衡,宏观层面在促进经济增长的同时引发非均衡性挑战。本文从“要素—技术—组织—模式”四个维度提出整合框架,揭示了数据要素从“要素赋能”到“系统涌现”的驱动路径,实现了从要素解构到框架整合的理论建构,并提出了未来研究方向,以期为该领域的理论创新与政策制定提供参考。

关键词: 数据要素, 生产要素, 新质生产力, 文献述评

Abstract:     In the rapid development of digital economy, data has become the pivotal driver of new quality productive forces (NQPF). However, the existing research lacks systematic integration of the correlation mechanism between data and NQPF. This paper reviewed relevant literature following the logic of "Connotation Evolution—Characteristics Analysis—Mechanism Overview—Framework Integration". The results showed that: (1) The evolution of data′s connotation in terms of information resource carrying, value form transformation and factor integration is highly consistent with NQPF′s essential requirements; (2) The inherent characteristics of data have reshaped the productivity growth logic, providing a new paradigm for enhancing NQPF; (3) Data′s role exhibits multifaceted effects across economic dimensions: at the microlevel, it is the coexistence of productivity enhancement and the "digital paradox"; at the meso-level, it drives industrial restructuring while exacerbating market imbalances; and at the macro level, it raises the challenge of imbalance while promoting economic growth; and (4) Synthesizing existing findings, this study innovatively proposed an integrated framework of "factor—technology—organization—pattern", thus revealing data′s transition from "factor empowerment" to "systemic emergence" in driving productivity. Through this review, we have advanced theoretical construction from factor deconstruction to framework integration and will outline future research directions to inform theoretical innovation and policy formulation in this field. 

Key words: data element, production factor, new quality productive force, literature review