PDF(1221 KB)
PDF(1221 KB)
PDF(1221 KB)
新质生产力三维生成机制:以深圳新能源汽车产业为例
The generation mechanism of new quality productive forces: A case study of Shenzhen's new energy vehicle industry
创新起主导作用的新质生产力具有独特的生成机制。本文聚焦创新主导所面临的技术路线发散性、产业链创新链复杂性、未来需求及创新收益的高度不确定性,以深圳新能源汽车产业为案例研究对象,从创新实践出发挖掘新质生产力的内在生成机制,基于复杂系统的独特视角构建了“阶段-动力-结构”三维分析框架,对深圳新能源汽车产业孕育-生成-扩散动态过程进行系统梳理和理论考察。研究发现,以自主“产品开发”促使企业掌握新产品概念下的关键核心技术实现“技术自立”进而实现“技术的突破性变革”是推动新质生产力孕育-生成-扩散的现实路径,微观企业由“大规模跟进”向“高效率试错”竞争范式转变以及宏观政府由“选择型”向“市场增进型”政策范式转变是实现产业深度转型升级的协同动力,推动垂直整合与水平分工这两类创新要素配置主导结构的有机耦合有利于动态构建适配于不同技术复杂度与市场需求环境的产业质态结构。研究为因地、因时、因业制宜加快发展新质生产力提供了经验借鉴和理论参考。
New quality productive forces, in which innovation plays a leading role, has a unique internal generation mechanism. This paper focused on the challenges faced by innovation-led development, such as the divergence of technological routes, the complexity of the industrial and innovation chains, and the high uncertainty regarding future demands and innovation returns. Taking the new energy vehicle industry in Shenzhen as the case study object, it delved into the internal generation mechanism of new quality productive forces from the perspective of innovation practices. Based on the unique perspective of complex systems, a three-dimensional analysis framework of "stage-dynamic-structure" was constructed to systematically sort out and theoretically examined the dynamic process of incubation-generation-diffusion of the new energy vehicle industry in Shenzhen. The research findings showed that driving enterprises to achieve "technological self-reliance" through independent "product development" and then realizing "breakthroughs in technological changes" is the practical path to promote the incubation-generation-diffusion of new quality productive forces. The transformation of the competitive paradigm at the micro-enterprise level and the policy paradigm at the macro-government level are the coordinated driving forces for the in-depth transformation and upgrading of the industry. Vertical integration and horizontal division of labor are the two dominant structures for the innovative allocation of factors. This research has provided some empirical and theoretical references for accelerating the development of new quality productive forces in light of local conditions, timings and industries.
new quality productive force / industrial innovation / new energy vehicle
| [1] |
陈梦根, 侯园园. 中国经济增长动力结构变迁:2000—2019[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(1): 53-71.
|
| [2] |
周文, 许凌云. 论新质生产力:内涵特征与重要着力点[J]. 改革, 2023, 10: 1-13.
|
| [3] |
姜辉, 林建华. 当代中国历史方位和发展阶段的科学判断及其演进逻辑[J]. 中国社会科学, 2022(1): 13-35+204.
|
| [4] |
中国社会科学院经济研究所课题组. 结构变迁、效率变革与发展新质生产力[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(4): 4-23.
Research Group of the Institute of Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Structural change, efficiency transformation and the development of new quality productive forces[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2024, 59(4): 4-23.
|
| [5] |
刘海兵, 刘洋, 黄天蔚. 数字技术驱动高端颠覆性创新的过程机理:探索性案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(7): 63-81+99+82.
|
| [6] |
贺俊. 新质生产力问题的理论缺口与经济学的“异质性”分析视角[J]. 财贸经济, 2024, 45(8): 13-21.
|
| [7] |
曾宪聚, 曾凯. 新质生产力:复合概念、发展基础与系统创新路径[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 41(2): 5-15.
|
| [8] |
黄群慧, 盛方富. 新质生产力系统:要素特质、结构承载与功能取向[J]. 改革, 2024(2): 15-24.
|
| [9] |
黄群慧, 贺俊. 赶超后期的产业发展模式与产业政策范式[J]. 社会科学文摘, 2024(1): 72-75.
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
This essay sharpens and refreshes the multi-case theory-building approach, sometimes termed The “Eisenhardt Method.” The Method’s singular aim is theory building, especially with multiple cases and theoretical logic. Its defining features (e.g. research questions without obvious answers, careful case selection, well-identified constructs and relationships, theoretical arguments, boundary conditions) reflect this aim. I begin with the influence of the 1980s, including grounded theorizing and case logic. Relying on exemplars, I illustrate the Method’s defining features. I also address common misconceptions (e.g. types of data, number of cases, performance emphasis). These miss the Method’s essence and imply a rigid template that does not exist. Instead, the Method’s relatively few defining features enable a wide variety of research possibilities. I conclude with what I would write today like a richer palette of research choices, more emphasis on time, and flexible philosophy of science. Yet the core message of theory building would remain.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
成琼文, 赵艺璇. 创新生态系统知识融合的组态路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(7): 41-49.
|
| [16] |
Much has been written about networks, strategic alliances, and virtual organizations. Yet these currently popular frameworks provide little systematic assistance when it comes to out-innovating the competition. That's because most managers still view the problem in the old way: companies go head-to-head in an industry, battling for market share. James Moore sets up a new metaphor for competition drawn from the study of biology and social systems. He suggests that a company be viewed not as a member of a single industry but as a part of a business ecosystem that crosses a variety of industries. In a business ecosystem, companies "co-evolve" around a new innovation, working cooperatively and competitively to support new products and satisfy customer needs. Apple Computer, for example, leads an ecosystem that covers personal computers, consumer electronics, information, and communications. In any larger business environment, several ecosystems may vie for survival and dominance, such as the IBM and Apple ecosystems in personal computers or Wal-Mart and K mart in discount retailing. In fact, it's largely competition among business ecosystems, not individual companies, that's fueling today's industrial transformation. Managers can't afford to ignore the birth of new ecosystems or the competition among those that already exist. Whether that means investing in the right new technology, signing on suppliers to expand a growing business, developing crucial elements of value to maintain leadership, or incorporating new innovations to fend off obsolescence, executives must understand the evolutionary stages all business ecosystems go through and, more important, how to direct those changes.
|
| [17] |
谭劲松, 宋娟, 陈晓红. 产业创新生态系统的形成与演进:“架构者”变迁及其战略行为演变[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(9): 167-191.
|
| [18] |
陈劲, 阳镇, 尹西明. 双循环新发展格局下的中国科技创新战略[J]. 当代经济科学, 2021, 43(1): 1-9.
|
| [19] |
During World War II, the US government’s Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD) supported one of the largest public investments in applied R&D in US history. Using data on all OSRD-funded invention, we show this shock had a formative impact on the US innovation system, catalyzing technology clusters across the country, with accompanying increases in high-tech entrepreneur-ship and employment. These effects persist until at least the 1970s and appear to be driven by agglomerative forces and endogenous growth. In addition to creating technology clusters, wartime R&D permanently changed the trajectory of overall US innovation in the direction of OSRD-funded technologies. (JEL H56, N42, N72, O31, O33, O38, R11)
|
| [20] |
洪永淼, 汪寿阳. 大数据如何改变经济学研究范式?[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(10): 40-55+72+56.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
