科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 1-11.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.02.001

• 论文 •    下一篇

新质生产力评价指标体系构建及测度分析——基于“投入-过程-产出”视角

陈钰芬1，杨双双1，胡思慧2,1   

  1. 1.浙江工商大学统计与数学学院，浙江 杭州310018；
    2.浙江工商大学杭州商学院经济与统计学院，浙江 杭州310000

  • 收稿日期:2024-02-17 修回日期:2024-12-09 出版日期:2025-02-20 发布日期:2025-02-11
  • 通讯作者: 杨双双
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金青年项目：“不同创新模式知识资本的统计核算及经济效应研究”（20CTJ001，2020.09—2025.08）；国家社科基金重大项目：“高质量发展视域下创新要素配置的统计测度与评价研究”（19ZDA122，2019.12—2024.06）；浙江省登峰学科(浙江工商大学统计学)和“统计数据工程技术与应用协同创新中心”资助。

Construction and measurement of the evaluation index system of new quality productive forces: A study based on the perspective of ‘input-process-output’

Chen Yufen1, Yang Shuangshuang1, Hu Sihui2,1   

  1. 1. School of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China; 
    2. School of Economics and Statistics, Hangzhou College of Commerce, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2024-02-17 Revised:2024-12-09 Online:2025-02-20 Published:2025-02-11

摘要：      新质生产力是传统生产力的质态跃升，是大国抢占发展制高点的关键。本文在深刻理解新质生产力科学内涵的基础上，基于新质生产力形成过程，构建包含投入质量、生产活力和产出效能三个维度共40项指标的新质生产力评价指标体系,采用改进的CRITIC方法对全国30个省份2012—2022年的新质生产力水平进行测度，并利用对应分析、核密度估计和Dagum基尼系数等方法展开分析。研究发现：第一，全国及三大区域新质生产力水平持续攀升，但投入产出效率总体偏低；第二，各省份新质生产力发展优劣势各异，人才质量是影响新质生产力的关键；第三，新质生产力总体差异及区域内差异不断扩大，差异主要来源于区域间。本研究有助于客观认识我国新质生产力发展状况，正确识别关键症结，为因地制宜发展新质生产力提供决策参考。

关键词: 新质生产力, 评价指标体系, 投入产出效率, 改进的CRITIC

Abstract:     New quality productive forces are the qualitative leap of traditional productivity forces and the key for major countries to seize the high ground of development. Based on the profound understanding of the scientific connotation of new quality productive forces and the formation process of new quality productive forces, this paper constructed an evaluation index system of new quality productive forces consisting of 40 indicators from such three dimensions as input quality, production vitality, and output efficiency. The improved CRITIC method was used to measure the level of new quality productive forces of 30 provincial-level regions in China from 2012 to 2022, and the correspondence analysis, kernel density estimation and Dagum Gini coefficient method was also used for the analysis. The results showed that: firstly, the level of new quality productive forces in China and three major regions continue to rise, but its overall input-output efficiency are relatively low; secondly, the advantages and disadvantages of the development of new quality productive forces vary among provincial-level regions, and the quality of talent is a key factor affecting new quality productive forces; and thirdly, the overall differences and regional differences of new quality productive forces continue to expand, and the differences mainly come from different regions. This research can objectively reveal the development status of new quality productive forces in China and correctly identify key issues, thus providing decision-making references for developing new quality productive forces according to local conditions.

Key words: new quality productive force, evaluation index system, input-output efficiency, improved CRITIC