战略偏差对企业新质生产力的影响研究

吴东, 李静雯, 吴晓波

科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 11-20.

PDF(1109 KB)
PDF(1109 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 11-20. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.04.002  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2025.04.002

战略偏差对企业新质生产力的影响研究

作者信息 +

A study on the impacts of strategic deviation on firms' new quality productive forces

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

战略性新兴产业是培育新质生产力的核心载体,发展新质生产力的微观机制有待探索。基于组织生态理论,本研究选取2010—2020年中国战略性新兴产业A股上市工业企业作为研究样本,利用面板数据回归探索了战略偏差对企业新质生产力的影响。结果发现:(1)战略偏差显著促进企业新质生产力;(2)产业动荡性越高,战略偏差对企业新质生产力的正向效应被削弱,即在产业动荡性较高的环境中,战略偏差对企业新质生产力的正向效应转变为负向效应;(3)产业时速越高,战略偏差对企业新质生产力的正向效应被加强,即高速发展的产业环境能够凸显战略偏差的积极作用。本文结论在微观层面拓展了对战略偏差的经济后果和企业新质生产力的战略前因的理解,为企业因地制宜发展新质生产力提供了参考。

Abstract

The strategic emerging industries are the core carriers for nurturing new quality productive forces, and the micro-level mechanisms for developing new quality productive forces are yet to be explored. Based on the organizational ecology theory, this study selected China's A-share listed industrial enterprises in strategic emerging industries from 2010 to 2020 as research samples and investigated the impact of strategic deviation on firms' new quality productive forces by using the panel data regression method. The results revealed that: (1) strategic deviation significantly enhances firms' new quality productive forces; (2) the higher the level of industrial turbulence, the weaker the positive effect of strategic deviation on firms' new quality productive forces, and specifically, under highly turbulent industrial environments, the positive effect of strategic deviation on firms' new quality productive forces turns into a negative effect; and (3) the faster the industry clock-speed, the stronger the positive effect of strategic deviation on firms' new quality productive forces, and specifically, rapidly developing industrial environments can amplify the positive role of strategic deviation. This study has expanded the understanding of the economic consequences of strategic deviation and the strategic antecedents of firms' new quality productive forces at the micro-level, and it will provide a reference for firms to develop new quality productive forces in a context-specific manner.

关键词

新质生产力 / 战略偏差 / 组织生态理论 / 战略性新兴产业 / 产业动荡性 / 产业时速

Key words

new quality productive force / strategic deviation / organizational ecology theory / strategic emerging industry / industry turbulence / industry clock-speed

引用本文

导出引用
吴东, 李静雯, 吴晓波. 战略偏差对企业新质生产力的影响研究[J]. 科研管理. 2025, 46(4): 11-20 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.04.002
Wu Dong, Li Jingwen, Wu Xiaobo. A study on the impacts of strategic deviation on firms' new quality productive forces[J]. Science Research Management. 2025, 46(4): 11-20 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.04.002
中图分类号: F273.1   

参考文献

[1]
BAUM J A C, SINGH J V. Organizational niches and the dynamics of organizational mortality[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1994, 100(2): 346-346.
[2]
HANNAN M T, FREEMAN J. Organizational ecology[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
[3]
李卫宁, 李莉. TMT异质性、战略变革与绩效改善的关系研究:基于绩效下滑的非多元化企业的数据实证[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(6): 153-161.
LI Weining, LI Li. TMT heterogeneity, strategic change, and performance improvement: Evidence from non-diversified firms with performance decline[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(6): 153-161.
[4]
DEEPHOUSE D L. Does isomorphism legitimate?[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(4): 1024-1039.
[5]
CASSIMAN B, VEUGELERS R. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(1): 68-82.
Empirical research on complementarity between organizational design decisions has traditionally focused on the question of existence of complementarity. In this paper, we take a broader approach to the issue, combining a “productivity” and an “adoption” approach, while including a search for contextual variables in the firm’s strategy that affects complementarity. Analysis of contextual variables is not only interesting per se, but also improves the productivity test for the existence of complementarity. We use our empirical methodology to analyze complementarity between innovation activities: internal research and development (R&D) and external knowledge acquisition. Our results suggest that internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition are complementary innovation activities, but that the degree of complementarity is sensitive to other elements of the firm’s strategic environment. We identify reliance on basic R&D—the importance of universities and research centers as an information source for the innovation process—as an important contextual variable affecting complementarity between internal and external innovation activities.
[6]
GELETKANYCZ M A, HAMBRICK D C. The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(4): 654-681.
[7]
刘睿智, 胥朝阳. 竞争战略、 企业绩效与持续竞争优势:来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 科研管理, 2008, 29(6): 36-43.
LIU Ruizhi, XU Chaoyang. Competitive strategy, firm performance, and sustainable competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese listed companies[J]. Science Research Management, 2008, 29(6): 36-43.
[8]
CARPENTER M A. The price of change: The role of ceo compensation in strategic variation and deviation from industry strategy norms[J]. Journal of Management, 2000, 26(6):1179-1198.
This research tests the proposition that changes in CEO pay will be reflected in strategic change—viewed as variation in firm strategy and deviation from industry strategic norms. Changes in total CEO pay, long-term pay, and long-term pay structure were found to affect strategic change in a sample of large U.S. firms. However, the effects of pay on change were positive when firm performance was low; the relationships were negative among the highest performing firms.
[9]
SINGH J V, HOUSE R J, TUCKER D J. Organizational-change and organizational mortality[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31(4): 587-611.
[10]
周炜, 海伦贝尔·李, 宗佳妮. 企业战略变革影响组织韧性的效果与边界[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(3): 105-112.
ZHOU Wei, LI Hailunbeier, ZONG Jiani. The effects and boundaries of organizational resilience impacted by strategic change[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(3):105-112.
[11]
HILLER N J, HAMBRICK D C. Conceptualizing executive hubris: The role of (hyper-)core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(4): 297-319.
[12]
SHARFMAN M P, DEAN JR J W. Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: A multidimensional approach[J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17(4): 681-700.
Neither a single set of constructs nor a single set of measures of the organizational environment is widely accepted, making it difficult to build a comprehensive literature on the impact of the environment on thefirm. In this article we review three constructs-complexity, instability, and resource availability common to most environmental research. We identify theoretical omissions in Dess and Beard's (1984) measurement of these constructs, and present a revised set of constructs designed to build on their research. The new measures' construct validity is assessed using perceptual data from senior managers. We investigate the predictive validity of both our measures and Dess and Beard's by using them to predict industry performance. We also use our measures to predict two firm-level structural variables. We argue that the revised measures more accurately reflect our theoretical un-derstanding of environmental dimensions.
[13]
周文, 何雨晴. 新质生产力: 中国式现代化的新动能与新路径[J]. 财经问题研究, 2024(4):3-15.
ZHOU Wen, HE Yuqing. New quality productive forces:New driving force and new path for Chinese modernization[J]. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2024(4):3-15.
[14]
SORENSON O, MCEVILY S, REN C R, et al. Niche width revisited: Organizational scope, behavior and performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(10): 915-936.
[15]
张赤东. 企业创新类型与特征:战略、行业与规模差异:基于国家级创新型企业全样本问卷调查[J]. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(6): 932-937.
摘要
企业创新类型与其战略具有一致性,并因企业所在行业不同、企业经济规模大小而有所差异,是创新政策制订与实施中所需重点考察的。基于国家级创新型企业全样本的调查分析结果再次证明了这一点,同时还发现如下新的创新特征:一是当前创新型企业技术创新以产品创新为主,兼顾工艺创新,特别是在大型创新项目上二者结合紧密;二是虽然企业战略、行业特征与规模差异导致企业创新的多样性,创新型企业多将目标市场定位在全球市场,有53%的企业的创新达到国际市场新的水平;三是中型企业、设备制造行业等创新类型与特征值得在创新政策制订中给予重点关注。
ZHANG Chidong. Types and characteristics of firm innovation: Strategic, industry, and scale differences: Based on a full-sample survey of national innovative enterprises[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2013, 31(6): 932-937.
It’s coherence between innovative type and its strategy in enterprises, and there are some difference of enterprise innovation in different industries and different size, which is an important point to be considered in the process of making innovation policy. This is demonstrated in our questionnaire analysis of the full sample of national innovation-oriented enterprise(IOEs). The questionnaire analysis also discovers following new characteristics of the enterprise innovation. First, product innovation is the main type of innovation of IOEs, meanwhile giving consideration to process innovation, but there is bonded closely between product innovation and process innovation in the big innovative project. Second, most IOEs have located their innovative aims on global market and there is 53% IOEs whose novelty of new product is on the level of international market new, although there is diversity of IOEs innovation that is caused by difference of strategy, industry and size of enterprise. Third, innovative type and characteristics of middle-size IOEs and IOEs in the equipment manufacture industries are worth to be pay more attention to in the process of making innovation policy.
[16]
曹如中, 刘长奎, 曹桂红. 基于组织生态理论的创意产业创新生态系统演化规律研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2011, 28(3): 64-68.
摘要
创意产业创新生态系统演化具有类似于自然生态系统内种群演化的行为特性,二者在结构功能、运行机理、演化发展等方面都存在着众多的相似性。创意产业创新生态系统的模仿机制、竞合机制和知识传导机制类似于自然生态系统内的遗传、变异与选择机制; 创意产业创新生态系统演化也呈现出明显的阶段性特征和生命周期性; 创意产业创新生态系统种群具有自己特定的生态位,种群之间的演化遵循特定的规律。
CAO Ruzhong, LIU Changkui, CAO Guihong. Evolution law of creative industry innovation ecosystems based on organizational ecology theory[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2011, 28(3): 64-68.
[17]
HAN J K, KIM N, SRIVASTAVA R K. Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link?[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1998, 62(4): 30-45.
In recent years, a market-oriented corporate culture increasingly has been considered a key element of superior corporate performance. Although organizational innovativeness is believed to be a potential mediator of this market orientation–corporate performance relationship, much of the evidence to date remains anecdotal or speculative. In this context, the authors present a systematic framework to test the postulated “market orientation–innovation–performance” chain. To this end, the direct causality assumption of market orientation on organizational performance is examined with Narver and Slater's (1990) market orientation framework. Moreover, the authors take a componentwise approach and examine how the three core components of market orientation (customer orientation, competitor orientation, and interfunctional coordination) affect the two core components of organizational innovativeness (technical versus administrative) en route to affecting corporate performance. Using banking industry data, the authors empirically test and substantiate innovation's mediating role in the market orientation–corporate performance relationship.
[18]
LIN C, CHANG C C. The effect of technological diversification on organizational performance: An empirical study of S&P 500 manufacturing firms[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2015, 90: 575-586.
[19]
SORENSEN J B, STUART T E. Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2000, 45(1): 81-112.
This paper investigates the relationship between organizational aging and innovation processes to illuminate the dynamics of high-technology industries, as well to resolve debates in organizational theory about the effects of aging on organizational functioning. We test hypotheses based on two seemingly contradictory consequences of aging for organizational innovation: that aging is associated with increases in firms' rates of innovation and that the difficulties of keeping pace with incessant external developments causes firms' innovative outputs to become obsolete relative to the most current environmental demands. These seemingly contradictory outcomes are intimately related and reflect inherent tradeoffs in organizational learning and innovation processes. Multiple longitudinal analyses of the relationship between firm age and patenting behavior in the semiconductor and biotechnology industries lend support to these arguments.
[20]
FINE C H. Clockspeed: Winning industry control in the age of temporary advantage[M]. New York: Perseus Books, 1998.
[21]
SUBRAMANIAN A M, CHAI K H, MU S. Capability reconfiguration of incumbent firms: Nintendo in the video game industry[J]. Technovation, 2011, 31(5): 228-239.
[22]
李金生, 宋丹丹. 技术范式演进下企业动态创新能力模型研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2016, 33(11):73-79.
LI Jinsheng, SONG Dandan. Dynamic innovation ability model of enterprises based on the evolution of technology paradigm[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2016, 33(11):73-79.
[23]
EISENHARDT K M. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 1989, 32(3): 543-576.
[24]
MARIN A, PETRALIA S, ORTEGA C B. Technological opportunities in natural resources related industries in Latin America. An old discussion, new results[C]. Conference On Micro Evidence On Innovation In Developing Economies, 2012, 6.
[25]
宋佳, 张金昌, 潘艺. ESG发展对企业新质生产力影响的研究:来自中国A股上市企业的经验证据[J]. 当代经济管理, 2024, 46(6): 1-11.
SONG Jia, ZHANG Jinchang, PAN Yi. ESG development and its impact on firms' new quality productive forces: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies[J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 2024, 46(6): 1-11.
[26]
FINKELSTEIN S, HAMBRICK D C. Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(3): 484-503.
[27]
叶康涛, 张姗姗, 张艺馨. 企业战略差异与会计信息的价值相关性[J]. 会计研究, 2014(5): 44-51.
YE Kangtao, ZHANG Shanshan, ZHANG Yixin. Firm strategic differences and the value relevance of accounting information[J]. Accounting Research, 2014(5): 44-51.
[28]
HUSON M R, MALATESTA P H, PARRINO R. Managerial succession and firm performance[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2004, 74(2): 237-275.
[29]
DESS G G, BEARD D W. Dimensions of organizational task environments[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1984, 29: 52-73.
[30]
吴东. 战略谋划、产业变革与对外直接投资进入模式研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2011.
WU Dong. Strategic planning, industry transformation, and entry modes of outward foreign direct investment[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2011.
[31]
HIRSHLEIFER D, LOW A, TEOH S H. Are overconfident CEOs better innovators?[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2012, 67(4): 1457-1498.
[32]
ZHANG Y, RAJAGOPALAN N. Once an outsider, always an outsider? CEO origin, strategic change, and firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(3): 334-346.
[33]
林钟高, 唐洁玉. 企业战略差异、产品市场竞争与风险提示信息[J]. 财贸研究, 2021, 32(11): 97-110.
LIN Zhonggao, TANG Jieyu. Firm strategic differences, product market competition, and risk disclosure information[J]. Finance & Trade Research, 2021, 32(11): 97-110.
[34]
HAISLIP J Z, RICHARDSON V J. The effect of CEO IT expertise on the information environment: Evidence from earnings forecasts and announcements[J]. Journal of Information Systems, 2018, 32(2): 71-94.
Firms depend on information technology to provide high-quality internal information, but prior research suggests that IT is underutilized. Prior research suggests that when CEOs have experience with IT, then IT is more likely to be accepted throughout their firms. We take these arguments a step further by asserting that CEOs with IT expertise are more likely to encourage the utilization of IT throughout the firm, thus improving the information environment that is revealed through numerous outputs of the firm. We first investigate whether firms that employ CEOs with IT expertise make forecasts that are more accurate, even if they already use an enterprise system (Dorantes, Li, Peters, and Richardson 2013). Overall, we find that CEOs with IT expertise do make forecasts that are more accurate. We also find that firms with IT-expertise CEOs announce earnings on a timelier basis than firms with non-IT-expertise CEOs.
[35]
张军, 闫雪凌, 余沭乐, 等. 工业机器人应用与劳动关系:基于司法诉讼的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(12): 90-112.
ZHANG Jun, YAN Xueling, YU Shule, et al. Industrial robot applications and labor relations: Evidence from judicial litigation[J]. Journal of Management World, 2023, 39(12): 90-112.
[36]
姚加权, 张锟澎, 郭李鹏, 等. 人工智能如何提升企业生产效率?: 基于劳动力技能结构调整的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(2): 101-116.
YAO Jiaquan, ZHANG Kunpeng, GUO Lipeng, et al. How does artificial intelligence enhance firm production efficiency? A perspective based on adjustments to the labor skill structure[J]. Journal of Management World, 2024, 40(2): 101-116.
[37]
ACEMOGLU D, RESTREPO P. Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2020, 128(6): 2188-2244.
[38]
何勤, 李雅宁, 程雅馨, 等. 人工智能技术应用对就业的影响及作用机制研究:来自制造业企业的微观证据[J]. 中国软科学, 2020(S1): 213-222.
HE Qin, LI Yaning, CHENG Yaxin, et al. The impact of artificial intelligence technology applications on employment and its mechanism: Evidence from manufacturing firms[J]. China Soft Science, 2020, (S1): 213-222.
[39]
HANNAN M T, FREEMAN J A. The population ecology of organizations[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 82: 929-964.

基金

国家社会科学基金重大项目:“聚焦关键核心技术突破的国家创新体系研究”(21&ZD131,2021.12—2025.12)

PDF(1109 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/