国有企业元件国产化替代的动态最优区分机制

刘佳昕, 李树文, 朱方伟, 杨筱恬

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12) : 79-88.

PDF(1580 KB)
PDF(1580 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12) : 79-88. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.009

国有企业元件国产化替代的动态最优区分机制

作者信息 +

Dynamic optimal differentiation mechanism of localized substitution of components in state-owned enterprises

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

当前国际局势动荡使得全球科技脱钩风险骤增,而元件国产化替代作为应对这一风险的重要手段,逐渐获得理论与实践的共同关注。尽管已有研究从技术突破等视角总结国产化替代经验,但却并未对元件国产化替代过程中合法性和差异化的动态均衡问题进行充分讨论。本研究选取瓦房店轴承集团作为研究对象,运用探索性案例分析方法,遵从“价值触发-价值共创-价值生成”的逻辑,系统探究国有企业元件国产化替代的最优区分过程。研究发现:第一,元件国产化替代是价值触发刺激企业采取以身份主张与价值活动为核心的价值共创,并实现价值生成的过程。第二,随着价值触发从边缘到核心的演变,企业身份主张表现出从原型效仿、典范跟随到打造新典范的进阶逻辑,而价值活动表现出市场响应式、技术交互式到产业协同深化式的进阶逻辑。第三,伴随着身份主张与价值活动的进阶,二者间关系表现出从阈值协奏到补偿协奏、再到整合协奏的动态最优区分规律,并通过形成敏捷式、赋能式到开放式的价值共创,进而实现单点替代、多维替代到价值替代的价值生成。本研究既贡献于价值共创与国产化替代的动态研究,也为国有企业实现国产化替代提供有益借鉴。

Abstract

The current turmoil in the international situation has led to a sudden increase in the risk of global scientific and technological decoupling, and the substitution of components by localization, as an important means of coping with this risk, has gradually garnered attention from both theoretical and practical perspectives. Although some studies have summarized the experience of localized substitution from the perspective of technological breakthroughs, the dynamic equilibrium of legitimacy and differentiation in the process of localized substitution of components has not been fully discussed. In this study, Wafangdian Bearing Group was selected as the research object, and the exploratory case study method was applied to systematically investigate the optimal differentiation process of localized substitution of components in state-owned enterprises by following the logic of "value triggering-value co-creating-value generating". The study found that, firstly, the substitution of nationalized components is a process in which the value trigger stimulates enterprises to adopt value co-creation centered on identity proposition and value activities, and to realize value generation. Second, as the value trigger evolves from the edge to the core, the identity proposition of the enterprise shows a progression logic from prototype emulation and model-following to the creation of a new model, while the value activity shows a market-responsive, technology-interactive, and industry synergistic deepening progression logic. Third, along with the progression of identity propositions and value activities, the relationship between the two exhibits the dynamic optimal differentiation law from threshold concordance to compensatory concordance to integration concordance, and realizes the value generation from single-point substitution, multi-dimensional substitution to value substitution through the formation of agile, empowering, to open-ended value co-creation. This study will contribute to the dynamic study of value co-creation and localization substitution, and it will also provide useful reference for state-owned enterprises to realize localized substitution of components.

关键词

国产化替代 / 最优区分 / 价值共创 / 国有企业 / 工业元件

Key words

localized substitution / optimal differentiation / value co-creation / state-owned enterprise / industrial component

引用本文

导出引用
刘佳昕, 李树文, 朱方伟, . 国有企业元件国产化替代的动态最优区分机制[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(12): 79-88 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.009
Liu Jiaxin, Li Shuwen, Zhu Fangwei, et al. Dynamic optimal differentiation mechanism of localized substitution of components in state-owned enterprises[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(12): 79-88 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.009
中图分类号: F273.1   

参考文献

[1]
胡晓, 杨德林, 马倩. 政府与市场共演化驱动下中国集成电路产业国产替代路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(11):9-21.
HU Xiao, YANG Delin, MA Qian. Research on the domestic substitution path of China's integrated circuit industry driven by the co-evolution of government and markets[J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(11):9-21.
[2]
王昶, 何琪, 耿红军, 等. 关键战略材料国产替代应用的决定性因素研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(12):93-103.
WANG Chang, HE Qi, GENG Hongjun, et al. Research on the decisive factors of domestic substitution application on key strategic materials[J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(12):93-103.
[3]
张志菲, 罗瑾琏, 李树文, 等. 基于技术范式转变的后发数字企业能力建构与追赶效应研究[J/OL]. 南开管理评论,1-18[2024-04-08]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.F.20230606.1526.002.html.
ZHANG Zhifei, LUO Jinlian, LI Shuwen, et al. Research on digital enterprise's capability cultivation and catch-up effect based on technological paradigm shift[J]. Nankai Business Review, 1-18[2024-04-08]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.F.20230606.1526.002.html.
[4]
李树文, 罗瑾琏, 张志菲. 从定位双星到布局寰宇:专精特新企业如何借助关键核心技术突破实现价值共创[J]. 南开管理评论, 2024, 27(3):94-107.
LI Shuwen, LUO Jinlian, ZAHNG Zhifei. From satellite of the Beidou navigation system to the People's livelihood: How can core technology breakthrough help SRDI enterprises achieve value co-creation?[J]. Naikai Business Review, 2024, 27(3):94-107.
[5]
胡海波, 毛纯兵, 陈劲, 等. 从攻关启动到市场应用: 关键核心技术替代式创新过程机制研究[J/OL]. 南开管理评论,1-20[2024-11-19]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.f.20240925.0918.002.html.
HU Haibo, MAO Chunbing, CHEN Jin, et.al. From research initiation to market application: A study on the mechanism of alternative innovation process of key core technologies[J/OL]. Naikai Business Review, 1-20[2024-11-19]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.f.20240925.0918.002.html.
[6]
BARLOW M A, VERHAAL J C, ANGUS R W. Optimal distinctiveness, strategic categorization, and product market entry on the Google Play app platform[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2019, 40(8): 1219-1242.
[7]
ZHAO E Y, FISHER G, LOUNSBURY M, et al. Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2017, 38(1): 93-113.
[8]
彭新敏, 张祺瑞, 刘电光. 后发企业超越追赶的动态过程机制:基于最优区分理论视角的纵向案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(3): 145-162.
PENG Xinmin, ZHANG Qirui, LIU Dianguang. The dynamic mechanism of latecomer firms in the beyond catch-up stage: A longitudinal case study from the perspective of optimal distinctiveness theory[J]. Journal of Management World, 2022, 38(3): 145-162.
[9]
SU J, GAO X, TAN J. Positioning for optimal distinctiveness: How firms manage competitive and institutional pressures under dynamic and complex environment[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2024, 45(2): 333-361.
[10]
何郁冰, 叶凌峰, 王志玮, 等. 创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新?:生态系统合法性视角的案例研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(10):2216-2227.
摘要
在创新生态系统情境下,生态系统合法性的获取及演化是创业企业成功开展颠覆性创新的有效机制。通过对迈新1993-2023年的纵向案例分析发现,创业企业通过生态系统合法性实现颠覆性创新的过程,实际上是创业企业围绕颠覆性的价值主张构建创新生态系统,并不断克服各种生态系统合法性障碍,逐步得到创新生态系统内外部行动者的理解和认可,最终实现对现有生态系统价值主张的颠覆或部分替代的过程。在此期间,生态系统合法性经历了“规范”、“认知”和“价值”维度的演化,并依次通过“行为”、“话语”和“意义”合法化策略获取相应的合法性。研究结论对于创业企业成功开展颠覆性创新具有重要见解。
HE Yubing, YE Lingfeng, WANG Zhiwei, et al. How start-ups successfully carry out disruptive innovation: A case study based on the perspective of ecosystem legitimacy[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2024, 42(10):2216-2227.
In the context of an innovation ecosystem, the acquisition and its evolution of ecosystem legitimacy is an effective mechanism for start-ups to successfully carry out disruptive innovation. Through the longitudinal case analysis of Maixin from 1993 to 2023, it was found that the process of start-ups achieving disruptive innovation through ecosystem legitimacy is actually that start-ups build an innovation ecosystem around a disruptive value proposition, and constantly overcome various obstacles to ecosystem legitimacy during this period, so as to gradually get the understanding and recognition of internal and external actors of the ecosystem, and finally disrupting or partially replacing the existing ecosystem value proposition. In the formation process of disruptive innovation, the ecosystem legitimacy of start-ups has experienced the dynamic evolution of “norm legitimacy”, “cognition legitimacy” and “value legitimacy”. Accordingly, the corresponding legitimacy can be obtained through the ecological legitimation strategies of “discursive legitimation”, “performative legitimation” and “meaning legitimation”. The conclusions of this article provide important insights for start-ups to successfully carry out disruptive innovation.
[11]
郭长伟, 朱亚丽, 于振洋, 等. 大企业内部创业单元如何脱颖而出?:基于最优区分视角的纵向案例研究[J/OL]. 南开管理评论,1-22[2024-04-08]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.F.20231007.1318.002.html.
GUO Changwei, ZHU Liya, YU Zhenyang, et al. How can intrapreneurial units with large enterprises stand out? A longitudinal case study based on optimal distinctiveness perspective[J/OL]. Naikai Business Review,1-22[2024-04-08]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.F.20231007.1318.002.html.
[12]
依绍华, 梁威. 传统商业企业如何创新转型:服务主导逻辑的价值共创平台网络构建[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(1): 171-188.
YI Shaohua, LIANG Wei. How do the traditional commercial enterprises innovate and transform: The construction of the value co-creation platform network from the perspective of service-dominant logic[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2023(1): 171-188.
[13]
李树文, 罗瑾琏, 胡文安. 从价值交易走向价值共创:创新型企业的价值转型过程研究[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(3): 125-145.
LI Shuwen, LUO Jinlian, HU Wenan. From value transaction to value co-creation: Research on the value transformation process of innovative enterprises[J]. Journal of Management World, 2022, 38(3): 125-145.
[14]
李树文, 罗瑾琏, 张志菲. AI能力如何助推企业实现价值共创:基于企业与客户间互动的探索性案例研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(5): 174-192.
LI Shuwen, LUO Jinlian, ZHANG Zhifei. How do AI capabilities promote value co-creation: Exploratory case study based on the interaction between enterprises and customers[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2023(5): 174-192.
[15]
YIN R K. Case study research: Design and methods[M]. London: SAGE, 2009.
[16]
GIOIA D A, CORLEY K G, HAMILTON A L. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2013, 16(1): 15-31.
For all its richness and potential for discovery, qualitative research has been critiqued as too often lacking in scholarly rigor. The authors summarize a systematic approach to new concept development and grounded theory articulation that is designed to bring “qualitative rigor” to the conduct and presentation of inductive research.
[17]
NAVIS C, GLYNN M A. Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2011, 36(3): 479-499.
[18]
陈劲, 曲冠楠, 王璐瑶. 有意义的创新:源起、内涵辨析与启示[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(11): 2054-2063.
摘要
创新活动向人类命运总体意义的回归,是习近平“构建人类命运共同体”理念在经济社会领域引领重大理论与实践转向的具体体现。批判性回顾了关注社会需求的经典创新范式,提出有意义的创新(Meaningful innovation, MI)范式,强调企业应当主动关注创新意义,以之作为创新过程的先决变量,建立创新意义管理与创新要素组合并行的理论框架。回溯了理论源流,划定了理论边界,构建了理论基础,辨析了相关概念,阐述了内涵结构。回顾了改革开放以来,我国管理创新领域主流的创新理论范式的产生、发展与迭代,为有意义的创新之建立与未来发展提供启示。
CHEN Jin, QU Guannan, WANG Luyao. Meaningful innovation: Origin, connotation and enlightenment[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2019, 37(11): 2054-2063.
This paper critically reviews the classical innovation paradigm focusing on social needs, proposes the Meaningful innovation (MI) paradigm, emphasizes that enterprises should actively pay attention to the meaning of innovation, take it as the prerequisite variable of the innovation process, and establishes the theoretical framework of innovation meaning management and innovation elements combination. The paper traces back the origin of theory, delimits the boundary of theory, constructs the theoretical foundation, discriminates and analyzes the related concepts, and expounds the connotative structure. This paper reviews the emergence, development and iteration of the mainstream innovation theory paradigm in the field of management innovation in China since the reform and opening up, and provides enlightenment for the establishment and future development of meaningful innovation.

基金

国家自然科学基金青年项目:“复杂新产品开发项目的供应网络竞合关系治理研究”(72201049)
国家自然科学基金青年项目:“复杂新产品开发项目的供应网络竞合关系治理研究”(2023.01.01—2025.12.31)
教育部人文社会科学基金:“AI技术对数字化服务企业价值共创的使能过程研究:企业与客户间互动视角”(23YJC630091)
教育部人文社会科学基金:“AI技术对数字化服务企业价值共创的使能过程研究:企业与客户间互动视角”(2023.09—2026.08)
“国有企业理论研究开放基金:基于价值共创的国有企业推进国产替代的过程研究”(gqkffjj-zx-202404)
“国有企业理论研究开放基金:基于价值共创的国有企业推进国产替代的过程研究”(2024.09—2025.09)

PDF(1580 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/