海外制裁下中国芯片企业创新网络重构研究

冯永春, 曹鑫锐, 苏萌萌, 严子淳

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12) : 89-99.

PDF(1762 KB)
PDF(1762 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (12) : 89-99. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.010

海外制裁下中国芯片企业创新网络重构研究

作者信息 +

Research on the innovation network reconfiguration of Chinese chip enterprises under overseas sanctions

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

创新网络重构对中国芯片企业应对并抵御海外制裁具有重要价值和作用。本研究选取天津飞腾作为案例分析对象,深入剖析中国芯片企业在海外制裁冲击下重构创新网络的行为机制和底层逻辑。研究发现:(1)在海外制裁冲击下,中国芯片企业重构了创新网络的关系和结构,带来的资源变化进一步推动企业开展资源重构;(2)中国芯片企业重构技术创新网络和市场创新网络分别遵循“安全逻辑”和“竞争逻辑”,即追求关键核心技术安全可控和提高国产芯片的市场竞争力;(3)在不同重构逻辑的指引下,中国芯片企业的技术创新网络和市场创新网络的创新实现方式发生差异化转变,有助于企业从技术和市场两方面更好地应对海外制裁。本研究探明了海外制裁冲击下中国芯片企业创新网络的重构机制,不仅拓展了企业创新网络相关研究,还为海外制裁应对研究提供了新视角,能够为中国企业重构创新网络、抵御海外制裁提供有益参考与借鉴。

Abstract

Innovation network reconfiguration plays a crucial role for Chinese chip enterprises in coping with overseas sanctions. This study chose Tianjin Phytium as the case to deeply analyze the behavior mechanism and underlying logic of Chinese chip enterprises' innovation network reconfiguration under the impact of overseas sanctions. The study found that: (1) Under the impact of overseas sanctions, Chinese chip enterprises reconfigure the relationship and structure of the innovation network, and drive resource reconfiguration; (2) Chinese chip enterprises follow the "security logic" and "competition logic" respectively to reconfigure the technology innovation network and market innovation network, that is, to pursue the security and control of key core technologies and improve the competitiveness of domestic chips; (3) Under the guidance of different reconfiguration logics, the innovation implementation methods of technology innovation network and market innovation network have undergone differentiated transformation, which helps Chinese chip enterprises to better cope with overseas sanctions from the aspects of both technology and market. This study explored the reconfiguration mechanism of Chinese chip enterprises' innovation network under the impact of overseas sanctions, which has not only expanded the research of innovation network, but also provided a new perspective for the study of overseas sanctions response. The research conclusion can provide useful reference for Chinese enterprises to reconfigure innovation network and resist overseas sanctions.

关键词

创新网络 / 重构行为 / 重构逻辑 / 海外制裁 / 芯片企业

Key words

innovation network / reconfiguration behavior / reconfiguration logic / overseas sanction / chip enterprise

引用本文

导出引用
冯永春, 曹鑫锐, 苏萌萌, . 海外制裁下中国芯片企业创新网络重构研究[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(12): 89-99 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.010
Feng Yongchun, Cao Xinrui, Su Mengmeng, et al. Research on the innovation network reconfiguration of Chinese chip enterprises under overseas sanctions[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(12): 89-99 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.010
中图分类号: F273.1;F425   

参考文献

[1]
杨忠, 巫强, 宋孟璐, 等. 美国《芯片与科学法案》对我国半导体产业发展的影响及对策研究:基于创新链理论的视角[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023, 26(1): 146-160.
YANG Zhong, WU Qiang, SONG Menglu, et al. Research on the impact of U.S. "CHIPS and Science Act" on China's semiconductor industry and countermeasures: From the perspective of innovation chain theory[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2023, 26(1): 146-160.
[2]
LUO Y, VAN ASSCHE A. The rise of techno-geopolitical uncertainty: Implications of the United States CHIPS and Science Act[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2023, 54(8): 1423-1440.
[3]
GODSELL D, LEL U, MILLER D. US national security and de-globalization[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2023, 54(8): 1471-1494.
Globalization, defined as trade- and FDI-related interdependence among nations, increases social welfare by transmitting managerial practices, advanced technologies, and labor skills across borders. Recent declines in FDI flows have prompted scholars to speculate on the nature, magnitude, and determinants of de-globalization trends. We investigate whether a U.S. national security-related foreign investment screening law, the Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007 (FINSA), contributes to de-globalization trends. FINSA awarded a regulator known as the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States broad new powers to revise or reject foreign acquisitions of firms in national security-related industries. Using a difference-in-differences research design, a wide variety of model specifications, and estimation samples spanning 1990–2016, we document post-FINSA declines in foreign takeovers of U.S. firms in national security-related industries. Consistent with techno-nationalism, we document that takeover declines are concentrated among research-intensive national security firms. Placebo, event-time, and robustness tests corroborate our results. Our empirical evidence suggests that foreign investment screening laws help explain the nature, magnitude, and determinants of recent de-globalization trends and prompts multinational enterprise managers to increasingly weight the political factors behind foreign investment screening laws when assessing foreign investment strategies.
[4]
WITT M A, LEWIN A Y, LI P P, et al. Decoupling in international business: Evidence, drivers, impact, and implications for IB research[J]. Journal of World Business, 2023, 58(1): 101399.
[5]
VERTINSKY I, KUANG Y, ZHOU D, et al. The political economy and dynamics of bifurcated world governance and the decoupling of value chains: An alternative perspective[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2023, 54(7): 1351-1377.
[6]
PETRICEVIC O, TEECE D J. The structural reshaping of globalization: Implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterprise[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2019, 50(9): 1487-1512.
[7]
LUO Y, WITT M A. Springboard MNEs under de-globalization[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2022, 53(4): 767-780.
[8]
CUI V, VERTINSKY I, WANG Y, et al. Decoupling in international business: The ‘new’ vulnerability of globalization and MNEs' response strategies[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2023, 54(8): 1562-1576.
[9]
鲁若愚, 周阳, 丁奕文, 等. 企业创新网络:溯源、演化与研究展望[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(1): 217-233+14.
LU Ruoyu, ZHOU Yang, DING Yiwen, et al. Enterprise innovation network: Tracing, evolution and research prospect[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37(1): 217-233+14.
[10]
寿柯炎, 魏江. 后发企业如何构建创新网络:基于知识架构的视角[J]. 管理科学学报, 2018, 21(9):23-37.
SHOU Keyan, WEI Jiang. How to build innovation network for latecomers: From the perspective of knowledge configuration[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2018, 21(9): 23-37.
[11]
LEITE E. Innovation networks for social impact: An empirical study on multi-actor collaboration in projects for smart cities[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 139: 325-337.
[12]
李鑫, 魏姗, 李惠娟. 制造业生态创新网络构建及进化逻辑[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(1): 74-83.
LI Xin, WEI Shan, LI Huijuan. Construction and evolutionary logic of the manufacturing eco-innovation network[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(1): 74-83.
[13]
HELFAT C E, KAUL A, KETCHEN JR D J, et al. Renewing the resource-based view: New contexts, new concepts, and new methods[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2023, 44(6): 1357-1390.
[14]
杨震宁, 侯一凡, 李德辉, 等. 中国企业“双循环”中开放式创新网络的平衡效应:基于数字赋能与组织柔性的考察[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(11): 184-205+12.
YANG Zhenning, HOU Yifan, LI Dehui, et al. The balancing effect of open innovation networks in the "Dual Circulation" of Chinese enterprises: An investigation based on digital empowerment and organizational flexibility[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37(11): 184-205+12.
[15]
WANG C, HU Q. Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance[J]. Technovation, 2020, 94: 102010.
[16]
李东红, 陈昱蓉, 周平录. 破解颠覆性技术创新的跨界网络治理路径:基于百度Apollo自动驾驶开放平台的案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(4): 130-159.
LI Donghong, CHEN Yurong, ZHOU Pinglu. Paths of cross-boundary network governance in introducing disruptive technological innovation: The case of Baidu Apollo autonomous driving open platform[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37(4): 130-159.
[17]
WITT M A. De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2019, 50(7): 1053-1077.
[18]
LI J, MEYER K E, ZHANG H, et al. Diplomatic and corporate networks: Bridges to foreign locations[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2018, 49(6): 659-683.
[19]
CHEN Y, ZHANG S, MIAO J. The negative effects of the US-China trade war on innovation: Evidence from the Chinese ICT industry[J]. Technovation, 2023, 123: 102734.
[20]
郑刚, 邓宛如, 王颂, 等. 企业创新网络构建、演化与关键核心技术突破[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(7): 85-95.
ZHENG Gang, DENG Wanru, WANG Song, et al. Construction and evolution of enterprise innovation network and breakthrough of key core technologies[J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(7): 85-95.
[21]
MEYER K E, FANG T, PANIBRATOV A Y, et al. International business under sanctions[J]. Journal of World Business, 2023, 58(2): 101426.
[22]
许晖, 刘田田, 单宇. 重构资源连接:中国跨国企业如何打破海外技术封锁[J]. 南开管理评论, 2022, 25(6): 17-30.
XU Hui, LIU Tiantian, SHAN Yu. Reconstructing resource linkage: How can Chinese multinational enterprises[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2022, 25(6): 17-30.
[23]
胡保亮, 田茂利, 刘广. 资源重构能力与商业模式创新:基于动态能力束的观点[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(8): 73-80.
HU Baoliang, TIAN Maoli, LIU Guang. Resource reconfiguration capability and business model innovation: A view based on dynamic capability bundle[J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(8): 73-80.
[24]
GIROD S J G, WHITTINGTON R. Reconfiguration, restructuring and firm performance: Dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2017, 38(5): 1121-1133.
[25]
EISENHARDT K M, GRAEBNER M E. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(1): 25-32.

基金

国家自然科学基金面上项目:“新兴经济体跨国公司海外子公司的战略角色研究:设计形成、动态调整与演变规律”(72072123)
国家自然科学基金面上项目:“新兴经济体跨国公司海外子公司的战略角色研究:设计形成、动态调整与演变规律”(2021—2024)
国家自然科学基金青年项目:“创业生态系统下新创企业机会共生关系的形成及作用机理研究”(72202156)
国家自然科学基金青年项目:“创业生态系统下新创企业机会共生关系的形成及作用机理研究”(2023—2025)

PDF(1762 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/