PDF(1762 KB)
PDF(1762 KB)
PDF(1762 KB)
海外制裁下中国芯片企业创新网络重构研究
Research on the innovation network reconfiguration of Chinese chip enterprises under overseas sanctions
创新网络重构对中国芯片企业应对并抵御海外制裁具有重要价值和作用。本研究选取天津飞腾作为案例分析对象,深入剖析中国芯片企业在海外制裁冲击下重构创新网络的行为机制和底层逻辑。研究发现:(1)在海外制裁冲击下,中国芯片企业重构了创新网络的关系和结构,带来的资源变化进一步推动企业开展资源重构;(2)中国芯片企业重构技术创新网络和市场创新网络分别遵循“安全逻辑”和“竞争逻辑”,即追求关键核心技术安全可控和提高国产芯片的市场竞争力;(3)在不同重构逻辑的指引下,中国芯片企业的技术创新网络和市场创新网络的创新实现方式发生差异化转变,有助于企业从技术和市场两方面更好地应对海外制裁。本研究探明了海外制裁冲击下中国芯片企业创新网络的重构机制,不仅拓展了企业创新网络相关研究,还为海外制裁应对研究提供了新视角,能够为中国企业重构创新网络、抵御海外制裁提供有益参考与借鉴。
Innovation network reconfiguration plays a crucial role for Chinese chip enterprises in coping with overseas sanctions. This study chose Tianjin Phytium as the case to deeply analyze the behavior mechanism and underlying logic of Chinese chip enterprises' innovation network reconfiguration under the impact of overseas sanctions. The study found that: (1) Under the impact of overseas sanctions, Chinese chip enterprises reconfigure the relationship and structure of the innovation network, and drive resource reconfiguration; (2) Chinese chip enterprises follow the "security logic" and "competition logic" respectively to reconfigure the technology innovation network and market innovation network, that is, to pursue the security and control of key core technologies and improve the competitiveness of domestic chips; (3) Under the guidance of different reconfiguration logics, the innovation implementation methods of technology innovation network and market innovation network have undergone differentiated transformation, which helps Chinese chip enterprises to better cope with overseas sanctions from the aspects of both technology and market. This study explored the reconfiguration mechanism of Chinese chip enterprises' innovation network under the impact of overseas sanctions, which has not only expanded the research of innovation network, but also provided a new perspective for the study of overseas sanctions response. The research conclusion can provide useful reference for Chinese enterprises to reconfigure innovation network and resist overseas sanctions.
创新网络 / 重构行为 / 重构逻辑 / 海外制裁 / 芯片企业
innovation network / reconfiguration behavior / reconfiguration logic / overseas sanction / chip enterprise
| [1] |
杨忠, 巫强, 宋孟璐, 等. 美国《芯片与科学法案》对我国半导体产业发展的影响及对策研究:基于创新链理论的视角[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023, 26(1): 146-160.
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
Globalization, defined as trade- and FDI-related interdependence among nations, increases social welfare by transmitting managerial practices, advanced technologies, and labor skills across borders. Recent declines in FDI flows have prompted scholars to speculate on the nature, magnitude, and determinants of de-globalization trends. We investigate whether a U.S. national security-related foreign investment screening law, the Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007 (FINSA), contributes to de-globalization trends. FINSA awarded a regulator known as the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States broad new powers to revise or reject foreign acquisitions of firms in national security-related industries. Using a difference-in-differences research design, a wide variety of model specifications, and estimation samples spanning 1990–2016, we document post-FINSA declines in foreign takeovers of U.S. firms in national security-related industries. Consistent with techno-nationalism, we document that takeover declines are concentrated among research-intensive national security firms. Placebo, event-time, and robustness tests corroborate our results. Our empirical evidence suggests that foreign investment screening laws help explain the nature, magnitude, and determinants of recent de-globalization trends and prompts multinational enterprise managers to increasingly weight the political factors behind foreign investment screening laws when assessing foreign investment strategies.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
鲁若愚, 周阳, 丁奕文, 等. 企业创新网络:溯源、演化与研究展望[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(1): 217-233+14.
|
| [10] |
寿柯炎, 魏江. 后发企业如何构建创新网络:基于知识架构的视角[J]. 管理科学学报, 2018, 21(9):23-37.
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
李鑫, 魏姗, 李惠娟. 制造业生态创新网络构建及进化逻辑[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(1): 74-83.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
杨震宁, 侯一凡, 李德辉, 等. 中国企业“双循环”中开放式创新网络的平衡效应:基于数字赋能与组织柔性的考察[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(11): 184-205+12.
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
李东红, 陈昱蓉, 周平录. 破解颠覆性技术创新的跨界网络治理路径:基于百度Apollo自动驾驶开放平台的案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(4): 130-159.
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
郑刚, 邓宛如, 王颂, 等. 企业创新网络构建、演化与关键核心技术突破[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(7): 85-95.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
许晖, 刘田田, 单宇. 重构资源连接:中国跨国企业如何打破海外技术封锁[J]. 南开管理评论, 2022, 25(6): 17-30.
|
| [23] |
胡保亮, 田茂利, 刘广. 资源重构能力与商业模式创新:基于动态能力束的观点[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(8): 73-80.
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |