科研管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 46-55.DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2026.01.005

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

数实融合对高质量发展的影响研究

李佳霖1,温金燕2   

  1. 1.西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院,陕西 西安710049; 
    2.西安交通大学马克思主义学院,陕西 西安710049
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-28 修回日期:2025-07-16 接受日期:2025-07-17 出版日期:2026-01-20 发布日期:2026-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 李佳霖
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金青年项目:“数实深度融合赋能区域创新发展的路径选择与政策支持研究”(24CGL114,2024.10—2026.12)。

Research on the impact of digital-real integration on high-quality development

Li Jialin1, Wen Jinyan2

  1. 1.School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi′an Jiaotong University, Xi′an 710049, Shaanxi, China;
    2. School of Marxism, Xi′an Jiaotong University, Xi′an 710049, Shaanxi, China

  • Received:2024-08-28 Revised:2025-07-16 Accepted:2025-07-17 Online:2026-01-20 Published:2026-01-12

摘要:    数实融合能否矫正要素错配进而全面推动经济社会高质量发展是数字时代有待回应的重要问题。本文基于2011—2022年中国省级面板数据,运用双向固定效应模型分析数实融合对高质量发展的影响及作用机制。研究发现:(1)数实融合显著促进高质量发展,对创新发展、协调发展、绿色发展、开放发展、共享发展均有积极作用,但影响效应存在一定的区域差异。(2)在要素水平较高的地区,数实融合对高质量发展的促进作用更显著。(3)从作用机制看,数实融合通过降低资本要素与劳动力要素错配程度推动高质量发展,而减少要素错配进而提升全要素生产率是其中重要路径。研究结论为深化对数实融合的认识、进一步改善要素错配、优化要素投入,从而有效提升全要素生产率、释放数实融合潜力提供了新的理论视角和经验证据,也对加快数实融合实践以推动高质量发展具有启示。

关键词: 数实融合, 高质量发展, 要素错配, 要素水平, 全要素生产率

Abstract:    Whether digital-real integration can correct factor misallocation and thereby comprehensively promote economic and social high-quality development is a vital issue that needs to be addressed in the digital age. This paper used the provincial panel data from China between 2011 and 2022 and employed a two-way fixed effects model to study the impact of digital-real integration on high-quality development and its underlying mechanisms. The study found that: (1) Digital-real integration significantly promotes high-quality development, having positive effects on innovative development, coordinated development, green development, open development, and shared development, while the impact shows certain regional heterogeneity. (2) In regions with a higher level of factors, digital-real integration has a more significant promoting effect on high-quality development. (3) For underlying mechanism, digital-real integration promotes high-quality development by reducing misallocation of capital factors and labour factors, through which reducing factor misallocation and thereby enhancing total factor productivity is a significant path. The conclusions will provide a new theoretical perspective and empirical evidence for deepening the understanding of digital-real integration, improving factor misallocation, optimizing factor input, and thereby effectively enhancing total factor productivity and releasing the potential of digital-real integration. It also will have implications for accelerating the practice of digital-real integration to promote high-quality development.

Key words: digital-real integration, high-quality development, factor misallocation, factor level, total factor productivity