The comparative analysis on wind energy industry based on the multi-level perspective theory

Li Xiaofen; Feng Haihong; Wang Shengguang

PDF(1281 KB)

Science Research Management ›› 2013 ›› Issue (7) : 17-23.

The comparative analysis on wind energy industry based on the multi-level perspective theory

Li Xiaofen¹, Feng Haihong², Wang Shengguang²

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Based on Multi-Level Perspective (MLP) theory and the actor-network perspective, the evolutionary of Denmark, German, and China’s wind energy industries is analyzed in order to explore the mechanism of the industry competitiveness. Multi-case comparative studies stimulate the development of MLP theory. The analysis indicates that the MLP models for developed and developing countries are quite different: the former starts from the disruptive innovation in niche market; while the later starts from the introduction, digestion, and absorptive of the existing technologies, thus the evolutionary path of industry is also not the same. It is concluded that the management system directly affects the technological innovation and industrial development modes; the co-evolutionary of technology, market, and institution is the key element affecting the competitiveness difference of these three countries’ industries. Therefore, it is quite important to promote the widest participation of multi-agent and the diversity of technology innovation.

Key words

MLP theory / actor-network / comparative analysis / wind energy industry

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Li Xiaofen, Feng Haihong, Wang Shengguang. The comparative analysis on wind energy industry based on the multi-level perspective theory[J]. Science Research Management. 2013(7): 17-23

References

[1] 王正明. 我国风力发电产业链的培育与发展问题研究 [D].镇江: 江苏大学,2009. [2] 施鹏飞. 中国成为风能强国的差距 [R].北京:可再生能源学会风能专业委员会, 2011. [3] Smith, A., Voβ, J., Grin, J. Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi- level perspective and its challenges [J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39: 435-448. [4] Verbong, G., Geels, F. The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio- technical, multi- level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960- 2004) [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35: 1025-1037. [5] 卡萝塔· 佩雷兹著,田方萌等译. 技术革命与金融资本:泡沫与黄金时代的动力学 [C].北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2007. [6] Jacobsson, S., Bergek, A. Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of Technological systems in renewable energy technology [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2004, 13: 815-849. [7] Hekkert, M.P., Surrs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O. et al. Functions of Innovation Systems: A new approach for analyzing technological change [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2007, 74: 413-432. [8] Szarka, J. Wind power, policy learning and paradigm change [J]. Energy Policy, 2006, 34: 3041-3048. [9] Geels, F W. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study [J]. Research Policy, 2002, 31(8/9): 1257-1274. [10] Geels, F W. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory [J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33:897-920. [11] Geels, F W. Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective [J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2005, 72(6): 681-696. [12] Geels, F W, Schot, J W Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways [J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(3): 399-417. [13] Geels, F W. Analysing the breakthrough of rock ’n’ roll (1930-1970): Multi-regime interaction and reconfiguration in the multi-level perspective [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2007, 74(8): 1411-1431. [14] Geels, F W. Transformations of large technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the Dutch highway system (1950-2000) [J]. Science Technology & Human Values, 2007, 32(2):123-149. [15] Geels, F W. and Kemp, R. Dynamics in socio-technical systems: Typology of change processes and contrasting case studies [J]. Technology in Society, 2007, 29(4):441-455. [16] Latour, B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. [17] Schulz, W. Promotion of renewable energy in Germany [A]. In: Jasinski, P., Pfaffenberger, W. (Eds.). Energy and Environment: Multi- regulation in Europe [M]. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000. [18] 李俊峰, 施鹏飞, 高虎. 2010中国风能发展报告[M].海口:海南出版社, 2010. [19] Danish Energy Agency. Wind turbines in Denmark [R]. Copenhagen: the Danish Energy Agency, 2009. [20] Windheim, R. Data supplied by Dr. Rolf Windheim, Forschungszentrum Julich, on projects funded within the federal R&D wind energy program, 2000-3-17. [21] Jacobsson, S, Lauber, V The politics and policy of energy system transformation: explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology [J]. Research Policy, 2006, 34: 256-276.