The performance evaluation model of corporate social responsibility based on ISO26000 standard

Abstract

Abstract: According to G3 Standard and ISO26000 international standard, eight social expectations of the performance evaluation for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) are explored; these expectations are responsibility governance, economic development, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operations, consumer issues, and community development. Through interviews and the questionnaire survey, the model of the performance evaluation for the CSR is constructed based on the Structural Equation Model (SEM). Finally, by taking the transportation industry as example, the 39 enterprises are ranked and then based on the evaluation result, a deep analysis is conducted; the validity of the model is further proven. The research provides some guidance for the practices of the CSR in the transportation industry.

Key words: ISO26000 standard, CSR, performance evaluation, structural equation

CLC Number:

F270.5

Qi Liyun, Wei Tingting. The performance evaluation model of corporate social responsibility based on ISO26000 standard[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, (3): 84-92.

References

[1] 李喜英.可持续发展的责任伦理基础——约纳斯责任伦理学的现代效应[J].江苏行政学院学报,2008,41(5):31-36.Li Xiying. Basis of responsibility ethics with a sustainable development—modern effect of Jonas’ responsibility ethics [J]. The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute, 2008, 41(5): 31-36.
[2] 金乐琴.企业社会责任:推动可持续发展的第三种力量[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2004,14(2):121-124.Jin Leqin. Corporate social responsibility: the third force to promote the sustainable development [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2004, 14(2): 121-124.
[3] 张志强,王春香.西方企业社会责任的演化及其体系[J].宏观经济研究,2005(9):19-24.Zhang Zhiqiang, Wang Chunxiang. The evolution of the western CSR and its system [J]. Macroeconomics, 2005, (9): 19-24.
[4] Chen C M, Delmas M. Measuring corporate social performance: an efficiency perspective [J]. Production and Operations Management, 2011, 20(6): 789-804.
[5] ISO26000: 2010(E), Guidance on social responsibility [S].
[6] 2000-2001 GRI, GRI application levels (version 3.1) [S].
[7] Davis K, Blomstrom R L. Business and society: Environment and responsibility [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
[8] Kline R B. Principles and practices of structural equation modeling [M]. New York: The Guilford Press, 1998.
[9] 王江,王镜.新形势下交通运输行业特性分析[J].综合运输,2009(4):37-40.Wang Jiang, Wang Jing. Analysis on the characteristics of transportation industry under the new situation [J]. Comprehensive Transportation, 2009, (4): 37-40.
[10] Macdonald J B. Improving the promotion of CSR initiatives: a framework for understanding stakeholder communications from a dynamic learning perspective [J]. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 2010, 14(2): 77-93.
[11] Wilson I. What one company is doing about today’s demands on business [J]. STEINER, GA. 1975.
[12] Carroll A B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance [J]. Academy of management review, 1979, 4(4): 497-505.

[1]	Ran Rong, Dong Di, Hu Xuan, Fang Tingting. Inhibited or promoted: Corporate social responsibility and green technology innovation performance of enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(6): 95-106.
[2]	Ren Peimin, Zhao Shuran, Jiang Wenyuan. Research on evaluation of the compound patent portfolio based on the structural equation-group exponential lasso method [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(9): 159-168.
[3]	Zhang Jiemei, Wang Hao. The influencing factors on the willingness to participate in virtual corporate social responsibility co-creation [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(8): 90-99.
[4]	Wang Xuedong. Research on the mutual eating process between corporate social responsibility and business model innovation [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(7): 106-114.
[5]	Chen Nabo, Chen Yonghong, Tan Tongdan. The "control right" distribution and action logic in government performance evaluation [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(5): 191-199.
[6]	Yang Zhen, Ling Hongcheng, Chen Jin. Does social trust help enterprises fulfill their social responsibilities? [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(5): 143-152.
[7]	Dai Jianbing, Wang Lei. A research on prevention and control of major emergent public health risks in megacities [J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(8): 229-239.
[8]	Zheng Yi, Liu Wenbin, Song Zening. A research on performance evaluation and management of academic conference from the perspective of organisational structure [J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(3): 194-204.
[9]	. Internationalization performance evaluation of business education [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(4): 277-288.
[10]	Cheng Cong, Chi Renyong, Zhang Wei. A research on the mechanism for implementation of firms’ SCSR program [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(1): 139-150.
[11]	Liu Yuanyuan， Xu Peiyu， Liu Jingyu. Mitigation effect of TMT social capital on CSR negative events from the perspective of product market [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(1): 131-138.
[12]	Wang Feifei, Jia Chenran, Wang Xiaohan. A research on the comprehensive influence evaluation of scholars under the integration of multidimensional measurement indicators by taking the gene editing field as an example [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(1): 178-190.
[13]	Du Lihong. Creative-assets achieving, subsidiary power and reverse knowledge transfer [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(7): 85-96.
[14]	Meng Bin, Niu Erxuan, Kuang Haibo, Luo Jiaqi. An evaluation model and empirical research on CSR based on cloud model [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(7): 139-150.
[15]	. A research on the factors influencing the elderly’ purchasing decisions in life care service [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(10): 168-176.