It possesses significant research value for conducting research on the impact of coupling interaction upon innovation performance of industry-university-research institute, the research helps to perfect cooperative innovation theory and to improve innovation performance. Coupling refers to integration and complementation of innovation systems among cooperative partners and interaction means interactive behaviors among cooperative partners for achieving certain objectives. An empirical research framework is set up based on the profound studies on cooperative innovation systems coupling, interactive behaviors, and innovation performance. And with the data of survey questionnaires, research hypotheses are empirically checked through the structural equation. Current research indicates that via the influences on interactive behaviors, impacts upon innovation performance are exerted by coupling of innovation systems involving industry-university-research institute. Finally, based on the perspective of coupling interaction, some suggestions on the improvement of innovation performance from aspects, such as the selection of cooperative partners, the establishment of process management mechanism of coupling interaction innovation as well as the enhancement of operational mechanism, are put forward.
Key words
industry-university-research institute /
coupling /
interaction /
innovation performance /
structural equation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] Eom,B Y,and Lee,K.Determinants of Industry-Academy Linkages and Their Impact on Firm Performance:The Case of Korea as a Latecomer in Knowledge Industrialization[J].Research Policy,2010,39(5):625-639.
[2] 孙伟,高建,张帏等.产学研合作模式的制度创新:综合创新体[J].科研管理,2009,30(5):69-75.
[3] Annamária Inzelt.The Evolution of University Industry Government Relationships During Transition[J].Research Policy,2004(33):975-995.
[4] Barnes T.Pashby I,Gibbons A.Effective University-Industry Interaction:A multi-Case Evaluation of Collaborative R&D Projects.European Management Journal[J].2002,20 (3):272-285.
[5] 刁丽琳,朱桂龙,许治.国外产学研合作研究评述、展望和启示[J].国外经济与管理,2011,33(2):48-57.
[6] Antonio Messeni Petruzelli,A..The Tmpact of Technological Relatedness,Prior Ties, and Geographical Distance on University-Industry Collaborations:A Joint-Patent Analysis[J].Technovation,2011,(1):6-8.
[7] 陈劲.新形势下产学研战略联盟创新与发展研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009:51-52.
[8] 何建坤,周立,张继红等.研究型大学技术转移:模式研究与实证分析[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007:195-196.
[9] 谢富纪.技术转移和技术交易[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2006:88-90.
[10] 雷朝滋.对教育部广东省联合开展产学研结合试点工作的思考[J].中国高校科技与产业化,2006(11):10-15.
[11] 郭斌.知识经济下产学合作的模式、机制与绩效评价[M].北京:科学出版社,2007:30-89.
[12] 孙福全,陈宝明,王文岩.主要发达国家的产学研合作创新——基本经验及启示[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2008:1-151.
[13] 李成龙,秦泽峰.产学研合作组织耦合互动对创新绩效影响的研究[J].科学管理研究,2011(2):102-105.
[14] 吴贵生,王毅.技术创新管理[M],北京:清华大学出版社,2009:444-450.
[15] Hoegl,M.& Gemuenden,H.G.Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects:A theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence [J].Organization Science,2001,12(4):435-449.
[16] Hackman,J.R..The Design of Work Team.In J.W.Lorsch [J].Handbook of Organizational Behavior,1987b:315-342.
[17] Hackman J R.A Normative Model of Team Effectiveness[M].CT:Yale University,1983: 64-109.
[18] 张玉臣.技术转移机理研究——困惑中的寻解之路[M].北京:中国经济出版社.2009:105-251.
[19] Senge P M.The Fifth Discip Line: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization[M].New York,Double Day Currency,1990:37-45.
PDF(1219 KB)
