Network position, geographical proximity, and innovation performance: An interactive effect model

Dang Xinghua; Chang Hongjin

PDF(1520 KB)

Science Research Management ›› 2013 ›› Issue (3) : 7-13,30.

Network position, geographical proximity, and innovation performance: An interactive effect model

Dang Xinghua¹, Chang Hongjin^1,2

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The effect of interaction between network position and the geographical proximity on the enterprise’s innovation performance is studied from two aspects of network centrality and structural holes. And through multiple regression analysis on the survey data of 133 domestic enterprises, the results show that the interaction between network centrality and geographical proximity has a significantly positive effect on enterprise’s innovation performance, however the interaction between structure holes and geographical proximity has an insignificant effect on enterprise’ s innovation performance. The results also indicate that the advantage of geographical agglomerative creations largely depends on the enterprise’s network position, and the geographical space is able to change the transfer effect of information and resources in the network space.

Key words

network position / geographical proximity / interaction / innovation performance

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Dang Xinghua, Chang Hongjin. Network position, geographical proximity, and innovation performance: An interactive effect model[J]. Science Research Management. 2013(3): 7-13,30

References

[1] Burt R S. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.
[2] Andrew V S. Firm Scope Experience, Historic Multimarket Contact with Partners, Centrality, and the Relationship Between Structural Holes and Performance [J]. Organization Science, 2009, 1(20): 85-106.
[3] 郑登攀,党兴华.网络嵌入性对企业选择合作技术创新伙伴的影响 [J].科研管理, 2012, 1(33): 154-160.
[4] 陈伟,张永超等.区域装备制造业产学研合作创新网络的实证研究———基于网络结构和网络聚类的视角 [J].中国软科学, 2012(2): 96-107.
[5] Antonelli C. Collective Knowledge Communication and Innovation: the Evidence of Technological Districts [J]. Regional Studies, 2000, 6(11): 535-547.
[6] Ganesan S & Malter A J. Does Distance Still Matter? Geographic Proximity and New Product Development [J]. Joumal of Marketing, 2005, 69(4): 44-60.
[7] Whittington K B & Owen-Smith J. Networks, Propinquity, and Innovation in Knowledge-intensive Industries [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2009, 54(1): 90-122.
[8] Lahiri N. Geographic Distribution of R&D Activity: How Does It Affect Innovation Quality? [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(5): 1194-1209.
[9] Powell W W & Koput K W. Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(1): 116-145.
[10] Zaheer A & Bell G G. Benefiting from Network Position: Firm Capabilities, Structural Holes, and Performance [J]. Strategic Management Joumal, 2005, 26(9): 809-825.
[11] Arikan A T. Interfirm Knowledge Exchanges and the Knowledge Creation Capability of Clusters [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2009, 34(4): 658-676.
[12] Singh J. Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns [J]. Management Science, 2005, 51(5): 756-770.
[13] Casper S. Creating Silicon Valley in Europe: Public Policy towards New Technology Industries [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[14] Teece D. Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation: Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress [J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1992, 18(1): 1-25.
[15] Gertler M S. Best Practice? Geography, Learning and the Institutional Limits to Strong Convergence [J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2001, l: 5-26.
[16] 钱锡红,杨永福.企业网络位置、吸收能力与创新绩效 [J]. 管理世界, 2010(5): 118-129.
[17] Burt R S, Hogarth R M & Michaud C. The Social Capital of French and American Managers [J]. Organization Science, 2000, 11(2): 123-147.
[18] McEvily B. & Zaheer A. Bridging Ties: A Source of Firm Heterogeneity in Competitive Capabilities [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(12): 1133-1158.
[19] Hagedoon J & Cloodt M. Measuring Innovative Performance: Is There an Advantage in Using Multiple Indicators? [J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(8): 1365-1379.
[20] Devinnye T M. How well do Patents Measure New Product Activity? [J]. Economic Letters, 1993, 41(4): 447-450.
[21] Podsakoff P M & D W Organ. Self-reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects [J]. Journal of Management, 1986, 12(4): 531-544.
[22] Harmon H H. Modern Factor Analysis [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1967.