Comparative analysis on national design system and its implications

Abstract

Abstract: Design has already become the main focus of national strategy for acquiring industrial competitiveness and national advantage in competition. The policy for promoting design services has become an important part of national innovation policy among developed countries. National Design System (NDS) has been proposed by scholars from two aspects: One is main body related with design activities; the other is activities promoting design industry development. Based on the analysis on NDS with Finland and South Korea, the road map for the design system in China is described. Furthermore, the comparative analysis on NDS among Finland, South Korea, and China are conducted so as to explore the problem of main body missing and function deficiency of design system in China. Finally, the implications and policy suggestion are discussed.

Key words: NDS, design education, design support, design promotion, design policy

CLC Number:

F719.9

Guo Wen, Zhang Hongyun. Comparative analysis on national design system and its implications[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, (10): 56-63.

References

[1] DTI (2005). Creativity, Design and Business Performance. DTI Economics Paper No 15. London, UK: Department of Trade and Industry (DTI).
[2] Porter, M. (1998). The Competitive Advantage of Nations[M]. The Free Press.
[3] Heskett, J. (2002). Toothpicks & Logos-Design in Everyday Life[M]. Oxford University Press.
[4] Antti Ainamo,Strategic Design and Innovation Rules of the Game, Pathways to Success,International DMI Education Conference "Design Thinking: New Challenges for Designers, Managers and Organizations",April, 2008, Paris La Défense, France.
[5] Hugo Thenint,Design as a tool for innovation,A PRO INNO Europe project: Global Review of Innovation Intelligence and Policy studies, Oct,2008.
[6] DESIGN 2005-The Industrial Design Technology Programme, http://www.seeproject.org/casestudies/Design%202005%20-%20Industrial%20Design%20Technology%20Programme,2007.
[7] Gisele Raulik-Murphy, Gavin Cawood ‘National Design Systems’-a tool for policy-making,Research Seminar-Creative industries and regional policies: making place and giving space, 23-24 September 2009.
[8] Moultrie, J. & Livesey, T.F. (2009). International Design Scoreboard-Initial indicators of international design capabilities. Great Britain: IFM and University of Cambridge.
[9] Love, T. (2007a). National design infrastructures: the key to design-driven socio-economic outcomes and innovative knowledge economies. In (Ed.) IASDR 07-International Association of Societies of Design Research. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
[10] Raulik, G. (2004). Models of Design Intervention[J]. In Redmond, J., Durling, D. & De Bono, A. (Ed.) FutureGround. pp.188-201. Australia: Monash University.
[11] Sung, W.O., Song, M.J., Park, J. & Chung, K.W. (2007). Changing Roles of Design Promotion Organizations in the Global Context and a New Theoretical Model for Design Promotion System. In (Ed.) IASDR 07-International Association of Societies of Design Research. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
[12] Dahlin, T. & Svengren, L. (1996). Strategic Issues for a Design Support Organisation: The Swedish Industrial Design Foundation [J]. Design Management Review, 7(3), pp.37-42.

[1]	Kou Mingting, Shao Hanqing, Yang Yuanqi. A research on the fund allocation and management mechanism of national laboratories—— Experiences of the USA and their enlightenment [J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(6): 280-288.
[2]	Zhu Shanshan, Liu Fengchao, Feng Xue. A study of enterprises′ technology search strategies based on technology position [J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(4): 182-191.
[3]	Feng Bing, Yang Minli, Guo Lihong. A study of the influence mechanism of GVCGFs investment on follow-up financing of entrepreneurial firms [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(4): 112-124.
[4]	Zhang Chuan, Zhang Tao. Effect of budget control system on scientific research funds spending performance [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(4): 135-144.
[5]	Zhang Xun. A research on the effectiveness of basic scientific research of industry-specific universities by taking Beijing Jiaotong University as an example [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(12): 323-326.
[6]	Quan Xiaofeng, Yin Hongying. Influence of venture capital ownership on stock price crash risk [J]. Science Research Management, 2017, 38(12): 89-98.
[7]	Zheng Yi, Qin Bingtao. An empirical study of energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth based on the ARDL Model from 1970 to 2010 in China [J]. Science Research Management, 2016, 37(8): 130-139.
[8]	Qu Wan, Feng Haihong. Technological spillover effects of high-tech industries on service firms [J]. Science Research Management, 2016, 37(7): 71-80.
[9]	Sun Dongsheng, Xu Zhiwei. A research on the credit risk and issue limit of local government bonds [J]. Science Research Management, 2016, 37(5): 150-160.
[10]	Wang Boya, Xiong Chai, Lu Xiaoyu. A research on the percentages of government investment at different stages of R&D [J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(6): 75-80.
[11]	Huang Ping. Single factor efficiency analysis in different types of technological innovation activities [J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(11): 64-70.
[12]	WANG Dong-Mei. The evaluation of scientific research on the school funds based on PCA-DEA [J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(4): 102-105.
[13]	REN Shu-Hua, WANG Sheng, WANG Li. The development of tourist industry—Taking Zhoushan Islands as an example [J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(4): 136-142.
[14]	Wu Weiwei, Yu Bo， Yang Ying . Approaches for the promotion of technology management capability of enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(3): 59-66 .
[15]	Wang Zongjun, Xu Xing, Xia Tian . R&D personal measurement and evaluation: A literature review [J]. Science Research Management, 2008, 29(4): 89-94 .