The performance evaluation index system of housing security of China’s local government—Based on a two-dimensional perspective of objective and benchmarking

Abstract

Abstract: Housing security has become a prominent problem in the public governance; however a comprehensive index system to evaluate the performance of local government housing security has not been constructed yet. Based on the basic theory of public sector performance evaluation, a two-dimensional conceptual model of performance evaluation is built, and a performance evaluation index system of housing security for China’local government is designed, which includes two first-class indexes, four second-class indexes, and 18 third-class indexes. The method calculating the overall evaluation value of housing security performance of China’local government has been given. And a case study is made to proof the maneuverability of the index system. As methods and tools, the index system designed is of great importance to promote China’s housing security.

Key words: housing security, performance evaluation, index system, local government

CLC Number:

G311

Gao Yi, Qi Wei, Yi Yong. The performance evaluation index system of housing security of China’s local government—Based on a two-dimensional perspective of objective and benchmarking[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, (6): 154-160.

References

[1] Berman, Evan & Wang, Xiaohu. Performance Measurement in U.S. Counties: Capacity for Reform [J].Public Administration Review, 2000, 60(5):409-420.
[2] Arellano-Gault, David. The Evaluation of Performance in the Mexican Federal Government: A Study of the Monitoring Agencies' Modernization Process [J]. Public Administration Review, 2011, 72(1):135-142.
[3] Lee, Jack Yun-jie & Wang, Xiaohu. Assessing the Impact of Performance-Based Budgeting: A Comparative Analysis across the United States, Taiwan, and China [J] Public Administration Review, 2009, 69:S60-S66.
[4] Ho, Alfred Tat-Kei. PBB in American Local Governments: It’s More than a Management Tool [J]. Public Administration Review, 2011, 71(3):391-401.
[5] 陈振明.公共管理学——一种不同于传统行政学的研究途径[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:27.
[6] 王臻荣,任晓春.我国地方政府绩效模型的构建与分析[J].中国行政管理,2011(11):24-28.
[7] 吴建南,阎波. 地方政府绩效评估体系的路径选择——福建的分析[J].中国行政管理,2008(2): 25-29.
[8] 刘志刚,胡税根,刘静.辽宁省级部门绩效评估模型及实证研究[J].科研管理,2011,32(1): 106-110.
[9] 中国行政管理学会课题组.政府部门绩效评估研究报告[J].中国行政管理,2006(5):11-16.
[10] 吴宾,孙慧慧.廉租住房保障的政府绩效评估初探[J].长春工程学院学报(社会科学版),2011,12(1):44-48.
[11] Natividade-Jesus, E., J. Coutinho-Rodrigues and C.H. Antunes. A Multicriteria Decision Support System for Housing Evaluation[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2007, 43: 779-790.
[12] Kim,S.S., et al. Development of a Housing Performance Evaluation Model for Multi-family Residential Building in Korea[J]. Building and Environment, 2005, 40(80):1103-1116.
[13] In,J.K.,Y.K. Geun and Y.Juhyun. Estimation of the Tenants’ Benefits Residing in Public Rental Housing with Unit Size Constraint in Korea[J]. Urban Studies, 2004,41(8):1521.
[14] 王乐夫,蔡立辉.公共管理学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:456.
[15] 安萌.公共部门的绩效评估研究综述[J].中国集体经济,2008(6):30-31.
[16] Behn RD. Why measure performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures [J]. Public Administration Review, 2003,63(5): 586-606.
[17] Peter F. Drucker. The Practice of Management[M]. New York: Harper Press, 1954.
[18] Alexnder Kouzmin et al. Benchmarking and Performance Measurement in Public Sectors: Towards Learning for Agency Effectiveness [J]. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 1999, 12(2):121-144.
[19] 曹信邦.政府社会保障绩效评估指标体系研究[J].中国行政管理,2006(7):30-34.