Abstract: There is a growing body of literature that recognizes the importance of academic influence comprehensive evaluation. Evidence suggests that academic influence comprehensive evaluation of university researchers is among the practically important factors for promoting the overall development of the nation, ensuring appropriate systems of universities and supporting for university researchers.  Lack of rationality and comprehensiveness of scientific evaluation has existed as a major problem for many years. A considerable amount of literature has been published on Science Research Management. These studies explore in practice to figure out the development trend of comprehensive evaluation of academic influence energetically. In the scientific 2.0 era, it is one of the most widely indispensable way to demonstrate that data from several sources have identified the increased the traditional measurement indicators and Altmetrics indicators associated with achieving a more comprehensive and confirming the effectiveness of evaluation. Scholars have long debated the impact of academic influence on the creation and diffusion of Altmetrics indicators. The research to date has tended to focus on traditional measurement dimension rather than Altmetrics dimension. Recent developments in the field of the central issue have led to a renewed interest in Altmetrics. The study was conducted in the form of a survey, with data of the Beijing University of Technology researchers as an example being gathered via the ResearchGate website emerged as a powerful platform for social and intellectual needs. In addition, the network media platform has been thought of as a key factor in the data of influence indicator of university researchers. A combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches was used in the data analysis. The approach to empirical research adopted for this study was one of classical comprehensive evaluation methods. The central thesis of this paper is that using principal component analysis method to build indicators system and evaluation model, the solution was then assayed for evaluation using empowerment act. This paper describes the design and implementation of constructing evaluation system and accurately implementing evaluation. Therefore, it makes a major contribution to put forward the corresponding countermeasures by analyzing the concrete evaluation results. This study provides new insight into improving the evaluation system of university teachers' scientific research.On the one hand, it proves the feasibility and necessity of using Research Gate as an academic social platform to evaluate the academic influence of university researchers. On the other hand, considering the particularity of the evaluation object and the diversity of evaluation dimensions, the platform provides basic data as the carrier to build an appropriate evaluation index system, and effectively deal with these indicators (correlation analysis,principal component analysis) as a measurement tool and empowerment. The evaluation results are explanatory and scientific, reflecting the level of academic competence and academic exchanges of the evaluation objects, and evaluating outstanding academic leaders and researchers with potential for development. Based on the academic exchange behavior on the website platform, scientific researchers produce corresponding Substitution Measurement Index data, which combines with the traditional academic influence evaluation dimension. It is helpful to comprehensively understand the research results and exchange cooperation of university scientific researchers, so as to evaluate their comprehensive academic influence. To grasp the academic influence of scientific researchers in macro level, promote academic exchanges and enhance academic ability in micro level, form a healthy and positive academic research atmosphere, and promote the steady development of scientific research undertakings.Under the environment of increasing promotion of Web 2.0 social media platform, aiming at the construction of evaluation system, the main conclusions are as follows: this paper provides valuable reference for the future application of alternative metrology to academic impact evaluation more fully, and proves that index fusion can achieve more ideal and objective evaluation results. In addition, the introduction of skyline algorithm also expands the idea for the rational use of information obtained from the network academic exchange platform.Comprehensive evaluation based on academic interactive media is imperative. Therefore, it is necessary to further encourage and stimulate scientific researchers to interact and share research results in academic media. On the one hand, it can promote more comprehensive and timely scientific exchanges and stimulate innovation, on the other hand, it can also provide data soil for scientific research managers to conduct comprehensive academic evaluation.This study systematically reviews the data for academic influence of university scientific researchers, aiming to provide the applicability and effectiveness of the evaluation model. Due to practical constraints such as particularity of the example, this paper cannot provide a comprehensive review of the overall situation of colleges and universities.

Key words: academic influence evaluation, university researchers, ResearchGate, principal component analysis, Skyline method