In order to make an objective judgment on the actual situation of IPR protection in China, this article investigates 4,768 judicatory cases of IPR infringement in recent years and focus on the cost of IPR protection and IPR infringement. The results showed that the problem of “high (monetary) cost” of IPR protection is not significant, but the problem of “long cycle length” do exist, which is mostly owing to the too long procedure of IPR confirmation. As to the cost of IPR infringement, the problem of “low compensation” is very prominent. The courts always adopt the rule of pre-established damages when determining compensation, which usually results in the fact that the amount of compensation cannot make up the protection cost of right holders. Its key cause is the problem of “difficult to prove”. This paper suggests to increase the penalties for infringement of IPR and enhance the payout of infringers, while solving the problem of “difficult to prove” to increase the compensation for right holders. In addition, China should improve the procedure of IPR re-examination in order to thoroughly resolve the problem of “long cycle”.
Key words
IPR /
cost of IPR protection /
cost of IPR infringement /
judicatory cases
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 吴汉东.中国知识产权法制建设的评价与反思[J].中国法学,2009(1):51-68.Wu Handong. The review and consideration of the chinese intellectual property law [J]. China Legal Science, 2009(1):51-68.
[2] 詹映.我国知识产权保护水平的实证研究——国际比较与适度性评判[J].科学学研究, 2013(9):1347-1354.Zhan Ying.Empirical research on the protection level of intellectual property right in China—International compare and the appropriateness evaluation [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2013(9):1347-1354.
[3] USITC. China: Effects of intellectual property infringement and indigenous innovation policies on the U.S. economy[R], May,2011,http://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/pub4226.pdf.
[4] 王利明.美国惩罚性赔偿制度研究[J]. 比较法研究,2003(5):1-15.Wang Liming. Study on the regime of punitive damage in the united states [J]. Journal of Comparative Law, 2003(5):1-15.
[5] 和育东.专利侵权损害赔偿计算制度:变迁、比较与借鉴[J]. 知识产权,2009(5):7-18. He Yudong. The regime ofpatent infringement damages calculation: Change, comparison and reference [J]. Intellectual Property, 2009(5):7-18.
[6] 李明德.关于《专利法修订草案(送审稿)》的几点思考[J].知识产权, 2013(9):3-8.Li Mingde. Some considerations on the draft of patent law amendment [J]. Intellectual Property, 2013(9):3-8.
[7] 李晓秋.专利侵权惩罚性赔偿制度:引入抑或摒弃[J].法商研究,2013(4):136-144.Li Xiaoqiu. Punitive damage in the patent infringement: Introduce or abandon [J].Studies in Law and Business, 2013(4):136-144.
[8] 董雪兵, 朱慧, 康继军, 宋顺风. 转型期知识产权保护制度的增长效应研究[J]. 经济研究, 2012(8):4-17.Dong Xuebing, Zhu Hui, Kang Jijun and Song Shunfeng, The effect of intellectual property rights protection system on Chinese economic growth during transition period[J]. Economic Research, 2012(8):4-17.
[9] 贺宁馨,袁晓东. 我国专利侵权损害赔偿制度有效性的实证研究[J].科研管理,2012(4):124-130.He Ningxin, Yuan Xiaodong. The effectiveness about the compensation system for the patent infringement damage in China [J]. Science Research Management, 2012(4):124-130.
PDF(1 KB)
