A study on the relationship between paternalistic leadership and individual innovative behaviors in Chinese firms

PDF(1 KB)

Science Research Management ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7) : 105-112.

Wang Shuanglong

Author information +

History +

Abstract

How to improve employees' innovative behaviors is an important issue for the managers of the Chinese enterprises in the era of knowledge-based economy. However, current researches paid little attention on the influential mechanisms of paternalistic leadership to individual innovative behaviors in the Chinese context. Based on a survey of Chinese employees, the conclusion is that authoritarian leadership has a negative effect on individual innovative behaviors, and benevolent-moral leadership has a positive effect on the behaviors. Meanwhile, creative self-efficacy and Chinesetraditionality has a mediating and moderating effects on the relationship between paternalistic leadership and individual innovative behaviors respectively.

Key words

paternalistic leadership / individual innovative behaviors / creative self-efficacy / Chinese traditionality

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Wang Shuanglong. A study on the relationship between paternalistic leadership and individual innovative behaviors in Chinese firms[J]. Science Research Management. 2015, 36(7): 105-112

References

[1] Oldham, G. R., Cummings, A. Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39: 607-634. [2] Shalley, C.E. Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity[J], Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38(2): 483-503. [3] Anderson, N.R., King, N. Innovation in organizations. In C. L. Cooper I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology [M] (8:1-33). Chichester: Wiley. 1993. [4] Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. Acultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organization. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon, Management of organizations in the Chinese context[M]. London: Macmillan. 2000. [5] Redding, G. (1990), The spirit of Chinese capitalism[M], Walter de Gruyter, New York, NY. [6] Westwood, R. I. (Ed.) (1992). Organizational behaviour: A southeast asian perspective [M]. Hong Kong: Longman Group. [7] 郑伯埙. 家长权威与领导行为之关系:一个台湾民营企业主持人的个案研究[J], 中央研究院民族学研究所集刊, 1995(79):119-173.Cheng, B.S. Paternalistic authority and leadership: A case study of a taiwanese CEO [J]. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academic Sinica, 1995(79): 119-173. [8] Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. Self-determination in a work organization [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74(4): 580-590. [9] Schriesheim C A, Neider L L, Scandura T A. Delegation and leader-member exchange: Main effects, moderators, and measurement issues [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41(3):298-318. [10] Burress, M. A. The relationship between team leader behaviors and team performance and satisfaction[C]. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of North Texas, Denton, TX. 1996. [11] Ford, C.. A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21: 1112-1142. [12] Tierney, P., Farmer, S.M. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45:1137-1148. [13] Settoon R P, Bennett N, Liden R C. Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organization support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity [J].Journal of applied psychology, 1996, 81(3): 219. [14] Ashforth, B. Petty tyranny in organizations[J]. Human Relations, 1994, 47: 755-778. [15] Tierney, P., Farmer, S.M. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45:1137-1148. [16] Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1988, 13(3), 471-481. [17] Tierney, P., Farmer, S.M. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45:1137-1148. [18] 郑伯埙, 谢佩鸳, 周丽芳. 校长领导作风, 上下关系品质及教师角色外行为:转型式与家长式领导的效果[J]. 本土心理学研究, 2002(17): 105-161.Cheng, B.S., Shieh, P.Y., & Chou, L.F. The principal's leadership, leader-member exchange quality, and the teacher's extra-role behavior: The effects of transformational and paternalistic leadership [J]. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 2002, 17: 105-161. [19] Amabile, T.M. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations [J]. In B.M. Shaw &Cummings (Eds.). Research in Organizational Behavior, 1988, 10: 123-167. [20] Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control[M]. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company. 1997. [21] Major, D.A., Kozlowski, S.W.J. Newcomer information seeking: Individual and contextual influences [J]. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1997, 5: 16-28. [22] Tierney, P., Farmer, S.M. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45:1137-1148. [23] Farth, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. Impetus for action: Actual analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42:421-444. [24] 郑伯埙, 周丽芳, 黄敏萍, 樊景立, 彭泗清, 家长式领导的三元模式:中国大陆企业组织的证据[J], 本土心理学(台湾), 2003(20):209-250.Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F. Huang, M. P., Farh, J. L., & Peng S.P. A triad model of paternalistic leadership: Evidence from business organizations in mainland China [J].Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies (Taiwan), 2003(20): 209-250. [25] Scott, S.G., Bruce, R.A. Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37: 580-607. [26] Tierney, P., Farmer, S.M. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45:1137-1148. [27] Farth, J. L., Earley, P.C., & Lin, S. C. Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42: 421-444. [28] Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M.S. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review [J]. Journal of Management, 2005, 31: 874-900.