This article tries to dig internal factors from the team level. Organizational behavior, management science and other disciplines provide this paper with a theoretical support, from which this paper extracts the main factors affecting the cooperation level of overall team: Heterogeneity, the complexity of the organizational structure, complete and balanced role, and team conflict. Besides, this paper also uses social network to analyze the team cooperative situation through questionnaires, using structural equation model methods, and the paper gets some main conclusions:(1) Large-scale groups (25 people or more) are inferior to small teams (10 people) in cooperative network density, the intensity of cooperation and cohesion; groups founded in short time have strongest team cohesion; and the more the teachers in teams the weaker the team cohesion; (2) Gender and age heterogeneity does not adversely affect cooperation, on the contrary, has a positive effect on the cooperative network and the cooperation cohesion; task-oriented heterogeneity has negative effect on cooperation, indicating that university research team did not achieve cooperation in essence;(3) The levels and Divided small groups in large-scale teams are generally above normal levels, leading the team organizational structure more complex and resulting higher costs of communication and coordination; and (4) Research team conflict has played a negative role on university research cooperation, the negative effects of the program conflict is more significant, thankfully, the conflict in university research team is not very strong, it has a certain relationship with the high quality of the members in team.
Key words
scientific research team /
cooperative degree /
influencing factors /
cooperation network
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 李侠.中国科研中的合作困境问题[J]. 科技导报, 2012(13): 8.
[2] 陈春花,杨映珊.基于团队运作模式的科研管理研究[J].科技进步与对策,2002(4):79-81.
[3] 张虹波,赵晓宁.科研群体与科研团队模式探讨[J]. 科技·人才·市场, 2003(5): 25-27.
[4] 蒋日富,霍国庆,谭红军.科研团队知识创新绩效影响要素研究——基于我国国立科研机构的调查分析[J].科学学研究, 2007, 25(2): 364-372.
[5] Dionne S D, Yammarino F J, Atwater L E, et al. Transformational leadership and team performance[J].Journal of organizational change management, 2004, 17(2): 177-193.
[6] Hemlin S, Rasmussen S B. The shift in academic quality control [J]. Science, Technology & Human Values, 2006, 31(2): 173-198.
[7] 刘惠琴,张德.高校学科团队中魅力型领导对团队创新绩效影响的实证研究[J].科研管理,2007(4):185-191.
[8] 汤超颖,朱月利,商继美.变革型领导,团队文化与科研团队创造力的关系[J].科学学研究,2011,29(2): 275-282.
[9] Margerison C, McCann D. Team mapping: A new approach to managerial leadership [J]. Journal of European Industrial Training, 1984, 8(1): 12-16.
[10] Muchinsky P M, Monahan C J. What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit [J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1987, 31(3): 268-277.
[11] Partington D, Harris H. Team role balance and team performance: An empirical study [J]. Journal of Management Development, 1999, 18(8): 694-705.
[12] Kristof-Brown A L, Zimmerman R D, Johnson E C. Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-job person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit [J]. Personnel psychology, 2005, 58(2): 281-342.
[13] 戴大双,冯志刚,徐坤.角色模型在R&D团队关键角色选择中的应用研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005(3):122-124.
[14] 邵俊.构建角色均衡团队的知识共享策略研究[D].南京航空航天大学,2007.
[15] 赵蕾.研发团队成员角色匹配对团队绩效的影响研究[D].山东财经大学,2013.
[16] Partington Daft R L, Lengel R H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design [J]. Management science, 1986, 32(5): 554-571.
[17] Bunderson J S, Sutcliffe K M. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects [J]. Academy of management journal, 2002, 45(5): 875-893.
[18] Dahlin M, Joneborg N, Runeson B. Stress and depression among medical students: A cross-sectional study [J]. Medical education, 2005, 39(6): 594-604.
[19] Bercovitz J, Feldman M. The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography [J]. Research Policy, 2011, 40(1): 81-93.
[20] 蒋跃进,梁栋,余雁.基于团队的知识共享和知识形成机理研究[J].运筹与管理,2004(5):151-154.
[21] Townsend J M, Wasserman T. Sexual attractiveness: Sex differences in assessment and criteria [J]. Evolution and Human Behavior, 1998, 19(3): 171-191.
[22] 宋源. 团队合作行为影响因素研究[J]. 理论界, 2009 (6): 197-199.
[23] Jehn K A. A multi-method examination of the benefits and detriments of intergroup conflict [J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1995: 256-282.
[24] Jehn K A, Northcraft G B, Neale M A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups [J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1999, 44(4): 741-763.
[25] 汪洁.团队任务冲突对团队任务绩效的影响机理研究[D].浙江大学,2009.
[26] 耿紫珍,刘新梅,沈力.合作目标促进科研团队创造力的机理研究[J].科研管理,2012(8):113-119.
[27] Partington D, Harris H. Team role balance and team performance: An empirical study [J]. Journal of Management Development, 1999, 18(8): 694-705.
[28] Jehn K A. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups [J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1997: 530-557.
[29] Brett J M. Negotiating group decisions [J]. Negotiation journal, 1991, 7(3): 291-310.
[30] 蔡翔,史烽.高校科研团队冲突、行为整合与绩效的关系[J].技术经济与管理研究,2011(12):39-42.
[31] Anderson N R, West M A. Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory [J]. Journal of organizational behavior, 1998, 19(3): 235-258.
[32] 庞弘燊,方曙,杨波,付鑫金.科研团队合作紧密度的分析研究——以大连理工大学WISE实验室为例[J].图书情报工作,2011(4):28-32.
