Patent technology licensing and innovation performance of licensee firms: The moderating effects of three different types of proximity

PDF(1 KB)

Science Research Management ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4) : 91-100.

Liu Fengchao¹, Wu Delin^1,2, Ma Rongkang¹

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Using the data of patent licenses and patent applications in 2000-2010 from the State Intellectual Property Office in China, this paper studies the impact of patent technology licensing on firm innovation output, and examines the moderating effect of three types of proximity on the relationship between them. The results show that patent technology licensing plays a significant role in promoting firm innovation output, and this relationship is moderated by different types of proximity. Specifically, the technological proximity negatively moderates the impact of patent technology licensing on innovation performance of licensee firms, while the organizational proximity positively moderates the relationship between patent technology licensing and firm innovation performance. By contrast, the moderating effect of geographic proximity is not significant.

Key words

patent licensing / firm innovation output / technological learning / proximity

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Liu Fengchao, Wu Delin, Ma Rongkang. Patent technology licensing and innovation performance of licensee firms: The moderating effects of three different types of proximity[J]. Science Research Management. 2015, 36(4): 91-100

References

[1] Cesaroni, F. Technological outsourcing and product diversification: Do markets for technology affect firms'strategies?[J]. Research Policy, 2004, 33(10): 1547-1564. [2] 世界银行和国务院发展研究中心联合课题组. 2030年的中国:建设现代、和谐、有创造力的社会[M]. 北京: 中国财政经济出版社, 2012. World Bank, Development Research Center of the State Council, P.R.C.. China 2030: Building a modern, harmonious, and creative high-income society [M]. Beijing: China Financial & Economic Publishing House, 2012. [3] Atuahene-Gima, K. Determinants of inward technology licensing intentions: An empirical analysis of Australian engineering firms[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1993, 10(3): 230-240. [4] Pitkethly, R.H. Intellectual property strategy in Japanese and UK companies: Patent licensing decisions and learning opportunities[J]. Research Policy, 2001, 30(3): 425-442. [5] Johnson, D.K.N. 'Learning-by-licensing': R&D and technology licensing in Brazilian invention[J]. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 2002, 11(3): 163-177. [6] 王元地,刘凤朝,潘雄锋. 专利技术许可与中国企业创新能力发展[J]. 科学学研究,2011,29(12): 1821-1905. Wang Yuandi, Liufengchao, Panxiongfeng. Patent technology licensing and the growth of Chinese firms' innovation capabilities[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2011, 29(12): 1821-1905. [7] 王元地,刘凤朝,潘雄锋. 专利许可、技术学习与企业创新能力成长[J].研究与发展管理,2012,24(12): 55-63. Wang Yuandi, Liufengchao, Panxiongfeng. Patent licensing,technological learning and the growth of firms' innovation capabilities[J]. R&D Management, 2012, 24(12): 55-63. [8] Chesbrough, H.W. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology[M]. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2003. [9] Wang, Y., Zhou, Z., Li-Ying, J. The impact of licensed-knowledge attributes on the innovation performance of licensee firms: evidence from the Chinese electronic industry[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2012, 18(5): 1-17. [10] Leone, M.I., Reichstein, T.Licensing-in fosters rapid invention! The effect of the grant-back clause and technological unfamiliarity[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012, 33(8): 965-985. [11] Guan, J., Mok, C., Yam, R., Chin, K., Pun, K. Technology transfer and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese firms[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2006, 73(6): 666-678. [12] Tsai, K.H., Wang, J.C. External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese technological innovation survey[J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38(3): 518-526. [13] Zhao, Y., Wong, P., Subramanian, A., Hang, C. New insight into technology licensing strategy and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese latecomers in high-tech industries[C]. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management(IEEM), 6-9 Dec. 2011, Singapore, Singapore. [14] 冯忠垒, 陈圻. 事前技术许可条件下被许可企业自主创新投资决策研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2009, 27(3): 453-458. Feng Zhonglei, Chen Qi. Research on independent innovation investment decisions of the licensee under ex ante licensing[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2009, 27(3): 453-458. [15] Oliver, C. Determinants of inter-organizational relationships: Integration and future directions[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1990, 15(2): 241-265. [16] Balland, P.A. Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks: Evidence from research and development projects within the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) industry[J]. Regional Studies, 2012, 46(6): 741-756. [17] Lowe, J., Taylor, P. R&D and technology purchase through license agreements: Complementary strategies and complementary assets[J]. R&D Management, 1998, 28(4): 263-278. [18] Cassiman, B, Veugelers, R. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition [J]. Management Science, 2006, 51(1): 68-82. [19] Kim, Y.J., Vonortas, N.S. Technology licensing partners[J]. Journal of Economics and Business, 2006, 58(4): 273-289. [20] Laursen, K., Leone, M.I., Torrisi, S. Technological exploration through licensing: New insights from the licensee's point of view[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2010, 19(3): 871-897. [21] Powell, W.W., Kaput, K., Smith-Doerr, L.Inter-organizational collaboration and locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41(1): l16-145. [22] Lane, P.J., Lubatkin, M. Relative absorptive capacity and inter-organizational learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998, 19(5): 461-477. [23] Amin, A., Wilkinson, F. Learning, proximity and industrial performance: An introduction[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1999, 23(2):121-125. [24] Boschma, R.A. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment[J].Regional Studies, 2005, 39(1): 61-74. [25] Knoben, J., Oerlemans, L.A.G. Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2006, 8(2): 71-89. [26] Torre, A., Rallet, A. Proximity and localization[J]. Regional Studies, 2005, 39(1): 47-59. [27] Howells, J. Tacit knowledge, innovation, and technological transfer[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Managenment, 1996, 8(2): 81-105. [28] Maskell, P., Malmberg, A. The competitiveness of firms and regions, 'ubiquitification' and the importance of localized learning[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 1999, 6(1): 9-25. [29] Aydogan, N., Lyon, T.Spatial proximity and complementarities in the trading of tacit knowledge[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2004, 22(8-9): 1115-1135. [30] Antonelli, C. Collective knowledge communication and innovation: The evidence of technological districts[J]. Regional Studies, 2000, 34(6): 535-547. [31] Silvestre, B.S., Dalcol, P.R.T. Geographical proximity and innovation: Evidences from the Campos Basin oil & gas industrial agglomeration-Brazil [J]. Technovation, 2009, 29(8): 546-561. [32] Schamp, E.W., Rentmeister, B., Lo, V. Dimensions of proximity in knowledge-based networks: The cases of investment banking and automobile design[J]. European Planning Studies, 2004, 12(5):607-624. [33] Zeller, C. North Atlantic innovative relations of Swiss pharmaceuticals and the proximities with regional biotech arenas[J]. Economic Geography, 2004, 80(1): 83-111. [34] Kirat, T., Lung, Y. Innovation and proximity territories as loci of collective learning processes[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 1999, 6(1): 27-38. [35] Cooke, P., Morgan, K. The Associational economy: Firms, regions, innovation[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. [36] Amin, A., Cohendet, P.Organizational learning and governance through embedded practices[J]. Journal of management and governance, 2000, 4(1-2): 93-116. [37] 李琳,杨田.地理邻近和组织邻近对产业集群创新影响效应——基于对我国汽车产业集群的实证研究[J]. 中国软科学,2011,(9):133-143. Li Lin, Yang Tian. Effect of geographical proximity and organisational proximity on innovations of industrial cluster: An empirical research based on automobile industry clusters in China[J]. China Soft Science Magazine, 2011,(9):133-143. [38] Hong, W., Su, Y.S. The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university–industry collaborations: An analysis based on Chinese patent data[J]. Research Policy, 2012, 23(6): 1-11. [39] Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993, 108(3): 577-598. [40] Aiken, L.S., West, S G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions [M]. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.