A research on the contribution of financial support and governmental and corporate investment toscientific innovation

Science Research Management ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3) : 57-63.

Yu Liping

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Based on the panel data, this paper analyzed mainly the contribution of scientific fund investment structure to national innovation. The results of research indicate that the governmental and corporate investment has a significant contribution to scientific output and the contribution to scientific innovation is maximized by governmental scientific investment, seconded by corporate scientific investment and minimized by the full-time equivalent of the researchers. However, the bank scientific loan has an insignificant contribution to scientific innovation and its proportion in scientific investment is declining annually. The decline exposes deeply some problems existed in the scientific financial system.

Key words

scientific finance / scientific investment / scientific output / contribution

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Yu Liping. A research on the contribution of financial support and governmental and corporate investment toscientific innovation[J]. Science Research Management. 2015, 36(3): 57-63

References

[1] Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth [J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1979, 10 (1):92-116. [2] Griliches Z. Market Value, R&D, and patents [J]. Economics Letters, 1981, 7 (2): 183-187. [3] Hall B.H, Griliches Z, Hausman J.A. Patents and R&D: Is there a lag? [J]. International Economic Review, 1986,27(2): 265-283. [4] Lev B., Sougiannis T. The capitalization, amortization and value relevance of R&D[J].Journal of Accounting and Economics.1996,21(1):107-138. [5] Jeff P.Boone, Raman K.K. Off-balance sheet R&D assets and market liquidity[J].Journal of Accounting and Public Policy.2001,20(2):97-128. [6] Inonu E. The influence of cultural factors on scientific production[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 56(1):137-146. [7] Rousseau S.,Rousseau R.Data envelopment analysis as a tool for constructing scientometric[J]. Scientometrics, 1997,40(1):45-56. [8] 李燕萍,郭玮,黄霞. 科研经费的有效使用特征及其影响因素[J]. 科学学研究,2009(11):1685-1691. [9] 余昕,王冬,韩楠,王欣. 发达国家科研投入效率初探[J]. 科技进步与对策,2007(8):129-131. [10] 赵正洲,王鹏. 高等农业院校科研投入产出的定量研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2005(2):145-147. [11] 丁宁宁,王红梅. 高校论文成果与科研投入之间关系的实证研究[J]. 山东经济,2008(1):143-146. [12] 谢亚兰. 美国世界一流大学科研经费投入与产出相关性实证研究[J]. 高教探索,2008(5):51-54. [13] 李涛,黄晓蓓,王超. 企业科研投入与经营绩效的实证研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2008(7):170-174. [14] 徐凯,高山行. 中国高等院校科研投入——产出研究[J]. 研究与发展管理,2008(2):97-101. [15] 毛莉菊,席庆奎,张彬,俞建飞,钱宝英. 南农大SCI论文量与科研经费投入及科研激励机制的关系分析[J]. 农业情报图书学刊,2006(4):162-164. [16] 余文盛. 新建本科院校科研经费投入与产出的灰色关联分析[J]. 四川文理学院学报,2010(1):53-57. [17] 雷彦斌,李徽,欧国立. 基于政府科技投入的中国转制科研机构效率评价与研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2010(7):34-37. [18] 肖晋芬,仲实.科研投入产出模型在高校科研绩效评价中的应用[J]. 科技管理研究,2010(2):81-82. [19] 孙世敏,项华录,兰博. 基于DEA的我国地区高校科研投入产出效率分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2007(7):18-21. [20] 骆珣,卢婵君. 基于DEA的北京市转制科研机构投入产出效率评价[J]. 生产力研究,2007(9):75-76. [21] 赵强强,陈洪转,俞斌. 利用截面数据对地域高校科研经费使用效率的评价[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2009(9):119-122. [22] 常家芸,汪洋. 我国农业科研投入效率的实证分析[J]. 山西财经大学学报,2010(4):38-40. [23] 王海,叶元煦. 科技金融结合效益的评价研究[J]. 管理科学,2003(4):68-72. [24] 肖科. 政策性金融对我国自主创新成果转化的贡献研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2009(12):106-110. [25] Huang C L,Yoon K.Multiattribute decision making:Methods and applications[M].NY:springer-Verlag,1981:12-34. [26] Mundlak Y. Empirical productions free of management bias[J]. Journal of Farm Economics,1961(43): 44-56. [27] J.M.伍德里奇. 计量经济学导论现代观点[M] .中国人民大学出版社,2003:438-439.