Advice network and individual knowledge creation: The moderating role of personality traits

Science Research Management ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3) : 21-28.

Zhang Hua, Geng Lijun

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Basing on the contingency perspective of network research, this paper explores the moderating role of personality traits on relationship between advice network and knowledge creation. The empirical results of six knowledge-intensive companies and institutions' knowledge worker's advice network show that conscientiousness moderate positively the relationship between centrality and knowledge creation; extroversion moderate positively the relationship between structural hole and knowledge creation. The interactive effect of centrality and structural hole on knowledge creation is not supported by our empirical work. This paper contributes to a better understanding of the actor's knowledge creation mechanism, and discusses the limitation and the future possible extension.

Key words

knowledge creation / advice network / centrality / structural hole / Big Five Personality

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Zhang Hua, Geng Lijun. Advice network and individual knowledge creation: The moderating role of personality traits[J]. Science Research Management. 2015, 36(3): 21-28

References

[1] Simonton D. K. Biograpyical typicality, eminence and achievement styles[J]. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1986,20(1):14-22. [2] Oldham G. R., Cummings A. Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 1996,39(3):607-634. [3] Perry-Smith J. E., Shalley C. E. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 2003,28(1):89-106. [4] Burt R. S. Structural holes and good ideas[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2004. 110(2): 349-399. [5] Fleming L., Mingo S., Chen D. Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly. 2007, 52(3): 443-475. [6] Zhou J., Shin S. J., Brass D. J, et al. Social networks, personal values, and creativity: Evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2009, 94(6): 1544-1552. [7] Anderson M. H. Social networks and the cognitive motivation to realize network opportunities: A study of managers' information gathering behaviors[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2008, 29(1): 51-78. [8] Baer, M. The Strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: A comprehensive examination and extension[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, 95(3): 592-601. [9] Reinholt, M., Pedersen T., Foss N. J. Why a central network position isn't enough: The role of motivation and ability for knowledge sharing in employee networks[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54(6): 1277-1297. [10] Hargadon A., Sutton R. I. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42(4): 716-749. [11] Paulus, P. B., Nijstad B. A. Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration[M]. 2003: Oxford University Press, USA. [12] Seibert S. E., Kraimer M. L, Liden R. C. A social capital theory of career success[J]. Academy of Management Journal. 2001, 44(2): 219-237. [13] Cross R, Cummings J N. Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work[J]. The Academy of Management Journal. 2004, 47(6): 928-937. [14] Barrick, M.R., Mount M. K. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta‐analysis[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1991. 44(1): 1-26. [15] Anderson M. H. Social networks and the cognitive motivation to realize network opportunities: A study of managers' information gathering behaviors[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2008, 29(1): 51-78. [16] Hogan, J. and D.S. Ones, conscientiousness and integrity at work[M]. US: Academic Press. 1997. [17] Switzer, D.P. Network liability: A new frontier for healthcare risk management[J]. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management, 2001, 21(2): 3-13. [18] 黄光国, 胡先缙. 人情与面子: 中国人的权力游戏[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社,2010. Huang Guangguo, Hu Xianjin. Face and favor: The Chinese people's power game[M]. 2010. Beijing: China Renmin University Press. [19] Obstfeld D. Social networks, the tertius lungens orientation, and involvement in innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly. 2005, 50(1):100-130. [20] Scherer K. R. Personality inference from voice quality: The loud voice of extroversion[J]. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1978, 8(4): 467-487. [21] Judge T. A., Heller D., Mount M. K. Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis.[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002, 87(3): 530-541. [22] 姚艳虹, 韩树强. 组织公平与人格特质对员工创新行为的交互影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2013, 10(5): 700-707. Yao Yanhong, Han. A study on relationship between effects of organizational justice and personality traits on employee' innovative behavior[J]. Chinese Journal Management. 2013, 10(5): 700-707. [23] 罗家德. 社会网络分析讲义[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社,2005. Luo Jiade. Social network analysis notes[M]. 2005, Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press. [24] Botwin M. D., Buss D. M. Shackelford T. K. Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction[J]. Journal of Personality, 1997. 65(1): 107-136. [25] 韩翼, 廖建桥, 龙立荣. 雇员工作绩效结构模型构建与实证研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2007, 10(5):62-77. Han Yi, Liao Jianqiao, Long Lirong. Employee job performance structural model building and empirical research[J]. Journal of Management Science in China, 2007, 10(5):62-77. [26] 刘军. 管理研究方法原理与应用[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社,2008. Liu Jun. Principles and applications management research methods[M]. 2008. Beijing: China Renmin University Press. [27] Gargiulo, M., Ertug G., Galunic C. The two faces of control: Network closure and individual performance among knowledge workers[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2009. 54(2): 299-333. [28] Xiao Z, Tsui A S. When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly. 2007, 52(1): 1-31. [29] Lin N. Social capital: A theory of social structure and action[M]. Cambridge Univ Pr, 2002. [30] Rodan S, Galunic C. More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness[J]. Strategic Management Journal. 2004, 25(6): 541-562. [31] Mcfadyen M A, Cannella J A. Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange[J]. The Academy of Management Journal. 2004, 47(5): 735-746.