Comparative analysis of core and emerging technologies between Mainland China and Taiwan based on patent citation network

Science Research Management ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2) : 96-106.

Li Bei, Chen Xiangdong

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Based on the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) utility patents granted to Mainland China during 2000-2012, core technologies and most important emerging technologies of Mainland China are identified by analyzing the patent citation network. The result is compared with the result of Cho & Shih who analyzed the situation of Taiwan. It is proved that though Mainland China and Taiwan are highly similar in core technologies and competitive advantages, they still have much more to cooperate because of the difference in the stage of development of core technologies and the emergence of emerging technologies in both sides of the Taiwan Strait.

Key words

core technology / emerging technology / identification / patent citation network

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Li Bei, Chen Xiangdong. Comparative analysis of core and emerging technologies between Mainland China and Taiwan based on patent citation network[J]. Science Research Management. 2015, 36(2): 96-106

References

[1] 柳晓莹. 国家核心技术竞争力评价指标体系[J]. 国际商务研究, 2008(4): 12-15. LiuXiaoying. Evaluation system of the national core technology competitiveness[J]. Internaional Business Research, 2008, (4): 12-15. [2] George S. Day, Paul J. H.Schoemaker, Robert E. Gunther. Wharton on managing emerging technologies [M]. Wiley, New Jersey, 2000. [3] 赵振元, 银路. 新兴技术对传统管理的挑战和特殊市场开拓思路[J]. 中国软科学, 2004 (7): 72—77. ZhaoZhenyuan, Yin Lu. Challenges of emerging technologies against the traditional managerial mode and a policy for a special market exploitation[J]. China Soft Science, 2004 (7): 72-77. [4] Tessa vander Valk, Ellen H.M. Moors, Marius T.H. Meeus. Conceptualizing patterns in the dynamics of emerging technologies: The case of biotechnology develop ments in the Netherlands[J]. Technovation, 2009, 29(4): 247-264. [5] Perez C,Soete L. Catching up in technology: entry barriers and windows of opportunity [M]. In: Giovanni Dosi, Christopher Freeman, Richard Nelson, et al. Techni cal Change and Economic Theory. Pinter Publishers, London and New York, 1988: 458-479. [6] Trajtenberg M, Henderson R, Jaffe A. University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1997, 5(1): 19-50. [7] 李建蓉. 专利文献与信息[M]. 北京:知识产权出版社, 2002. LiJianrong. Patent literature and information[M]. Beijing: Intellectual Property Publishing House, 2002. [8] Archibugi D, Planta M. Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys[J]. Technovation, 1996, 16(9): 451-519. [9] Ganguli P. Patents and patent information in 1979 and 2004: a perspective from India[J]. World Patent Information, 2004, 26(1): 61-62. [10] Chen D Z, Chang H W, Huang M H, et al. Core technologies and key industries in Taiwan from 1978 to 2002: A perspective from patent analysis[J].Scientometrics, 2005, 64(1): 31-53. [11] Bengisu M. Critical and emerging technologies in materials, manufacturing, and industrial engineering: A study for priority setting[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, 58(3): 473-487. [12] Harhoff D, Scherer F M, Vopel K. Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights[J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(8): 1343-1363. [13] Albert,M.B., Avery,D., Narin,F. et al. Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents[J]. Research Policy, 1991, 20(3):251-259. [14] Wartburg I,Teichert T, Rost K. Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis[J]. Research Policy, 2005, 34(10): 1591-1607. [15] Cho T S, Shih H Y. Patent citation network analysis of core and emerging technologies in Taiwan: 1997–2008[J].Scientometrics, 2011, 89(3): 795-811. [16] 栾春娟, 曾国屏. 基于SNA核心技术领域测度研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2011, 55(6): 33-52. Luan Chunjuan, Zeng Guoping. Research on measurement of core technology domain via SNA[J]. Library and Information Service, 2011, 55(6): 33-52. [17] 沈君, 王续琨, 高继平等. 基于文献计量指标的关键技术的探寻——以第三代移动通信技术为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2011, 30(9):34-40. Shen Jun, Wang Xukun, Gao Jiping, et al. Identification of the key technologies with indicators in bibliometrics-based on the field of third generation mobile communication[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2011, 30 (9): 34-40. [18] 张杰, 刘粉香, 翟东升等. 基于共现网络的核心技术领域识别研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2012, 31(11):35-39. Zhang Jie, Liu Fenxiang, Zhai Dongsheng. Research on identification of the core technical fields based on co-occurrence network[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2012, 31(11): 35-39. [19] Burt R S.Structural holes and good ideas1[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2004, 110(2): 349-399. [20] 刘军. 整体网分析讲义:UCINET软件实用指南[M]. 上海:格致出版社, 2009. Liu Jun. Lectures on whole network approach: A practical guide to UCINET[M]. Shanghai,Truth & Wisdom Press, 2009. [21] World Intellectual Property Organization.World patent report: A statistical review (2008) [EB/OL]. http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/patents/wipo_pub_931.html, 2009/2013-11-15.