To cope with the challenges of increasing evaluation activities, growing evaluation cost, and heavy evaluation requirements, this paper constructs a paper recommendation-propagation platform model which can integrate the efficient acquisition ofacademic literatures, active propagation of research achievements, and automatic evaluation of scientific achievements. After validating the performance of the platform model with computer simulation method, algorithms are also proposed to compute the influence index, quality index, and value index which are used to measure the academic contribution of scientific papers based on users' recommendation-propagation behaviors. The academic evaluation method based on the paper recommendation- propagation platform model can share researchers' review works with others, improve their efficiency, reduce review cost, and make the evaluation results more objective.
Key words
academic evaluation /
collaborative filtering /
peer review /
evaluation index
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 吴建国. 国立科研机构经费使用效益比较研究[J].科研管理,2011,32(5):163-168.Wu J G.Comparative study on the effectiveness of funding for national research institutes [J].Science Research Management,2011,32(5):163-168.
[2] Lutz B.Scientific peer review:an analysis of the peer review process from the perspective of sociology of science theories [J].Human Architecture:Journal of The Sociology of Self-Knowledge,2008,6(2):23-38.
[3] Bruno S F,Katja R.Do rankings reflect research quality [J].Journal of Applied Economics,2010,8(1):1-38.
[4] 蔡琼, 苏丽,丁宇.从行政主导转向国家主导:我国科研评价制度的理性选择[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009,30(9):35-39.Cai Q,Su L,Ding Y.From administration leading to country leading:a rational choice of scientific evaluation system in our country [J].Science of Science and Management of S.& T.,2009,30(9):35-39.
[5] Lawrence S,Aaron L..Citation rates in mathematics a study of variation by subdiscipline [J].Scientometrics,2012,91(3):911-924.
[6] MacRoberts M H,MacRoberts B R.Problems of citation analysis:A study of uncited and seldom-cited influences [J].Journal of The American Society for Information science and Technology,2010,61(1):1-13.
[7] Buschman M,Michalek A.Are alternative metrics still alternative [J].Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2013,39(4):35-39.
[8] 段文奇, 惠淑敏.基于协同过滤的论文推荐-传播平台模型研究[J].科学学研究,2012,30(10):1462-1467.Duan W Q,Hui S M.Scholastic literature recommendation-propagation platform model based on collaborative filtering [J].Studies in Science of Science,2012,30(10):1462-1467.
[9] 常富洋, 林鸿飞,许侃.基于用户向量扩展的协同推荐方法[J].情报学报,2010,29(4):688-694.Chang F Y,Lin H F,Xu K.Collaborating recommendation method based on extended user vector [J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information,2010,29(4):688-694.
[10] 魏建良, 朱庆华.基于社会化标注的个性化推荐研究进展[J].情报学报,2010,29(4):625-633.Wen J L,Zhu Q H.Progress of personalized recommendation studies based on social labels [J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information,2010,29(4):625-633.
[11] 胡昌平, 孙高岭.个性化网络协同推荐服务的扩展及其实现[J].中国图书馆学报,2008,34(177):61-64.Hu C P,Sun G L.Extension and realization of personalized online cooperative recommendation services [J].Journal of Library Science in China,2008,34(177):61-64.
[12] 桑艳艳, 刘培刚,李勇.拟合用户兴趣演变特性的协作过滤推荐算法[J].情报学报,2009,28(1):109-113.Sang Y Y,Liu P G,Li Y.Collaborating filter recommendation algorithm through fitting user interest evolution characteristics [J].Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information,2009,28(1):109-113.
[13] Hwang S Y,Hsiung W C,Yang W S.A prototype WWW literature recommendation system for digital libraries [J].Online Information Review,2003,27(3):169-182.
[14] Hwang S Y,Chuang S M.Combining article content and web usage for literature recommendation in digital libraries [J].Online Information Review,2004,28(4):260-272.
[15] Ding Y,Liu X Z,Guo C,Cronin B.The distribution of references across texts:Some implications for citation analysis [J].Journal of Informetrics,2013,7 (3):583-592.
