Effect of R&D team leader’s goal orientation on team reflexivity and knowledge sharing behavior

Zhang Wenqin, Liu Yun

Science Research Management ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9) : 154-160.

PDF(1 KB)
PDF(1 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9) : 154-160.

Effect of R&D team leader’s goal orientation on team reflexivity and knowledge sharing behavior

  • Zhang Wenqin1, Liu Yun2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Effective teams are important cornerstones of successful organizations engaged in R&D activities, especially for those operating in dynamic environments. Based on the theory of Goal Orientation, the paper proposed a multilevel theoretical model in which the team reflexivity were included to examine the relationship between R&D team leader's goal orientation (LGO) and team member's Knowledge Sharing behavior. This study investigated 118 R&D teams, including 118 team leaders and 605 team members. Empirical results show that the dimensions of LGO have different relation with Knowledge Sharing behavior, and team reflexivity has a partial mediating effect on the relationship. Finally, limitations and suggestions for future research and practice are also discussed.

Key words

leader’s goal orientation / team reflexivity / knowledge sharing behavior / HLM

Cite this article

Download Citations
Zhang Wenqin, Liu Yun. Effect of R&D team leader’s goal orientation on team reflexivity and knowledge sharing behavior[J]. Science Research Management. 2014, 35(9): 154-160

References

[1] Gold, A.H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective[J].Journal of Management Information Systems, 2001, 18: 185-214. [2] Vries RE, Hooff B. & Ridder JA, Explaining knowledge sharing: The role of team communication styles, job satisfaction, and performance beliefs[J].Communication Research, 2006, 33: 115 135. [3] Lee, H., & Choi, B. Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination[J].Journal of Management Information Systems, 2003, 20: 179-288. [4] Yang Jen-Te. Knowledge sharing: Investigating appropriate leadership roles and collaborative culture[J].Tourism Management, 2007, 28: 530 543. [5] Dragoni, Lisa. Understanding the emergence of state goal orientation in organizational work groups: The role of leadership and multilevel climate perceptions[J].Journal of Applied Psychology. 2005, 90: 1084-1095. [6] Dweck, C. S. Motivational processes affecting learning[J].American Psychologist, 1986, 41: 1040-1048. [7] Dweck, C. S. & E. L. Leggett. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality[J]. Psychological Review, 1988, 95: 256-273. [8] Payne, Stephanie C., Youngcourt, Satoris S., & Beaubien, J. Matthew. A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological Net[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92:128-150. [9] West, M. A. Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. In West M A.(Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology[M]. Chichester, England: Wiley, 1996: 555-579. [10] Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory[M]. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs, 1986. [11] Guzzo, R. A., Noonan, K. A., & Elron, E. Expatriate managers and the psychological contract[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994, 79: 617-626. [12] Ford, J. K., Smith, E. M., Weissbein, D. A., Gully, S. M., & Salas, E. Relationships of goal orientation, meta-cognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998, 83:218-233. [13] Dreu, D., Carsten, K. W. Cooperative outcome interdependence, task reflexivity, and team effectiveness: A motivated information processing perspective[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92: 628-638. [14] Hoegl, M., Parboteeah, K. P., Team reflexivity in innovative projects[J].R&D Management, 2006, 36: 113-125. [15] VandeWalle, D. Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument[J].Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1997, 57: 995-1015. [16] 张文勤, 刘云.研发团队反思的结构检验及其对团队效能与效率的影响[J]. 南开管理评论, 2011(3):26-33. [17] 林育理.组织知识活动气候对员工知识活动行为影响之研究:一个跨层次模式的验证[D]. 台湾元智大学博士论文, 2005. [18] 张雷, 雷雳, 郭伯良. 多层线性模型应用[M]. 教育科学出版社, 2005年. [19] Kreft, I. & Leeuw, J.著, 邱皓政译. 多层次模型分析导论[M]. 重庆大学出版社, 2007年. [20] George, J. Personality, Affect, and behavior in groups[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, 75: 107-116. [21] Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical and statistical consideration[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51:1173-1182. [22] Klein, K. J., F. Dansereau & R. J. Hall. Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis[J].Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19:195-229.
PDF(1 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/