Enterprise partner evaluation of generic technology development in strategic emerging industries&mdash;Construction and application of double-dimension and two-phase model

PDF(1 KB)

Science Research Management ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8) : 68-74.

Enterprise partner evaluation of generic technology development in strategic emerging industries—Construction and application of double-dimension and two-phase model

Xiong Yongqing, Bai Yun, Chen Xiaohong

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Focuses on the problem of enterprise partner selection for generic technology development in strategic emerging industries, this paper identifies a cooperative enterprise selection model of double-dimension and two-phase based on the "individual" and "relationship" dimension. Then the "first-round selection" aims to choose some finalist enterprises by using the method based on MCDM and ameliorated multi-objective optimal decision, and the "dynamic adjustment" phase establishes the dynamic screening of enterprises by constructing a cooperation capability-performance matrix model. The cooperative enterprises are divided into "motivated type", "balanced type" and "suspended type". Finally, an example applies the model to verify its rationality and operability, providing a practical approach for enterprise partner selection on strategic emerging industrial generic technology development.

Key words

Strategic emerging industries / generic technology development / enterprise partner / selection model

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Xiong Yongqing, Bai Yun, Chen Xiaohong. Enterprise partner evaluation of generic technology development in strategic emerging industries—Construction and application of double-dimension and two-phase model[J]. Science Research Management. 2014, 35(8): 68-74

References

[1] Gregory Tassey.Standardization in technology-basedmarkets[J].Research Policy,2000,29(4):587-602. [2] 赖丹馨,费方域.公私合作制(PPP)的效率:一个综述[J].经济学家,2010(7):97-104. [3] Seung Ho Park,Gerardo R.Ungson.Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity:A conceptual framework of alliance failure[J].Organization Science,2001,12(1):37-53. [4] Youngbae Kim,Kwanghoe Lee.Technological collaboration in the Korean electronic parts industry:patterns and key success factors[J].R&D Management,2003,33(1):59-77. [5] Sheu Hua Chen,Pei Wen Wang,Chien Min Chen, et al.An analytic hierarchy process approach with linguistic variables for selection of an R&D strategic alliance partner[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering,2010,58(2):278-287. [6] 薛捷,张振刚.国外产业共性技术创新平台建设的经验分析及其对我国的启示[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(12):87-92. [7] 张喆,贾明.PPPs合作中控制权配置实验[J].系统管理学报,2012(2):166-179. [8] Daechang Kang.Optimal contracts of public-private partnerships with demandrisk [J].Seoul Journal of Economics,2012,25(3):255-277. [9] Michael Geringer J.Joint venture partner selection:Strategies for developed countries [J].Business Quarterly,1988(Autumn 1988;53,2):31. [10] 袁磊.战略联盟合作伙伴的选择分析[J].中国软科学,2001(9):54-58. [11] 余泳泽,武鹏,林建兵.价值链视角下的我国高技术产业细分行业研发效率研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010(5):60-65. [12] 王建华,王方华.企业竞争力评价系统及应用研究[J].管理科学学报,2003(2):47-53. [13] 潘安娥,杨青.科技成果转化风险的模糊评价[J].武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版),2004(6):137-140. [14] Kose John,Lubomir Litov,Bernard Yeung.Corporate governance and risk-taking[J].The Journal of Finance,2008,63(4):1679-1728. [15] 解维敏,唐清泉.公司治理与风险承担——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].财经问题研究,2013(1):91-97. [16] 潘琰,胡海全.企业风险承受能力应当如何评价?——指标体系构建与评价方法的探讨[J].福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(1):39-46. [17] 刘家国,赵金楼.基于自我分类的供应链合作伙伴选择模型[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2011(6):835-840. [18] 王燕,谢蕊蕊.物流外包合作伙伴选择的两阶段混合决策方法——基于DEMATEL-ANP-VIKOR混合决策模型[J].中国流通经济,2012(8):30-36. [19] 刘书庆,董雅文.生产型虚拟企业制造合作伙伴选择模型研究[J].中国管理科学,2006(6):77-85. [20] 张学志,史卫.基于技术创新战略的供应链合作伙伴选择[J].科技管理研究,2009(11):290-292. [21] Ashutosh Sarkar,Pratap KJ Mohapatra.Evaluation of supplier capability and performance:A method for supply base reduction[J].Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,2006,12(3):148-163.