The study on the path of improvement in China&rsquo;s regional innovation efficiency from the perspective of innovation value chain

Science Research Management ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5) : 27-37.

The study on the path of improvement in China’s regional innovation efficiency from the perspective of innovation value chain

Yu Yongze¹, Liu Dayong²

Author information +

History +

Abstract

This paper divides the innovation process into knowledge innovation, research and development innovation and product innovation, and uses the three stage DEA model to study the innovative efficiency with the perspective of innovation value chain. This research shows that knowledge innovation efficiency is 0.582, the R&D innovation efficiency is 0.284 and the product innovation efficiency is 0.529. Meanwhile the efficiencies of eastern region are significantly higher than the central and western regions, especially in R&D innovation efficiency. Based on the conclusion above, this paper takes advantage of two-dimensional matrix to classify the regional innovation efficiency into four types for every innovative stage and finds that different regions should choose its appropriate innovation efficiency promotion path according to their own advantages and disadvantages.

Key words

innovation value chain / regional innovation efficiency / path of improvement / three stage DEA Model

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Yu Yongze, Liu Dayong. The study on the path of improvement in China’s regional innovation efficiency from the perspective of innovation value chain[J]. Science Research Management. 2014, 35(5): 27-37

References

[1] 史修松,赵曙东,吴福象. 中国区域创新效率及其空间差异研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2009(3):45-52. [2] 刘顺忠,官建成. 区域创新系统创新绩效的评价[J]. 中国管理科学,2002(01):75-81. [3] 余泳泽. 要素集聚、政府支持与科技创新效率[J]. 经济评论,2011(02):93-98. [4] 白俊红,江可申,李婧. 中国区域创新效率的收敛性分析[J]. 财贸经济,2008(09):119-124. [5] 白俊红,蒋伏心. 考虑环境因素的区域创新效率研究---基于三阶段DEA方法[J]. 财贸经济,2011(10):104-110. [6] 陈劲,陈钰芬. 企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2006(03):86-92. [7] 庞瑞芝,李鹏. 中国工业创新:过程、效率与模式--基于2001-2008年大中型工业企业的数据[J]. 产业经济研究,2011(02):1-8. [8] 余泳泽. 我国高技术产业技术创新效率及其影响因素研究--基于价值链视角下的两阶段分析[J]. 经济科学,2009(4):62-74. [9] 余泳泽. 政府支持、制度环境、FDI与我国区域创新体系建设[J]. 产业经济研究,2011(02):47-52. [10] Hansen, M.T., and Birkinshaw,J. The innovation value chain[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2007, 85(6):121-135. [11] Sherer, S. From supply-chain management to value network advocacy: implications for e-supply chains[J]. Supply chain management. 2005 (10): 77-83. [12] Kramer M R. Creating shared value[J]. Harvard business review. 2011 (89): 62-77. [13] Lee J, Gereffi G, Beauvais J. Global value chains and agrifood standards: Challenges and possibilities for smallholders in developing countries[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012, 109(31): 12326-12331. [14] Batz, J. Predicting technology adoption to improve research priority setting[J]. Agricultural economics. 2003(28): 151-164. [15] Hansen, E. Introduction to the special issue on innovation and entrepreneurship in the forest sector[J]. Forest Policy and Economics. 2006(8): 669-673. [16] Comin, D. A new approach to measuring technology with an application to the shape of the diffusion curves[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2008 (33): 187-207. [17] Ghebremichael A, Potter-Witter K. Effects of tax incentives on long-run capital formation and total factor productivity growth in the Canadian sawmilling industry[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2009, 11(2): 85-94. [18] Fried, H.O.,Lovell,C.A.K,S.Schmidt and,S.Yaisawarng. Accounting for environment effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis,2002,17:157-174. [19] 牛泽东,张倩肖. FDI创新溢出与门槛效应--基于非线性面板平滑转换回归模型的分析[J]. 产业经济研究,2011(06):52-59. [20] 陈钊,陆铭,金煜. 中国人力资本和教育发展的区域差异:对于面板数据的估算[J].世界经济, 2004(12):25-31. [21] Nasierow, S., and F.J.,Arcelus. On the efficiency of national innovation systems[J]. Socioeconomic Planning Sciences, 2003,37 (3):215.