Theoretical extension of evaluation theory tree based on mapping knowledge domain

PDF(1 KB)

Science Research Management ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5) : 128-137.

Li Qiang¹, Wang Xiaomei², Han Tao²

Author information +

History +

Abstract

This study constructed the mapping knowledge domain of evaluation research area and expanded Alkin's evaluation theory tree based onleading academics and citation analysis of their journal publications. The expanded evaluation theory tree characterized better relationship between research front, research area and the researchers,and it also demonstrated the evolution of hot themes in evaluation research. Compared with the subjective methods of interviewing, personal summarizing and so on, this study provided objective methods and data in sociological research and can be a paradigm for reference.

Key words

leading academics / evaluation theory / cluster analysis / mapping knowledge domain

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Li Qiang, Wang Xiaomei, Han Tao. Theoretical extension of evaluation theory tree based on mapping knowledge domain[J]. Science Research Management. 2014, 35(5): 128-137

References

[1] Ernest R.House.Assumptions underlying evaluation models[J].EducationalResearcher,1978,7(8):4-12. [2] Janice E.Williams.A Numerically Developed Taxonomy of Evaluation Theory and Practice[J].Evaluation Review,1989,13(1):18-31. [3] Marvin C.Alkin.Evaluation roots:tracing theoristsviews and influences[M].Sage Publications,Incorporated,2004:13-14. [4] Stewart I.Donaldson.& Tarek A.Azzam.Tending the garden of evaluation theory:Flourishing trees and Ph.D.s.In Vo,A.& Christie,C.A.,Evaluation Use & Decision Making[M].Greenwich,CT:Information Age (In Press). [5] Anne E.Heberger,Christina A.Christie,and Marvin C.Alkin.A Bibliometric Analysis of theAcademic Influences of and onEvaluation Theorists' PublishedWorks[J].2010,31(1):24-44. [6] LeoEgghe& Ronald Rousseau.Introduction to Informetrics:quantitative methods in library,documentation and information science[M].1990 Elsevier Science Publishers,1990. [7] 潘教峰等.科学结构地图2012[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2013:4-6. [8] Tim T Robinson,J Bradley Cousins.Internal participatory evaluation as an organizational learning system:A longitudinal case study[J].Studies in Educational Evaluation,2004,30(1):1-22. [9] Eleanor Chelimsky.Program Evaluation and Appropriate Governmental Change[J].Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science,1983,466(1):103-118. [10] Eleanor Chelimsky.The role of experience in formulating theories of evaluation practice[J].American Journal of Evaluation,1998,19(1):35-55. [11] Leonard Bickman.Implications of a children's mental health managed care demonstration evaluation[J].Journal of Behavioral Health Services Research,1996,23(1):107-117. [12] E.Warren Lambert,Ann Doucette,Leonard Bickman.Measuring mental health outcomes with pre-post designs[J].Journal of Behavioral Health ServicesResearch,2001,28(3):273-286. [13] Huey-Tsyh Chen,Peter H.Rossi.Evaluating With Sense:The Theory-Driven Approach[J].Evaluation Review,1983,7(3):283-302. [14] Huey-Tsyh Chen,Peter H.Rossi.Issues in the theory-driven perspective[J].Evaluation and Program Planning,1989,12(4):299-306. [15] Donald T.Campbell.Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings[J].Psychological Bulletin,1957,54:297-312. [16] Donald T.Campbell.Methods for the experimenting society[J].Evaluation Practice,1991,12(3):223-260. [17] Huey-Tsyh Chen.The conceptual framework of the theory-driven perspective[J].Evaluation and Program Planning,1989,12(4):391-396. [18] Jennifer G.Greene.Stakeholder Participation and Utilization in Program Evaluation[J].Evaluation Review,1988,12(2):91-116. [19] Jori N.Hall,Jeehae Ahn,Jennifer C.Greene.Values Engagement in Evaluation;Ideas,Illustrations,and Implications[J].American Journal of Evaluation,2012,33(2):195-207. [20] Michael Scriven.New frontiers of evaluation[J].Evaluation Practice,1986,7(1):7-44. [21] Michael Scriven.Pros and Cons about Goal-Free Evaluation[J].American Journal of Evaluation,1991,12(1):55-62. [22] Ernest R.House,Sandra Mathison.Methodology and Values in Evaluation[J].Educational Theory,1984,34(2):151-152. [23] Ernest R.House.The future perfect of evaluation[J].Evaluation Practice,1994,15(3):239-247. [24] Fred Carden,Marvin C.Alkin.Evaluation Roots:An International Perspective[J].Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation,2012,8(17):102-118.