Measurement method and application research on surrounding patents

Zhang Mier, Meng Shanshan, Tian Ying

Science Research Management ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3) : 155-160.

Science Research Management ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3) : 155-160.

Measurement method and application research on surrounding patents

  • Zhang Mier, Meng Shanshan, Tian Ying
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Patents are gradually evolving from protective methods into competitive tools, which results in the springing up of surrounding patents and forming of patent bubbles. Surrounding patents have made much trouble to patent management and its scientific evaluation. It has become an urgent task to construct effective measurement method and to screen out surrounding patents from the massive data. The generation mechanism and basic data of surrounding patents have been analyzed. The measurement method is proposed and an index of surrounding patents is developed based on the differences of typical patent families. Taking Apple Inc. as the research sample, the method has been used to measure and analyze surrounding patents.

Key words

surrounding patent / patent bubble / measurement method / patent family

Cite this article

Download Citations
Zhang Mier, Meng Shanshan, Tian Ying. Measurement method and application research on surrounding patents[J]. Science Research Management. 2014, 35(3): 155-160

References

[1] Schneider C. Fences and Competition in Patent Races[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2008, 26(6):1348-1364. [2] Kihara Y. Pro-Patent Policy: A Review of the Last 20 Years [J]. CASRIP Newsletter, 2000:11-16. [3] Jonathan M. Patent Inflation [J].The Yale Law Journal, 2011, 9(20):470-531. [4] Cohen W M, Nelson R R, Walsh J P. Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or not) [R].NBER Working Paper No. 7552, 2000. [5] Wagner P R, Parchomovsky G. Patent Portfolios [R]. Pennsylvania: School of Law and University of Pennsylvania, 2004. [6] Ludmila S. Patents and Corporate Value Creation: Theoretical Approach [J].Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2007, 8(3):431-443. [7] Grimpe C, Hussinger K. Building and Blocking: The Two Faces of Technology Acquisition [R]. ZEW Discussion Papers, No. 08-042, 2009. [8] Blind K, Cremers K, M ller E. The Influence of Strategic Patenting on Companies' Patent Portfolios [J].Research Policy, 2009, 38(2):428-436. [9] Heeley M B, Matusik S F, Jain N. Innovation, Appropriability, and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(1):209-225. [10] Lemley M A, Shapiro C. Probabilistic Patents [J].The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2005, 19 (2): 75-98. [11] Kohler F, Blind K. Claim Amendments as the Result of Strategic Patenting and as a Driver for Patent Value [R]. Imperial College London Business School, 2010. [12] Noel M D, Schankerman M A. Strategic Patenting and Software Innovation [R].CEP Discussion Paper No. 740, 2006. [13] 张米尔,冯永琴.标准联盟的兴起及诱发技术垄断的机制研究[J].科学学研究,2010,28(5):690- 696.Zhang Mier, Feng Yongqin. The Rising of Standard Alliances and Mechanisms of Technical Monopoly Induced by Standard Alliances[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2010, 28(5): 690-696. [14] FTC. To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy [R]. Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C. 2003. [15] Heller M A, Eisenberg R S. Can Patents Deter Innovations? The Anti-commons in Biomedical Research [J].Science, 1998, 280(1):698-701. [16] 马大明,杜晓君,宋宝全等.专利丛林问题研究——产生与发展、经济影响及度量[J].产业经济评论,2012,11(1):18-34.Ma Daming, Du Xiaojun, Song Baoquan, et al. Research on Patent Thicket——Emergence and Development, Economic Effect, and Measurement [J].Review of Industrial Economics, 2012, 11(1): 18-34. [17] 和育东."专利丛林"问题和美国专利政策的转折[J].知识产权,2008,18(103):92-97.He Yudong. Patent Thicket and Change of American Patent Policy[J].Intellectual Property, 2008,18 (103):92-97. [18] Bruno V P. Lost Property: The European Patent System and Why It Doesn't Work [M]. Belgium: Bruegel, 2009:23-24 . [19] Giuri P, Mariani M, et al. Inventors and Invention Processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU Survey [J]. Research Policy, 2007, 36(10):1107-1127. [20] Kazuyuki M. Licensing or Not Licensing? : An Empirical Analysis of the Strategic Use of Patents by Japanese Firms [J].Research Policy, 2008, 37(10):1548-1555. [21] Ziedonis R H. Don't Fence Me In: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms [J]. Management Science, 2004, 50 (6):804-820. [22] 万小丽,朱雪忠.国际视野下专利质量指标研究的现状与趋势[J].情报杂志,2009,28(7):49-54.Wan Xiaoli, Zhu Xuezhong. Status and Trends of Patent Quality Indicator Research in International Perspective[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2009, 28(7):49-54. [23] Glossary of Terms Concerning Industrial Property Information and Documentation [R].WIPO, 2012.8. [24] Huimin M, Hernandez J A. Price Skimming on a Successful Marketing Strategy: Study of Ipad Launching as Apple's Innovative Product[A].Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Innovation & Management [C].Japan, 2011:389-393. [25] Geradin D. Ten Years of DG Competition Effort to Provide Guidance on the Application of Competition Rules to the Licensing of Standard-Essential Patents: Where Do We Stand? [R]. George Mason University School of Law, 2013.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/