User-introduced triple helix innovation system model-A research based on social network

Abstract

Abstract: Triple helix innovation system model proposed by Etzkowitz and laydesdorff is regarded as an important foundation heory for national innovation system t, but it is lack of attention to an important role in social innovation - "user" and in time of need to improve. Based on the "user" aggregation platform-Online Social Network, this paper embedded the "Online Social Network" element into the triple helix model, described the running process and mechanism of the social networking triple helix model, presented the innovative metering algorithm of the improved model and achieved a clear definition and measurement of the "user" role in the theory of national innovation.

Key words: triple helix model, social network, innovation, user

CLC Number:

F204

Feng Chujian, Jiang Yanhui. User-introduced triple helix innovation system model-A research based on social network[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(11): 84-91.

References

[1] Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. The triple helix of university-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge-based economic development[J]. EASST Review, 1995,14(1):14-19. [2] Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and 'Mode 2' to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations[J]. Research Policy, 2000,29:109-123. [3] 王成军.官产学三重螺旋创新系统模型研究[J].科学学研究,2006(2): 315-320.WANG Chengjun.Researches on triple helix innovation system of university-industry-government partnerships[J].Studies in Science of Science,2006,24(02):315-320. [4] Butler, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S. and Kraut, R. Community effort in online groups: Who does the work and why?[C]//S. Weisbandand L. Atwater(Eds.). Leadership at a Distance.Mahwa, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers,2003. [5] Cachia, R., Compa?ó, R. and Da Costa, O. Grasping the potential of online social networks for foresight[J].Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2007,74(8):1179-1203. [6] Leydesdorff L, Etzkowit H. Is there a fourth helix?[J]. science and public policy, 2003,30(1): 55-61. [7] 周春彦,[美]亨利.埃茨科威兹. 双三螺旋:创新与可持续发展[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2006(8): 170-175. ZHOU Chunyan,Henry Etzkowitz.Triple helix twins:innovation and sustainability[J].Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science),2006,08(03):170-175. [8] 王成军.中外三重螺旋计量比较研究[J].科研管理,2006(6):19-27.WANG Chengjun.Comparative researches on measurement-based triple helix of university-industry-government partnerships[J].Science Research Management,2006,27(06):19-27. [9] Santonen, T., Defining a mass customization strategy for online banking[J]. international journal of Mass Customization, 2007, 6(1-2):95-113. [10] Santonen, T., Kaivo-oja, J. and Suomala, J. Introduction to national open innovation system (nois) paradigm: A preliminary concept for interchange[R]. FFRC (Finland Futures Research Centre)eBooks,Turku School of Economics,2007,(7):176-192. [11] 杜兰英, 陈鑫. 政产学研用协同创新机理与模式研究--以中小企业为例[J]. 科技进步与对策,2012,29(22):103-107.Du Lanying,Chen Xin.Study on scientific research collaborative innovation mechanism and pattern-An example of small and medium enterprises[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2012,29(22):103-107. [12] 满海雁, 陈明. 论政府在"政产学研金介"战略联盟中的角色定位与功效发挥[J]. 科技管理研究, 2011(11):17-20.ManHaiyan, Chen Ming.Discussion of the role and the contribution of the government in "Government-industry-university-research-finance-intermediary" strategic alliance[J].Science and Technology Management Research,2011,(11):17-20. [13] Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: theproblem of embeddedness[J].The American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91(3):481-510.

[1]	Luo Jinlian, Wang Xianglu, Geng Xin. Research on the nonlinear impact of digital transformation on innovation output of enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(8): 1-10.
[2]	Lyu Kefu, Yu Mingyang, Ruan Yongping. Digital transformation and resource allocation efficiency of enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(8): 11-20.
[3]	Ai Dezhou. Embedment of governance chain: The vertical deepening of participatory policy innovation [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(8): 40-46.
[4]	Li Qingxue, Qi Tianyi, Wang Lijing, Liu Dejia. Research on the evolutionary logic and driving mechanism of the service innovation and transformation of advanced manufacturers: A study from the perspective of the resources and capacities of enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(8): 47-56.
[5]	An Suxia, Liu Laihui, Wang Lei. Customer earnings performance and financing constraints of enterprise innovation [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(8): 89-99.
[6]	Liu Weiwei, Jin Yingzhe, Bi Kexin. Multidimensional proximity, innovation openness and cooperative innovation performance: A study from the perspective of network evolution [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(8): 162-172.
[7]	Ma Zenglin, Yu Jingting, Wang Lei. The double-edged sword effect of telecommuting on the telecommuters′ innovation performance [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(8): 173-182.
[8]	Zhao Fuqiang, Hu Wei, Chen Yun, Zhang Qiuhong. Integrating and sharing human resource practice and individual innovation performance:The role of knowledge exchange and goal orientation [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(8): 183-192.
[9]	Yang Peipei, Liu Xielin. An analysis of the implementation mechanism of the Middle- and Long-Term Plan for Science and Technology from the perspective of institutional logics [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(8): 119-128.
[10]	. The construction of the user-driven innovation ecosystem of megaprojects [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(7): 32-40.
[11]	Cheng Qiongwen, Zhao Yixuan. Research on the configuration path of knowledge fusion in the innovation ecosystem [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(7): 41-49.
[12]	Shi Fengguang, Zhou Ming, Xu Bin. Dynamic spatial measurement of the production of China′s industry with green collaborative innovation [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(7): 60-72.
[13]	Zhu Dongbo, Zhang Xiangwei. Has digital finance promoted the upgrading of industrial structure through technological innovation? [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(7): 73-82.
[14]	Kang Yanling, Wang Man, Chen Kejing. Can science and technology finance promote high-quality development of enterprises? [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(7): 83-96.
[15]	Ma Qian, Ren Xiaosong, Zhang Hongbing, Zhao Guohao. Carbon trading policy, R&D innovation and carbon performance of polluting enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(7): 114-123.