Effect of agency conflicts on the innovation of listed companies in China

Lv Xinjun

Science Research Management ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11) : 60-67.

PDF(1 KB)
PDF(1 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (11) : 60-67.

Effect of agency conflicts on the innovation of listed companies in China

  • Lv Xinjun
Author information +
History +

Abstract

This paper estimates innovation efficiency of China's listed companies by constructing the heteroscedastic stochastic frontier model, and analyzes the impact of agency conflict on efficiency. The results show that: (1) the innovation efficiency of China's listed companies declines by 25%-45% due to agency conflicts; (2) Improvement of equity concentration and balance degree and implementation of executive incentive policy will significantly reduce the level of agency conflicts, and enhance investment in innovation; institutional ownership is not a key factor of technological innovation;(3) Innovation efficiency of state-controlled companies shows a steadily increasing trend and gradually higher than the non-state-owned listed companies during the sample period.

Key words

innovation efficiency / innovation constraints / agency conflicts / stochastic frontier model

Cite this article

Download Citations
Lv Xinjun. Effect of agency conflicts on the innovation of listed companies in China[J]. Science Research Management. 2014, 35(11): 60-67

References

[1] 冯根福,温军. 中国上市公司治理与企业技术创新关系的实证分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2008(7):91-101. [2] Wright et al. Impactof corporate insider, block holder and institutional equity ownership on firm risk taking[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39:441-458. [3] Jensen, M., Meckling, W. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976,3: 305-360. [4] Wiseman, R. M., Gomez Mejia, L. A. Behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998,23:133-153. [5] 李春涛,宋敏. 中国制造业企业的创新活动:所有制和CEO激励的作用[J]. 经济研究, 2010(5):55-67. [6] 刘胜强,刘星. 上市公司负债水平对企业R&D投资的影响[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2011(11):87-90. [7] 项本武. 中国工业行业技术创新效率研究[J]. 科研管理, 2011(1):10-14. [8] Charness, A.,W.W. Cooper, and E.Rhodes. Measuring the efficiency of decision makingunits[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978,2:429-444. [9] Aligner D.J., C.A.K. Lovell and P. Schmidt. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier function models[J]. Journal of Econometrics,1977,6:21-37. [10] Hansen, G. S.and Hill, C.W.L. Are institutional investments myopic? A time- series study of four technology-driven industries[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1991(12):1-16. [11] Kochhar, R., David, P. Institutional investments and firm innovation: A test of competing hypothesis[J].Strategic Management Journal, 1996,17:73-84. [12] Parthiban David, Michael A. Hu, Javier Gimeno. The influence of activism by institutional investments on R&D[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44:144-157. [13] 王燕妮. 高管激励对研发投入的影响研究——基于我国制造业上市公司的实证分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2011(7):1071-1078. [14] Shleifer, A, Vishny, R. A survey of corporate governance[J]. Journal of Finance, 1997,52:737-783. [15] 杨建君, 盛锁. 股权结构对企业技术创新投入影响的实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2007(25):787-792. [16] 任海云. 股权结构与企业R&D投入关系的实证研究--基于A股制造业上市公司的数据分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2010(5):126-135. [17] Atkinson, A.B. Stiglitz, J.E. Lectures on public economics[M]. McGraw-Hill,London,1980.
PDF(1 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/