A Study on Research Integrity Evaluation Mechanism Based on Factor Analysis Method

Abstract

Abstract: Currently the research integrity has become a hot topic which draws the academic research and the social attention. Firstly, the concept and connotation of the research integrity are presented in this article, and then the related factors of research misconduct are analyzed based on the factor analysis method. The result analysis proposes some causes and corresponding countermeasures for the research integrity, pointing out that the research integrity is closely related to the scientific evaluation.

Key words: research integrity, research misconduct, factor analysis, countermeasures

CLC Number:

G304

Xia Wenli. A Study on Research Integrity Evaluation Mechanism Based on Factor Analysis Method[J]. Science Research Management, 2013, 34(10): 118-121,137.

[1]	Wang Anyi, Hu Liyun. Historical development and countermeasures of scientific research integrity norms of the Chinese government [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(9): 10-16.
[2]	Yu Xiang, Zhang Runzhe, Zhang Ben, Wang Hua. A study of the intellectual property regime adapted to the rapid development of artificial intelligence [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(8): 176-183.
[3]	Wang Chenggang， Shi Chunsheng. A research on the effect mechanism of organizational culture on organizational innovation [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(7): 78-84.
[4]	Zhu Minghao1, Dou Shuihai1, Jia Ji2. An analysis of the effects of technological innovation policies on China’s auto industry [J]. Science Research Management, 2017, 38(7): 26-36.
[5]	Pang Jiantao, Wen Ke. Effect and mechanism of proactive personality on employee innovative behavior [J]. Science Research Management, 2017, 38(1): 12-20.
[6]	Yu Zipeng, Wang Jinzhao. An empirical analysis on the influence factors of enterprise technological innovation choice in China [J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(7): 49-55.
[7]	Wang Xiaomeng. An empirical study on performance evaluation of regional technology innovation policy—Based on perspective analysis of correlation and grey correlation [J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(5): 38-43.
[8]	Lin Chunpei, Zhang Zhengang. An empiricalresearch on the componentsand structure of enterprise absorptive capacityfrom the perspective ofprocess [J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(2): 25-34.
[9]	Zhu Ying. The classification of foreign R&D institutions based on factor analysis [J]. Science Research Management, 2013, 34(1): 147-153.
[10]	Liu Yang, Wen Ke, Guo Jian. The determinants analysis on Chinese patent quality based on the process management [J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(12): 104-109,141.
[11]	SUN Rui, WANG Tong-Xun, REN Wen-Shuo. Regional implementation of strategy of reinvigorating China through talent development [J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(4): 113-119.
[12]	Ning Lianju， Li Meng . Evaluation model for large and medium-sized industrial enterprises’ technological innovation capability based on factor analysis method [J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(3): 51-58 .
[13]	Xie Peihong, Xi Hongmei, Wei Nongjian, Liu Xia. The B2C E-commerce customer satisfaction duringthe period of China’s economic transition [J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(10): 109-117.
[14]	Chen Feiqiong, Ren Sen . The dominant factors of innovation resource integration: A case study based on Zhejiang province [J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(1): 89-96 .
[15]	Chen Guodong1, Xia Huosong2 . Models and positive research on local university teachers’ knowledge diffusion [J]. Science Research Management, 2010, 31(5): 178-184 .

A Study on Research Integrity Evaluation Mechanism Based on Factor Analysis Method

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics