The analysis and evaluation of the implementation results and impacts of the S&T policies have great significance in enabling the government to improve such policies. The paper has collected China's 454 policies issued by the central government most relating to the industrial innovation and studies the relationship between the innovation performance and the power and stability of policy based on the C-D production function by using the 2000-2009 industry panel data. The research results reveal that the power of the innovation policy had a positive effect only on the technological performance but not on the economic performance. The instability of policy has negative effect on the motivation of the policies on the technological performance. The policy has a lag effect on the performance. Moreover, by studying the relationship between different policy instruments and the innovation performance, it is found that the supplying policy has a positive effect on the technological performance, and environment policy has a positive effect on the technological and economic performance, and the demanding policy has a positive effect on the economic performance. Finally, the paper suggests that government should pay more attention to the demanding policy and improve the innovation policy system, etc.
Key words
power of policy /
stability of policy /
instruments of policy /
innovation performance
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] Liu Fengchao(刘凤朝),Sun Yutao(孙玉涛).我国科技政策向创新政策演变的过程、趋势与建议[J]. China Soft Science(中国软科学),2007(5):34-42.
[2] Ewald Rametsteiner, Gerhard Weiss.Assessing Policies from a Systems Perspective—Experiences with Applied Innovation Systems Analysis and Implications for Policy Evaluation[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2006 (8): 564-576.
[3] Zhao Xiaoyuan(赵筱媛),Su Jun(苏竣). 基于政策工具的公共科技政策分析框架研究[J]. Studies in Science of Science(科学学研究),2007(1):52-56.
[4] Gray, A., Libecap, D.Economic variables and law development: A case of western mineral property[J].Economic History Journal, 1978, 38(2): 338－362.
[5] Sylvie D murger and others.地理位置与优惠政策对中国地区经济发展的相关贡献[J]. Economics Research(经济研究),2002(9):14-23,92.
[6] Lanoie, P., Laurent, L. J., Johnstone, N., et al. Environment Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Proter Hypothesie [Z]. CIRANO Working Papers, 2007, 19: 1-34.
[7] Yin Huafang(殷华方),Pan Zhen(潘镇),Lu Minghong(鲁明泓).中国外商直接投资产业政策测量和有效性研究: 1979-2003[J]. Management World(管理世界),2006(7):34-45,171,172.
[8] Peng Jisheng(彭纪生),Sun Wenxiang(孙文祥),Zhong Weiguo(仲为国). 中国技术创新政策演变与绩效实证研究[J].Science Research Management(科研管理),2008(4):140-145.
[9] Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth[J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1979, 10 (1):92-116.
[10] Jaffe A B. Real affects of academic research[J]. American Economic Review,1986,79:957-970.
[11] Zhou Ming(周明),Li Zongzhi(李宗植). 基于产业集聚的高技术产业创新能力研究[J]. Science Research Management(科研管理),2011(1):15-21,28.
[12] Gu Xiaomin(顾晓敏).促进创新政策,要防"挤出效应"[N].Wenhui Newspaper(文汇报),2011,2,14.
PDF(1 KB)
