The impact of relational behavior between enterprises on innovation flexibility

Song Hua, Wang Lan

Science Research Management ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3) : 1-10,17.

PDF(1788 KB)
PDF(1788 KB)
Science Research Management ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3) : 1-10,17.

The impact of relational behavior between enterprises on innovation flexibility

  • Song Hua1, Wang Lan2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Based on resource dependency theory and contingency theory, how various types of tie portfolios, i.e., exploratory and exploitative relationship could be beneficial to innovation flexibility is examined. Environmental competitiveness and dynamics are combined as moderators, for the how the extraneous environmental conditions have influence on the efficiency of exploratory relationship and exploitative relationship is explored. By using survey data collected from a sample of 194 firms in mainland China, it is demonstrated that exploratory and exploitative relationship are both positively related to the firms innovation flexibility. It is also found that the positive relationship between them is moderated by the level of competitiveness and dynamics in their environments. Environment dynamics positively moderates the relationship between exploratory relationship and innovation flexibility. Environment competitiveness negatively moderates the relationship between exploratory relationship and innovation flexibility; on the contrary, it positively moderates the relationship between exploitative relationship and innovation flexibility. The result means that with an increase of competitiveness, firms will employ less exploratory relationship but more exploitative relationship to enhance innovation flexibility. With an increase of dynamics, firms will employ more exploratory relationship to enhance innovation flexibility.

Key words

exploratory relationship / exploitative relationship / innovation flexibility / environment competitiveness / environment dynamics

Cite this article

Download Citations
Song Hua, Wang Lan. The impact of relational behavior between enterprises on innovation flexibility[J]. Science Research Management. 2012, 33(3): 1-10,17

References

[1] March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science 1991, 2(1):71-87. [2] Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28: 238-256. [3] Burgelman, R. A. Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1994, 39: 24-56. [4] Stuart T. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43(3): 668-698. [5] Slater S F, Narver J C. Market organization and the learning organization [J]. J Mark 1995, 59: 63-74. [6] Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42: 1-34. [7] Lavie, D. & Rosenkopf, L. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(4): 797-818. [8] Vickery, S., Calantone, R. and Dröge, C. Supply chain flexibility: an empirical study [J]. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 1999, 35 (1): 16-24. [9] Stuart T. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998, 43(3): 668-698. [10] Joao Mota, Luis M. de Castro, Relationship portfolios andcapability development:Cases from the moulds industry [J]. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management. 2005,11: 42-54 [11] Araujo, L., Easton, G., Strategy: where is the pattern? [J]. Organization science. 1996, 3 (3): 361-383. [12] 李永峰, 司春林. 合作创新战略联盟中企业间相互信任问题的实证研究[J]. 研究发展与管理.2007, 19(6): 52-60 [13] Danny, P. C., Geoffrey, H., & Onno, O. The determinants of relational governance and performance: How to manage business relationships? [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2003, 32: 703-716 [14] Henderson R, Clark K. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990, 35: 9-30. [15] Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms [J]. Organization Science, 1992, 3(2): 179-202. [16] 林筠, 杨雪, 李随成. 隐性知识交流和转移与企业技术创新关系的实证研究[J].科研管理,2008(5). [17] Matusik, S., & Hill, C. The utilization of contingent work, knowledge creation and competitive advantage [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23 (4): 680-98. [18] Miller, D. & Friesen, P. H. Strategy-Making and Environment: The Third Link [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1983, 4: 221. [19] Dess, G.G., & Beard, D.W. Dimensions of organizational task environments [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1984, 29: 52-73. [20] Jansen, J. J. P., F. A. J. Van Den Bosch, H. W. Volberda. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter? [J] Academy. Management Journal. 2005, 48 999-1015. [21] Lumpkin, G. T., G. G. Dess. Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle [J]. Journal of Business Venturing. 2001,16: 429-451. [22] Narasimhan, R. and Das, A. Manufacturing agility and supply chain management practices [J]. Production and Inventory Management, 1999, 40(1):4-11. [23] Jansen, J.J.P., Van den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W. Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators [J]. November 2006, Management Science, 52(11):1661-1674 [24] Rothaermel, F.T., & Deeds, D.L. 2004. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3): 201-221. [25] Bengtsson, Maria; S?lvell, ?rjan, Climate of Competition: Clusters and Innovative Performance. Scandinavian Journal of Management[J], 2004, 20(3): 225-244 [26] Claro Pimentel. D., G. Hagelaar and O. Omta. The determinants of relational governance and performance: How to manage business relationships [J]. Industrial Marketing Management. 2003, 32:703-716 [27] Achrol, R.S., Stern, L.W., Environment Determinants of Decision-Making Uncertainty in Marketing Channels [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1988, 25: 36-50. [28] Rowley, T., Behrens, D. & Krackhardt, D. Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(3): 369-386. [29] DeWitt T., Giunipero C.L., & Melton L. H. Clusters and supply chain management: the Amish experience [J]. International Journal of Physical, 2006, 35(4): 289-308.
PDF(1788 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/