By using Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA), the indigenous innovation efficiency changes and decomposition of Chinese high-tech industry are measured, and the spillover effect of FDI quantity and technological quantity is verified by groups based on ownership structure. The results show that (1) The innovation efficiency changes of private sectors grow faster than that for state-owned enterprises and growing source is significantly different. The indigenous innovation efficiency changes for private sectors mainly come from the rapid growth of technological exchange and allocation efficiency changes, while the changes for state-owned enterprises are mainly due to the ascension of technical efficiency and scale efficiency. (2)Both of foreign quality features and ownership structures are important factors affecting technology spillovers. Technology content and profitability have the positive influence on FDI spillover while average scale of FDI has the negative influence on FDI spillover, although these influences only have significant on state-owned enterprises. The localization of FDI becomes the only foreign quality feature which has the significant positive spillover affect on private sectors. (3) The interaction between quantity and quality features of FDI possesses the significant difference in different departments.
Key words
FDI quality /
SFA /
system-GMM /
enterprise ownership /
indigenous innovation efficiency
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 赵国庆,张中元. FDI溢出效应、创新活动与技术进步—基于中国高技术产业的实证分析[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2008(11):25-30.
[2] Liu,X. and Buck,T. Innovation Performance and Channels for International Technology Spillovers; Evidence from Chinese High-tech Industries[J]. Research Policy, 2007,36(3):355-366.
[3] 蒋殿春,张宇.行业特征与外商直接投资的技术溢出效应:基于高新技术产业的经验分析[J]世界经济, 2006(10):21-30.
[4] 邓路,高连水. FDI强度与自主创新效率—基于我国高技术产业的面板数据[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2009(4): 20-24.
[5] 张海洋. R&D两面性、外资活动与中国工业生产率增长[J].经济研究,2005(5): 107-117.
[6] 陈琳,林珏. 外商直接投资对中国制造业企业的溢出效应,基于企业所有制结构的视角[J]. 管理世界,2009(9):24-33.
[7] 田泽永,江可申,江宏. FDI溢出效应对民营经济的影响—基于省际面板数据的实证研究[J].研究与发展管理, 2010(1):10-17.
[8] Assanie, N. and Singleton, B. The Quality of Foreign Direct Investment: Does it Matter for Economic Growth? . Working Paper ,2001.
[9] Fortanier, F. Foreign Direct Investment and Host Country Economic Growth: Does the Investor s Country of Origin Play a Role?[J] Transnational Corporations,2007,16(2): 41-76.
[10] 孟亮, 宣国良.不同来源FDI在华技术溢出效应实证研究[J].科研管理, 2005(9): 115-120.
[11] 王成岐,张嫚.外商直接投资对中国制造业内资企业绩效的影响[J].世界经济,2005(9):17-27.
[12] 傅元海,唐未兵,王展祥. FDI溢出机制、技术进步路径与经济增长绩效[J].经济研究,2010(6):92-104.
[13] 黄亚生著.钱勇,王润亮译. 改革时期的外国直接投资[M].新星出版社,北京,2005.
[14] Battese G.E. and T.J Coello. Frontier production functions ,Technical Efficiency and Panel Data:With Application to Paddy Farmers in Indian[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis,1992(2):153-169.
[15] Kumbhakar S.C . Estimation and Decomposition of Productivity Change when production is not Efficient: A Panel Data Approch[J]. Economic Review,2000(19):425-460.
[16] 张军,陈诗一,Gary H.Jefferson. 结构改革与中国工业增长[J]. 经济研究,2009(7):4-20.
[17] Kumar, N. Quality of flows as important as magnitude:http://fe columnists . Express india. com/full_column. php?content_id=107501.2005,Nov 03,Thursday.
[18] Laura Alfaro, Andrew Charlton. Growth and the Quality of Foreign Direct Investment:Is All FDI Equal? . Harvard Working Paper,2007.
PDF(994 KB)
