Concept extension and case study of market distance toward 

R&D personnel performance appraisal

Science Research Management ›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 104-110 .

Previous Articles Next Articles

Concept extension and case study of market distance toward R&D personnel performance appraisal

Li Hongling, Liao Jianqiao

(College of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074)

Received:2008-09-11 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2009-05-22 Published:2009-05-22

Abstract

Abstract: Abstract: Market distance, which is a concept in the background of industrial and agricultural economy, also can be extended into R&D area. The concept of market distance is extended from the view of knowledge economy and it is pointed out that the R&D personnel market distance is an important factor infulencing on his performance appraisal. A model reflecting the matching relationship between the R&D personnel market distance and the appraisal is constructed; By analyzing a case, the model is tested.

Key words: performance appraisal, R&D personnel, market distance, concept extension, comprehensive model

CLC Number:

F273

Li Hongling, Liao Jianqiao
. Concept extension and case study of market distance toward R&D personnel performance appraisal[J]. Science Research Management, 2009, 30(3): 104-110 .

[1]	Zhou Wenli, Gu Yuandong, Tang Tianzhen. Influence of R&D personnel′s positive emotion on their creative behavior: The mediating effect of self-creativity efficacy and job involvement [J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(8): 268-276.
[2]	Wang Shuhong, Wang Yutong, Ma Jiayi. A research on the effects of guanxi practices on employees’ motivation to improve performance [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(5): 147-155.
[3]	Zhou Xiaolan，Li Zhen，Zhang Tiqin. Orientation on knowledge sharing intention under performance appraisal intervention [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(3): 90-100.
[4]	Gu Yuandong, Zhong Weiguo, Zhou Wenli. A study of the relationship between R&D personnel’s successful or failed experiences and innovative behaviors [J]. Science Research Management, 2017, 38(7): 100-107.
[5]	Huang Ping. Single factor efficiency analysis in different types of technological innovation activities [J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(11): 64-70.
[6]	Feng Haiyan. Research on performanceappraisal management of innovation ability of university scientific research team [J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(1): 54-62.
[7]	Sun Rui. An empirical study on strategic human resource management, organizational climate for innovation and R&D personnel innovation [J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(8): 34-43.
[8]	Lin Zhaowen, Zhang Tongjian. Research on correlation between core values identifying and knowledge transferring—Based on the data validation of R&D staff in state-owned enterprises [J]. Science Research Management, 2014, 35(3): 123-130.
[9]	Chang Tao1, Liao Jianqiao2 . The influencing model of team-based performance appraisal on knowledge sharing [J]. Science Research Management, 2011, 32(1): 111-121 .
[10]	Ma Jun1, Wang Yu2 . Studies on the intrinsic driving mechanism of performance appraisal system and its effects on job performance [J]. Science Research Management, 2010, 31(6): 180-190 .
[11]	Zhang Qi1, Zhu Chukui2, Zhu Xiang2 . A study on the impact of perception for justice in performance appraisal on the job satisfaction [J]. Science Research Management, 2009, 30(3): 111-116 .
[12]	Zhang Qi1, Chen Jin2, Li Xiaohong3 . A study on the relationship between perception of justice in performance appraisal and organizational commitment [J]. Science Research Management, 2009, 30(2): 111-118 .

Concept extension and case study of market distance toward R&D personnel performance appraisal

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 12

Recommended Articles

Metrics