The emprical research on the impact factors for the compatible between

enterprise’s technology strategy and corporate strategy

Science Research Management ›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 1-8 .

The emprical research on the impact factors for the compatible between enterprise’s technology strategy and corporate strategy

Chen Jin1, He Yubing2, Yao Wei2

1.College of Public Administration,Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China;
2.College of Management,Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Received:2007-06-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-01-01 Published:2008-01-01

Abstract

Abstract: Abstract: The the internal relationship between corporate environment, top management team, technological resources, internal cohesive force between technology strategy and corporate strategy is explored. The result suggests that these four factors indeed have different level of positive impact on the compatible between technology strategy and corporate strategy. In order to improve their innovation and business performance, enterprises should achieve the compatible between these strategies through managerial innovation.

Key words: technology strategy, corporate strategy, compatible, impact factor

CLC Number:

F273.1

Chen Jin1, He Yubing2, Yao Wei2
. The emprical research on the impact factors for the compatible between enterprise’s technology strategy and corporate strategy[J]. Science Research Management, 2008, 29(5): 1-8 .

[1]	Zheng Ying, Huang Junwei. The impact of patent acquisition strategy on firm performance: A study from the integrating perspective of application and maintenance decisions [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(10): 180-191.
[2]	Su Jingqin, Lin Jingjing, Zhang Yanming. Differences and influence mechanism of enterprise product platform independence——A comparative case study [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(10): 220-229.
[3]	Fang Ling1, Zhong Weijun2, Mei Shu’e2. A research on the information system security technology strategy based on risk preference [J]. Science Research Management, 2017, 38(12): 165-172.
[4]	. The evolution trajectory and early identification of disruptive technology by taking smartphones and other technologies as an example [J]. Science Research Management, 2016, 37(3): 13-20.
[5]	Li Yuhua, Gao Yang, Hu Yaoying. The impact factor of the complex product system technology diffusionbased on the structural equation model [J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(5): 146-152.
[6]	Yu Liping, Pan Yuntao, Wu Yishan . Study on source indexes and influence of the academic journal evaluation [J]. Science Research Management, 2010, 31(6): 173-179 .
[7]	Lai Yuangen1, Zhu Donghua2 . Systemic study on the theory of technology threat between different organizations [J]. Science Research Management, 2009, 30(4): 123-129 .
[8]	Yi Famin . Analysis on the E-commerce application condition in agricultural business [J]. Science Research Management, 2009, 30(3): 180-186 .
[9]	Yue Shujiing. R&D efficiency differences and affecting factors : A cross-province analysis using the stochastic frontier approach [J]. Science Research Management, 2008, 29(5): 173-179 .
[10]	Ruan Peng1, Peng Yun2, Huang Yan1. Empirical study on the talented person impact factor appraisal method- Based on the medicine science and technology [J]. Science Research Management, 2008, 29(5): 138-148 .
[11]	Wei Lin, Zhao Dingtao, Liang Liang. The discussion on psychological contract between the governmentand the public servant of China [J]. Science Research Management, 2007, 28(5): 136-142.
[12]	Hou Ting, Zhu Dong-hua. SWOT analysis based innovation project technology assessment and decision research [J]. Science Research Management, 2006, 27(4): 1-6.

The emprical research on the impact factors for the compatible between enterprise’s technology strategy and corporate strategy

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 12

Recommended Articles

Metrics