A review on the status quo study of international scientific collaboration

Science Research Management ›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 179-186 .

Previous Articles Next Articles

A review on the status quo study of international scientific collaboration

Xie Caixia1,2

1. Institute of STS, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China;
2. WISE Lab, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

Received:2006-06-13 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-05-20 Published:2008-05-20

Abstract

Abstract: With the rapid development of science, the collaborative relationship in science research has become a huge power that affects science productivity and attracts the close attention from many scientists, S&T policy constitutors, and governors. More and more studies on the scientific collaboration have been done thoroughly. The research progress of the international science collaboration is summarized so that some patterns of scientific collaboration promoting the performance of science research can be discovered.

Key words: scientific collaboration, research state, review

CLC Number:

G301

Xie Caixia1,2. A review on the status quo study of international scientific collaboration[J]. Science Research Management, 2008, 29(3): 179-186 .

[1]	Zhan Jun, Zhang Shun. Service innovation theory developed in the past 40 years: Research context and development in foreign countries [J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(5): 9-22.
[2]	Yue Zhenming, Zhao Shukuan. The research status and trend of innovation network in China [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(5): 141-153.
[3]	Zhou Wei, Lin Nan, Zhang Qian. Academic entrepreneurship: A literature review and prospects [J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(1): 14-21.
[4]	Meng Fanrong, Chen Zitao, Yuan Meng, Wang Huan. Domestic studies on S&T societies need to be reintegrated urgently [J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(12): 72-79.
[5]	Li Yingzi, Zhang Shuo, Zhang Xiaodong. A review of key impacting factors in the evolution process of open source design [J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(8): 13-22.
[6]	Fang Wei, Sun Zehua, Tang Lulu. A review and prospect of the research on military-civilian integrated innovation [J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(3): 61-71.
[7]	Huang Jiawen. Is social network of enterprise always useful:A literature review [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(9): 57-64.
[8]	Chen Xin. A comparative study of the S&T collaboration networks in countries along the Belt and Road [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(7): 22-32.
[9]	Chi Jingru, Tao Rui, Li Ting. A review on the international research frontier and development status of science and technology evaluation industry [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(6): 276-284.
[10]	Zhou Peng. A foreign literature review on the mechanism of intelligence operating in technological innovation [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(4): 14-23.
[11]	Li Qiaoxing, Xu Sihui. Review of the modern industrial system based on the knowledge map [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(2): 175-185.
[12]	Li Fei, Li Dajun, Liu Qian. Non-peer review of academic researches and countermeasures [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(11): 285-288.
[13]	Liu Liang, Luo Tian, Cao Jiming. A study of the multi-scale scientific collaboration patterns based on complex networks [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(1): 191-198.
[14]	. A Review of Microblogging Research: Information, Service and Network [J]. Science Research Management, 2017, 38(4): 123-131.
[15]	Pan Xiaobo, Huang Weilai, Cai Shuqin. Converting Negative Appended Reviews and Online Customers’ Attitudinal Ambivalence [J]. Science Research Management, 2017, 38(4): 104-112.

A review on the status quo study of international scientific collaboration

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics